Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 4 amendment of section 5 Sorted by: old Court: madhya pradesh Page 8 of about 3,863 results (0.188 seconds)

Sep 12 2013 (HC)

Madhya Pradesh Vidyut Mandal Abhiyanta Sangh Vs. the State of Madhya P ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... utility and taking measures conducive to the development and management of the electricity industries in the state in an efficient, economic and competitive manner. apart from the provisions made under the 2000 act for establishment of different companies for the purposes of 10 looking after the work and business of the electricity industry as provided in ..... after dissolution of the board in a meeting with the secretary of the energy department of government of madhya pradesh and it was specifically resolved that those amendments were not to be recalled. it was decided in such meeting that posts were to be created for each and every company separately and total number of ..... of the change of the policy, the respondents-companies have adopted the promotion rules as a whole afresh, without even taking note of the necessity of the amendment or modification in the said rules and has started the process of appointment by promotion and since these promotion rules, as adopted, would come in the way .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 1958 (HC)

K.S. Nazar Ali Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1958MP282; [1959]10STC117(MP)

..... prepayment of tax assessed, has refused to exercise jurisdiction conferred upon him under section 12 of the sales tax act of samvat 2007? 2. whether section 12 of the sales tax act before the amendment act of sales tax act conferred on the petitioner a right to file a revision application without depositing an assessed amount of tax and if ..... preferred'. this section, as originally enacted, did not contain the third proviso to sub-section (2). it 'was inserted by the madhya bharat sales tax (fifth amendment) act 1955 which came into force on 15-4-1955. the petitioning mills, who were assessed to sales tax, did not appeal against the assessment. they, however, filed ..... that the discretionary revisional jurisdiction of the commissioner under section 12 (2) which is subject to certain limitations introduces an alternative category of remedy akin to and competitive with the remedy o an appeal under section 11.the words 'may on application for revision of an order by a dealer', when read in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 1958 (HC)

Municipal Committee Vs. Ramkaran Ganeshilal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1958MP355

..... the administrator under section 80, it may so happen that by the time the suit is filed, the committee may be reconstituted and then it will necessitate amendment of the plaint. a lay litigant against the municipality will, therefore, always be exposed to the risk of his losing his case on the mere technicalities of ..... , and not to the municipality. sanction to construct certain building had been granted to him by the municipality, but it was superseded under section 238. punjab municipal act, and the sanction was suspended by the deputy commissioner, sialkot. the plaintiff, then, served a notice on the secretary of state for india in council, through ..... corporate that it loses the fundamental characteristics of a corporation and is transformed into a department of the state. section 37 of the central provinces and berar municipalities act, 1922, specifically says that every committee shall have a perpetual succession and a common seal and in such name shall sue and be sued. this provision .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1958 (HC)

inayatullah Khan Vs. Diwanchand Mahajan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959MP58

..... common law. according to their lordships, the resolution of all election disputes must be limited to the extent they are provided for in the representation of the people act. basing his arguments upon this, shri dabir, who appeared for inayatullah, contended that the cross-objection was untenable. reference was made to section 82 of the ..... whole or in part, he shall- (a) count the ballot papers again in accordance with the decision- (b) amend the result sheet in form 22 to the extent necessary after such recount; and (c) announce the amendments so made by him. (6) after the total number of votes polled by each candidate has been announced under sub ..... a direct authority for that proposition is available in jaikrishna v. sawatram, air 3940 nag 292, where pollock j. reached this conclusion in relation to the provincial insolvency act. and referred to a full bench decision of the madras high court reported in alagappa chettiar v. chockalingam chetty, ilr 41 mad 904 : (air 1919 mad 784 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1958 (HC)

K.L. Chaturvedi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1960CriLJ1614

..... the only question that arises for consideration is whether the drugs act of 1940, as amended by the amending act (no. xi of 1955), is ultra vires and unconstitutional by reason of the, fact that the provisions now contained in it violate article 19(1)( ..... on the cartons and labels of his medicinal preparation 'germs killer'.3. mandating the respondents not to give effect to the provisions of the drugs act (no. xxiii of 1940), as amended by the drugs (amendment) act, (no. xi of 1955) in the manner and to the extent objected to by the petitioner in paragraph 8 of the petition.11. ..... of the true formula or the list of ingredients on the label or container of his patent or proprietary medicine 'germs killer' was obligatory on him.8. after the amending act (no. xi of 1955) had come into force, the director of health services by his memorandum, dated 21st february 1957, informed the petitioner in answer to his letter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 1958 (HC)

