Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 4 amendment of section 5 Court: madhya pradesh Page 100 of about 3,853 results (0.159 seconds)

Sitaram Vs. Mathuralal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1984MP58; 1985MPLJ329

..... note does not bear the refugee relief stamp of 10 p. which was levied according to section 3a of the stamp act.2. section 3-a of the stamp act, which is reproduced below, was introduced by the stamp and excise duty (amendment) act, 1971 (44 of 71):'3-a. (1) every instrument chargeable with duty under order 3 read with articles 13 ..... with additional duty as referred to in schedule i-a of the stamp act which does not include article 49 of the stamp act dealing with promissory note as included in schedule 1 of the stamp act. schedule 1-a finds place in the central provinces and berar indian stamp (amendment) act, 1939 which is applicable to the state of m. p. as ..... stated earlier schedule 1-a of the said act nowhere mentions promissory note, on which any additional stamp duty of 10 p. is .....

Sardar Pritam Singh Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [1985]154ITR133(MP)

..... by the iac on april 30, 1975. the contention of the assesses on the point of limitation was that section 275, as it stood before its amendment by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1970, applied and the order imposing penalty ought to have been passed within two years from the date of completion of the assessment proceedings, i'.e., ..... within two years from. march 29, 1972. now, the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1970, came into force on april 1, 1971, even before the date of the assessment order. it is well settled that a provision as to the limitation is ..... . in the circumstances, there is no question whatsoever of application section 275 as it stood before the amendment. the tribunal, in our opinion, was clearly right in holding that section 275 as amended by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1970, applied. it is not in dispute that the order of the iac dated april, 30, 1975, was passed within .....

Swarnjee Singh Vs. Asharam Gamne

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(1)MPHT396

..... the defendant in civil revision no. 1446/94. during the pendency of the revision the learned counsel for the original plaintiff submitted that he would withdraw the application for amendment. because of this statement the civil revision was dismissed.3. while the matter stood thus, the original plaintiffs asharam gamne expired. his legal representatives, namely, non- applicant ..... the suit for eviction under clauses (e) and (o) of section 12 (1) of the act and during the pendency of suit a new ground of 'bona fide need' came into existence, the transferee-landlord could be allowed to amend plaint and claim relief or eviction on such ground.'(quoted from the placitum)at this juncture, i may ..... , but amounts to no more than adding to the facts already on the record, the amendment would be allowed even after the statutory period of limitation. the question in the present case is whether by seeking benefit of section 39 of new act there is a change in the cause of action. in a.k. gupta and sons .....

Raj Kumar Dawar and Another Vs. State of M.P. and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2001MP157; 2001(1)MPHT464

..... the petitioners submitted that the fee cannot be enhanced unless the bye-laws framed under section 357 of madhya pradesh municipalities act (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') are amended. learned counsel submitted that section 358 of the act provides for framing of bye-laws. the bye-laws have been framed and have been published in madhya pradesh gazette dated ..... the matters relating to tax and bye-laws are included in sub-section (2) of section 358 of the act. the present bye-laws are framed under section 358 (7) (m), therefore, unless the bye-laws are amended the fee cannot be enhanced.8. to appreciate the controversy it has to be examined whether municipal council is empowered ..... v. union of india, reported in air 1957 sc 676, considering the scope of section 21 of general clauses act the apex court has held in para 15 that power to issue an order includes power to amend the order but this power is subject to a very important qualification and the qualification is contained in the words .....

Ram Kishan and Another Vs. State of M.P. and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2001MP176; 2001(2)MPHT14

..... therefore, be liable to pay entertainment duty only as prescribed under section 3 of the m.p. entertainments duty and advertisements act, 1936 (no. 30 of 1936) as amended by the m.p. entertainments duty and advertisements (amendment) act, 1983.'after referring to the aforesaid decision their lordships observed that use of such a system should he subjected to the ..... a picture tube having screen of any dimension. if the licensing authority means to restrict the use of screen beyond certain dimensions, the rules have to be amended or the condition has to be incorporated in the licence itself. it appears that the state government on receiving information that wide screens arc being used in video ..... picture tube having screen of any dimension. if the licencing authority means to restrict the use of a screen beyond certain dimensions, the rules have to be so amended or the condition has to be incorporated in the licence itself. as long as it is not done, the licencee shall be free to use a picture .....

