Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 4 amendment of section 5 Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 29,754 results (0.299 seconds)

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to abide by such other orders as the commission may pass and comply with the directions, including payment of costs, if any; (f) omitted by competition (amendment) act, 2007 (g) pass such other order or issue such directions as it may deem fit. provided that while passing orders under this section, if the commission comes ..... continuance of such agreement or ten percent. of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher. (c) omitted by competition (amendment) act, 2007 (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be specified in the order by the commission; ..... ; (c) the creation, allotment, surrender or cancellation of any shares, stocks or securities; 48(d) [omitted by competition (amendment) act, 2007]. (e) the formation or winding up of an enterprise or the amendment of the memorandum of association or articles of association or any other instruments regulating the business of any enterprise; (f) the .....

Competition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... bodies are created for performing two kinds of functions, one, advisory and regulatory and other adjudicatory. though the tribunal has been constituted by the competition (amendment) act, 2007, the commission continues to perform both the functions stated by 68 this court in that case. cumulative effect of the above reasoning is that the ..... india. this committee made recommendations and submitted its report on 22nd of may, 2002. after completion of the consultation process, the competition act, 2002 (for short, the `act') as act 12 of 2003, dated 12th december, 2003, was enacted. as per the statement of objects and reasons, this enactment is india ..... is the measure stating the final attitude of the commission concerning undertakings against which proceedings for infringement of the rules on competition have been commenced.; the jurisdiction of the commission, to act under this provision, does not contemplate any adjudicatory function. the commission is not expected to give notice to the .....

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... act 2008 xiv. the competition act 2002 xv. the companies act 2013 xvi. the cinematograph act 1952 xvii. the income tax act 1961 xviii. the customs act 1962 xix. the administrative tribunals act 1985 xx. the consumer protection act 1986 xxi. the securities and exchange board of india act 1992 xxii. the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act 1993 xxiii. the armed forces tribunal act 2007 ..... during the pre- independence era, the number of tribunals has now increased to several dozens. the constitution of india (42nd amendment) act, 1976 provided for setting up of administrative tribunals through article 323a as well as other tribunals under article 323b. these aforementioned ..... law, tax law, company law or environment law, etc. legislative development of tribunalisation :38. in india, the constitution (42nd amendment) act, 1976 paved way for tribunalisation of the justice dispensation system by introduction of articles 323a and 323b in the constitution. these provisions .....

Director General of Foreign Trade and Anr Vs. M/S Kanak Exports and An ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... on march 31, 2003, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 5 of the act, read with para 1.1 of the exim policy 2002-2007, the central government amended and notified the exim policy 2002- 2007 (revised edition: march 2003). the revised edition came into force with effect from april 01 ..... for augmenting production and providing services. (iii) to enhance the technological strength and efficiency of indian agriculture, industry and services, thereby improving their competitive strength while generating new employment opportunities, and to encourage the attainment of internationally accepted standards of quality. (iv) to provide consumers with good quality ..... goods and services at internationally competitive prices while at the same time creating a level playing field for the domestic producers. keeping in mind the aforesaid principal objectives, para .....

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai Vs. Ms. Fiat India (P) Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the sale where goods are sold to unrelated parties and price is the sole consideration.16. shri. v. lakshmi kumaran would further submit that section 4 of the act was amended on 1st april 2000 to incorporate transaction value as an assessable value instead of normal price and the expression ordinarily was dropped. therefore, the new ..... assembled and sold. this cost of imports, assembly and overheads lead to increase in overall cost of production of their cars. further, they were facing intense competition from maruti car manufacturers which required them to keep the price of their cars at a lower price. therefore, they were forced to sell their cars at ..... submit 25% bond amount as a bank guarantee and requested the revenue authorities to reduce the same. on such request, the commissioner, vide letter dated 23.04.2007, directed the respondents to execute bank guarantee equivalent to 5% of the bond amount. accordingly, the respondent furnished a bank guarantee of rs. 38 lakhs which .....

Century Metal Recycling Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... transactional value under the repealed customs valuation (determination of price of imported goods) rules,1988 ( the 1988 rules , for short) and the pre-amended section 14(1) of the act which were considered and interpreted by this court in eicher tractors limited, haryana v. commissioner of customs, mumbai2. in fact, the judgment in ..... (a) to (f) i.e. higher value of identical similar goods of comparable quantities in a comparable transaction, abnormal discount or abnormal deduction from ordinary competitive prices, sales involving the special prices, misdeclaration on parameters such as description, quality, quantity, country of origin, year of manufacture or production, non-declaration of ..... he proceeds to discard the declared value and decides to determine the same by proceeding sequentially in accordance with rules 4 to 9 of the 2007 rules. it refers to a doubt which the proper officer possesses even after the importer has been asked to furnish further information including documents and .....

Vidarbha Industries Power Limited Vs. Axis Bank Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... second provisos and has not been admitted by the adjudicating authority before the 5 commencement of the insolvency and bankruptcy code (amendment) act, 2020, such application shall be modified to comply with the requirements of the first or second proviso within thirty days of the commencement of ..... of midc. midc granted its noc to the power project agreement.6. on 21st june 2013, the cabinet committee on economic affairs (ccea) amended the new coal distribution policy 2007, pursuant to 2 which the ministry of coal (moc) issued an order on 17th july 2013 directing coal india limited (cil) to sign ..... and controlled by the state electricity regulatory commission constituted under the said act. under sections 61 to 63 of the electricity act, the state electricity regulatory commission determines the tariff chargeable by electricity generating companies.4. through an international competitive bidding process conducted by the maharashtra industrial development corporation (midc), the .....

The State of Bombay Vs. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1957SC699; (1957)59BOMLR945; (1957)35MysLJ(SC)283; [1957]1SCR874

..... 20, 1952, the state of bombay passed the bombay lotteries and prize competitions control and tax (amendment) act (bom. xxx of 1952). this act amended the provisions of the 1948 act in several particulars. thus, the words 'but does not include a prize competition contained in a newspaper printed and published outside the province of bombay', which ..... and gambling under entry 34 as hereinbefore mentioned. by the amending act xxx of 1952 the legislature by deleting the concluding words of the definition of 'prize competition', namely, 'but does not include etc., etc.,' extended the operation of the act to prize competitions carried on in newspapers printed and published outside the state ..... deletion was that the scope and the application of the 1948 act so amended became enlarged and extended so as to cover prize competitions contained in newspapers printed and published outside the state of bombay. after clause (d) of s. 2(1) the amending act inserted a new clause (dd) which defined the word ' .....

T.S. Krishna Vs. C.i.T., Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1976SC2674; [1973]87ITR429(SC); (1973)1SCC69; [1973]2SCR533

..... business or profession' in the last part of the explanation to the said sub-clause because according to him the prohibition to deduction under section 2 of the amending act is the amount paid on account of wealth-tax which expression has been given an extended meaning to cover the wealth-tax payable under the wealth-tax ..... . where it is levied and paid under the law of any country outside india. the following are the relevant provisions of the amendment act :(2) in section 40 of the income-tax act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the principal act), after sub-clause (ii) of clause (a), the following sub-clause shall be, and shall be deemed always to have ..... to clause (a) of section 40 and sub-section (1a) to section 58. this was followed by the income-tax (amendment) act 41 of 1972, the preamble of which enacted that it was 'further to amend 'the income-tax act, 1961 and to provide for barring in the computation of total income in respect of certain assessment years prior to the assessment .....

Samir Agrawal Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and 53t of the act, where the expression used is person aggrieved , but hastened to add that once an informant had moved the cci, for the purposes of filing ..... referred us to various provisions of the act, including, in particular, sections 19 and 35, arguing that the amendments made in the sections would show that any person can be an informant who can approach the cci, as one does not have to be a consumer or a complainant , which was the position before the competition (amendment) act, 2007 [ 2007 amendment ].. he contrasted these provisions with sections 53b .....