Kashi Prasad Sinha Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959MP183

..... costs.3. after the arguments had proceeded for sometime, which, to a certain extent, clarified the respective contentions of the parties, the petitioner prayed for leave to amend the petition. we considered it advisable to adjourn the case for a few days for the purpose, and we have now before us an application for ..... certain issues which arose for determination in the original petition.the petitioned has no doubt in the application for amendment made certain additional averments supported by additional documentary evidence to show that the director of public instruction has been acting as if he had all the powers of the board. on that basis it is contended that the stand ..... amendment filed by the petitioner an well as its reply by the respondents.the amendment raises no new points, except such as were being canvassed before us when we adjourned the case, and as there is no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1958 (HC)

Mohammad HussaIn Vs. Firm Andani Co.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959MP30

..... government the agreement would stand cancelled and that as javarchand failed to secure that order the contract got cancelled after 1-4-1949.12. this petition for amendment was opposed on behalf of the defendant on the ground that this would entail remand for investigating disputed questions of fact newly raised and when the claim as ..... defendant for the performance of the contract. even claim for interest on the amount of consideration would fall within that term.15. article 97 of the limitation act on theother hand deals with a suit for recovery of moneypaid on an existing consideration which afterwardsfails. period of limitation is three years from thedate of failure. ..... action if this were true.besides this there was the admitted conduct of the plaintiff in filing criminal prosecution against the defendant on 22-3-1949 for the act of the latter in securing rs. 5000/- from him by resorting to cheating and also the oral evidence of two witnesses dharamchand and fakruddin regarding the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 1958 (HC)

Jamuna Prasad Singh Vs. Shri Ramnivas and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959MP226

..... respondent no. 6, and in view of the provisions of sections 100 and 123 of the representation of the people act this matter could not be gone into in an enquiry against the present returned candidate. by his application for amendment the petitioner sought to change respondent no. 6 to respondent no. 1. it may be pointed out that a ..... view of the long delay and the fact that the written statements on the original allegation were already in, we do not think that the tribunal erred in disallowing the amendment. 5. once this question is decided in this manner and the petition is not corrected, it is manifest enough that the decision of the tribunal in rejecting the ..... was disallowed. we think that the decision of the tribunal on this part of the case is impeccable. 7. iii. the next ground is the disallowance of the application for amendment of paragraph 12(b) (ix) of the petition, where respondent no. 6 was sought to be changed to respondent no. 1. the tribunal rejected this application by its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 1958 (HC)

Dr. Daryaosingh Rao Vs. Dr. Pramilabai Bhandarkar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959MP191

..... the decisions of the courts below, and remit the case to the original) court for trial and disposal according to law after framing proper issues on the amended plaint and the reply which the defendant may file to it. parties shall bear their own costs here and in the lower appellate court. they shall appear before ..... scaffolding constituted an interference sufficiently physical and direct to be a breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment. 5. all these authorities establish the proposition that no act of a lessor can be regarded as anactionable breach of a covenant for quiet enjoymentunless it involves some physical or direct interference with the enjoyment of the ..... second appeal. 2. mr. chitale, learned counsel for the appellant, contended that there was an implied covenant under section 108(e) of the transfer of property act for quiet enjoyment of the rooms when the plaintiff took them on rent; that anything that interfered with reasonable use of the property was a breach of the covenant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1958 (HC)

Pemsingh Raghunathsingh Vs. Gajrabai W/O Dhulji and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959MP327

..... following form:[kkrk ljnkjckbz enz j?kwukfkflag] xtjkckbz] enz?kwyth dks laer 2006 tqus iku laer 2005&6tek ukes 185ferh iks'k cnh 14 jksdmk:i;k 185 tek laer 2007 glrs izseflag ds- 2187&7&0ckdh c- lq- 1 :- nsuk eatwj481&7&0216ferh psr lq- 15 xsgwa tek 481&7&0[kkrk dk :i;k- ek.kh 3 izr 72 ..... liability and did not contain any express promise to pay the debt and that, therefore, it was an acknowledgment for the purposes of article 1 schedule i of the stamp act and was sufficiently stamped. relying on ramchandra v. muka gujan, air 1934 nag 273, learned counsel contended that for a document to be covered by the proviso to article 1 ..... express promise to pay that it was held by the bombay high court that it satisfied all the requirements of an acknowledgment under article 1 schedule 1 of the stamp act. in my opinion, the learned trial judge was right in holding that the document in question was not an acknowledgment but a bond and in directing the plaintiff to pay .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //