Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 4 amendment of section 5 Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 5,684 results (0.174 seconds)

Rameshwar Soni Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(Raj)398; [2009]316ITR361(Raj)

..... framed is, as to whether block assessment made by the assessing authority, as modified by the tribunal, can be sustained in view of the amended clause (c) of section 158bb of the act, as inserted by the finance act, 2002, w.e.f. 1st july, 1995.3. so far as the question nos. 1 and 4 are concerned, as an abstract legal ..... made by the ao. a search was undertaken on 5th jan., 1996, and consequent thereupon proceedings were initiated, and vide annex. 1, assessment was made under section 158bc of the act, assessing a total undisclosed income of rs. 12,19,481, and assessing tax thereon.2. the appeal was admitted vide order dt. 9th dec, 2002, by framing four substantial questions ..... by this court, in it appeal no. 91 of 2002 cit v. late manohar lal soni decided on 23rd nov., 2007 : reported at (2008) 1 dtr (raj) 346--ed., wherein the provisions of section 158bb(l)(c), as inserted by amendment had been considered, and the above view has been taken.5. the question then is, as to whether, in any .....

Poonam Chand Bhandari Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj885

..... rule 15-b, the existence of definite guidelines and policy for allotment of land for the purposes of infrastructure projects is necessary - the reserve price and competitive bidding obviates arbitrariness that the business rules framed under article 166 of the constitution of india are for the convenient transaction of the business of the state ..... .i. and the rules of business37. the principal secretary, urban development and housing department in his affidavit filed on 25.4.2007 has stated that the rajasthan rules of business came to be amended by the government of rajasthan vide notification no. p.27 (6) cab/99 dated 10.1.1999 and the existing rule ..... case cannot be countenanced and may render such decision or allotment unsustainable in law. reserve price and competitive bidding necessarily obviates arbitrariness and provides transparency.section 90(2)36. section 90(2) of the j.d.a. act is to the effect that the state government can direct the authority to exercise its powers and perform .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ramesh Chand Soni

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(Raj)84

..... ending with the last date on which the assessee is required to furnish a report of such audit under that sub-section, or(iv) omitted by the direct tax laws (amendment) act, 1987, w.e.f, 1st april, 1989.(iva) the period (not exceeding sixty days) commencing from the date on which the ao received the declaration under sub- ..... such saving/validating provisions the assessment made on 8th march, 2001 was clearly barred by time when made as per extant provisions and were not validated by subsequent amendment of the act through substitution of expln, 1 to section 158be w.e.f. 1st june, 2002.25. since excluding the entire period of 180 days, the assessment order ..... of four years or seven years limitation was prescribed depending upon the quantum of estimated escaped liability towards tax.the revenue had relied on the amendment made in section 150(1) of the act as amended w.e.f. april, 1989. it was contended by the revenue that the limitation prescribed under section 149 will not be attracted by .....

Bheru Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1997(1)WLN83

..... notification under section 4(1) i.e. last of the dates referred to in section 4(1). under first proviso to section 6(1) as amended in the land acquisition act (amendment); act 68 of 1984, no declaration in respect of any particular land covered by notification under section 4(1) shall be published after the expiry of one ..... in sangappa gurulingappa sajjan v. state of karnataka 1994 l.a.c.c. 604 (sc) pending validity of the notification under section 4(1) of the land acquisition act, the high court granted stay of dispossession and the supreme court held as underadmittedly, pending writ petition on both the occasions the high court granted 'stay of dispossession'. ..... they have no locus stand to challenge the acquisition. the argument is refuted by the counsel for the petitioners on the submissions that under section 16 of the act when the collector has made an award under section 11 and in pursuance thereof, takes possession of the land, thereupon the land acquired shall vest absolutely in the .....

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Maharaja Shri Devi Singhji of Jodhpur

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1985]155ITR333(Raj); 1983()WLN732

..... 274 continued and he could dispose of the penalty proceedings. it was also observed that the iac would continue to have jurisdiction in matters pending before him despite the amendment act of 1970, as there is no intention either by express words or by necessary implication that the iac will not have jurisdiction even in pending matters. in other ..... answer to question no. 2, if the answer is that obtaining the previous approval of the iac to proceed under section 18(1)(a) was necessary even after the amending act no. 46 of 1964 came into force, for levying penalty after april 1, 1965, then there would be no necessity for any reference to a third member. but ..... first case, their lordships were pleased to observe that as regards the jurisdiction of the iac to pass the order of penalty, in view of the amendment to section 274 by the amendment act, it is well-settled law that every litigant has a vested right in the procedural law, so far as substance is concerned. if the substantive question .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2002]255ITR599(Raj)

..... for bad and doubtful debts account made under that clause.' 7. section 36(l)(vii) was introduced by the income-tax (amendment) act, 1986, with a view to provide for grant of deduction in respect of provision for bad debt made by all the banks up ..... for the assessment year 1987-88.2. this court admitted the appeal on the following question of law :'whether after the finance act, 1985, amending the provisions of section 36(l)(vii) and section 36(2) with effect from april 1,1985, inserting a proviso to section ..... rural branches. the commissioner of income-tax (appeals) again remitted the matter to the assessing officer in view of the amendments made in sections 36(l)(vii) and 36(l)(vii) with effect from april 1, 1985/april 1, 1987, for de novo ..... completion of assessment after examining the amended provisions. the assessing officer disallowed the claim of the assessee regarding deduction of rs. 7,88,848 as bad debt for .....

Cit Vs. the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2002)174CTR(Raj)400

..... provision for bad and doubtful debts account made under that clause.'7. section 36(1)(viia) was introduced by the income tax (amendment) act, 1986, with a view to provide for grant of deduction in respect of provision for bad debt made by all the banks upto ..... debt for the assessment year 1987-88.2. this court admitted the appeal on the following question of law :'whether after the finance act, 1985, amending the provisions of section 36(1)(viii) and section 36(2) with effect from 1-4-1985, inserting proviso to section 36(i ..... and not the rural branches. the commissioner (appeals) again remitted the matter to the assessing officer in view of the amendments made in section 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) with effect from 1-4-1985/1-4-1987, for de novo completion ..... of assessment after examining the amended provisions. the assessing officer disallowed the claim of the assessee regarding deduction of rs. 7,88,848 as bad debt for .....

Dharamveer Tholia and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2000(3)WLC399; 2007(3)WLN569

..... very purpose of protection has been frustrated. upon such pleas, the petitioners prayed to quash and set aside rule 13 of the rules of 1962 as amended by amendment act no.44 dated 3.2.1993 and to declare a fresh result of 15 times of number of vacancies plus 5% in addition to the preliminary examination ..... he issued ad interim writ directing the rpsc to publish the result of the preliminary examination of raj as than state and subordinate service direct recruitment by combined competitive examination, category-wise for the scheduled caste, scheduled tribe and other backward classes candidates and rest of the candidates in general category separately. it was also ..... this judgment, i would like to give separate though concurring judgment.57. the position as it was invogue prior to the amendment of the raj as than state & subordinate services (direct recruitment by combined competitive examinations) rules, 1999 (for short 'the rules of 1999'); as per the scheme of rule 13 of rajasthan state and .....

Gannon Dunkerley and Co. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1994(1)WLC554; 1994(1)WLN652

..... -section (3) was added in section 5 and sub-section (2-c) was inserted in section 7. then again, by rajasthan sales tax (second amendment) act, 1988 (act no. 13 of 1988) definition of 'works contract' contained in clause (u). was substituted. after the decision of the supreme court in builders association ..... the cost of labour up to such extent as may be prescribed.15. the expiration 'works contract' was defined in section 2(u), which was inserted by amending act no. 9 of 1988:2(u)--works contract' includes any agreement for the buildings, construction, manufacture, processing, fabrication, erection, installation, fitting out, overhauling, repair ..... the hon'ble supreme court has traced the historical background of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions and the circumstances leading to the constitution (forty sixth amendment) act, 1982. i shall therefore, make a brief reference to the relevant provisions.5. there was a conflict of judicial opinion amongst the various high courts .....

Narendra Kirodiwal Vs. Raj. Pub. Service Commi., Ajmer and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... declared successful. thereafter, he appeared in the physical efficiency test also. after written examination and physical efficiency test, the respondent commission declared result of the competitive examination for recruitment on the posts of sub inspector of police, in which, the petitioner was declared qualified for appearing in the interview. after declaring ..... is no dispute with regard to issuance of notification dated 23.09.2008 whereby age relaxation has been granted to the posts of 72 other service rules in which following amendment was made : , ! " , & !! ( ( , ( ( ( (( 3 (( (& (/" ! &/& 1 (c) the petitioners were allowed to appear in the written examination and physical efficiency test ..... rules 1989 has not been included in the said notification although for the post of sub inspector of police last selections were made in the year 2007 and, thereafter, no vacancy was advertised for three years. therefore, obviously the benefit of age relaxation is 5 also required to be made .....