M/S. P. Pal and Company Vs. State of M.P. and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(3)MPHT214

..... age abide by the m.p. state lottery rules, 1969, and instructions/guidelineby the director from time to time. rule 19 of the m.p. state lottery rules,1969, as amended in 1973 reads as under:'19. in respect of the tickets winning the prizes, govt. may fix a bonus which will be distributed to the agent and the actual seller ..... of must lead to enforcement of the award and not merits thereof. in view of limited scope of enquiry in proceedings for enforcement of foreign award under the foreign awards act. in the facts of the instant case, this decision is of no help to espouse the cause of the appellant.18. learned counsel has also relied on the decision of ..... passed by the arbitrator on 25-8-1990 has been made rule of the court and objections filed by the appellants under sections 33, 15 and 16 of the arbitration act have been rejected by judgment dated 25-7-1994 of the district judge, bhopal. 2. facts shorn of details indicate that m/s. s. pal & co., the appellant, was appointed .....

Sagarbai and ors. Vs. Urmilabai Jaiswal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT486

..... also in accordance with the evidence produced in the case. it is observed in case of veerayee ammal v. seeni ammal, air 2001 sc 2920, that is distressing that despite amendment, the provisions of section 100 of the code have been liberally construed and generously applied by some judges of the high courts with the result that the objective intended to ..... be achieved by the amendment of section 100 appears to have been frustrated.6. the appellant undertakes to vacate the suit premises within the period of 6 months. consequently, the time of 6 months be .....

Baddu. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... air 1997 s.c. 1017, the supreme court while dwelling upon a similar provision i.e. section 15(6) of the madhya pradesh vanopaj (vyapar viniyaman) adhiniyam 1969, amendment act, 1986 (which stipulates "(6)no order of confiscation under sub-section (4) of any tools, vehicles, boats, ropes, chains or any other articles (other than specified ..... connivance of his servant or agent and that all reasonable and necessary precautions had been taken against use of objects aforesaid for commission of an offence under this act. (reproduced from the judgment)") observed that, "8. a bare reading of sub-section (6) of section 15 of the adhiniyam quoted hereinabove shows that ..... conservator of forest, forest circle, seoni. the appellate authority dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner by order dated 31-12- 2007. the petitioner thereafter preferred a revision under section 52b of the act of 1927. 3. the revision was also dismissed by the first additional sessions judge by its order dated 09-06- 2008 .....

Mahendra Singh Vs. the Collector, Gwalior and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1971MP83; 1971MPLJ74

..... authorities under the different provisions of the act. see m.p. local acts by t.c. shrivastava (vol. 7, 1966 edn. page 4984) and m p. local acts by r. k. pandey (vol. 5, 1966edn. at page 4011). now, both these commentaries were published prior to the amendment of 1967. that notification was amended and superseded by notification no. 2229-5354 ..... the janpada panchayat concerned.' in the m. p. local acts by t.c. shrivastava vol. 7 (1966 edition) at page 5019; and also in the local acts by r.k. pandey, vol. v (1966 edition) at p. 4011, this rule is printed as above. this rule was subsequently amended and clause (a) was deleted. the petitioner's contention ..... was that this amendment was invalid. the argument was based on the assumption that the amendment had been made by the government .....

Dinesh Kumar Dubey and Another Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001CriLJ1306; 2001(1)MPHT213

..... para 2 of the preamble of 1981 to the essential commodities (special provisions) act, 1981 was amended and in place of five years period of 10 years was substituted. thereafter by third amendment, the said period of continuance was made for fifteen years. afterexpiry of fifteen years no amendment act was brought into force but certain ordinances were issued. the last of the ordinance was ..... issued in the year 1988, which lost its life and efficacy by lapse of time thereafter no act or ordinances have been issued to continue the provisions of 1981 act. learned counsel for the state was given opportunity .....