Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 24 amendment of section 31 Sorted by: old Court: himachal pradesh Year: 2009 Page 1 of about 94 results (0.381 seconds)

Jan 08 2009 (HC)

Himachal Road Transport Corporation Retired Employees Union Vs. Himach ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-08-2009

Reported in : 2009(1)ShimLC310

..... (conditions of service) amendment act, 1986.' a similar provision which made the amendment by act 35 of 1976 applicable only to those judges who have retired on or after october 1, 1974 was held idtra vires and struck down ..... not be denied the benefit of liberalized pension scheme. their lordships have held as under:at this stage itself, we may note that this amending act 38 of 1986 provided that the amended liberalised pension scheme would apply only to a judge 'who has retired on or after the commencement of the high court and supreme court judges ..... of india : (1983)illj104sc . on the same reasonings and logic we have to hold that amending act 38 of 1986 could not restrict the applicability of the amended provision to only those who have retired on or after the commencement of the amending act. the resultant position would be that the provisions of pension in part i of first schedule as .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 2009 (HC)

Ram Lal Vs. Director, Town and Country Planning Department

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-14-2009

Reported in : AIR2009HP69

..... 10.2001 directing the parties to maintain status quo was confirmed by this court on 14.3.1996. subsequently, by virtue of the provisions of the h.p. courts (amendment) act, 2001 the suit stood transferred to the court of district judge, shimla.6. the court below found that the plaintiff had affixed insufficient court fee and hence vide order dated ..... it is not possible to estimate at a money value the subject matter in dispute, and which is not otherwise provided for by this act, the court fee payable is ninety eight rupees which prior to amendment was nineteen rupees and fifty paise.14. to ascertain as to whether the plaintiff's suit falls within the ambit and scope of ..... section 7 or the second schedule, article 13 of the court fee act the pleadings made in the plaint needs to be examined.15. it cannot .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2009 (HC)

Apurav Chandel Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-02-2009

Reported in : AIR2010HP1

..... that no candidate should suffer for the mistake of the examiner. every student must get the just rewards for the labour put in by him. in these days of great competition where even half a mark can make a great difference, every candidate if not satisfied by the marks awarded to him will apply for re-evaluation. if after reevaluation the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2009 (HC)

Jai Pal and ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-06-2009

..... conviction and sentence, passed by the learned special judge (fast track court), kullu, in sessions trial no. 42 of 2007, decided on 23.4.2008, under section 20 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, in short 'the act', for allegedly having in possession of 1 kg. charas each by jai paul and duni chand, 800 grams by ved ..... hearing the parties and on conclusion of the trial, the appellants were convicted under section 20(b) of the act, on the strength of the judgment passed by this court in dharam pal v. state of h.p. and anr. latest hlj 2007 (hp) 827 for keeping in their possession the charas more the 'small quantity', but less than the 'commercial ..... singh, appellants.2. precisely the case of the prosecution is that on 25.5.2007 at about 2.30 p.m., the police party headed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2009 (HC)

Gurvinder Singh and Vs. State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-06-2009

..... reaching the truth, had it been resorted to by the police.32. the prosecution has relied upon the case diary ex.pw3/b pertaining to fir no. 7 of 2007 of police station, amb, which was taken into possession from the said police station to connect them with offence. it contains the disclosure about the commission of the offence ..... and a nishandehi memo ex.pw3/m was also prepared, he was also identified by dalbir singh and prem kumar aforesaid. during the interrogation, in fir no. 7 of 2007 in police station amb, gurvinder singh appellant is alleged to have disclosed about the theft of indica car in question from shoghi after administering some stupefying agent in the form ..... . further sukhvinder singh is alleged to have disclosed about the present case but his statement recorded under section 27 of the indian evidence act ex.pw3/l and nishandehi ex.pw3/m made on 30.8.2007 is of no avail to the prosecution and also useless as the police already knew the about the facts so disclosed before hand. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2009 (HC)

Harish Kumar Plaha Vs. Shashi Kaura and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-06-2009

Reported in : AIR2009HP49

..... case was fixed for evidence of the defendant on 14.12.2000. on this date, no evidence was present but the defendant filed an application for amendment of the written statement. this amendment was allowed with the consent of the plaintiff on 20.3.2001. thereafter, statements of two more defendant witnesses were recorded on 6.6.2001 ..... a necessary party. in support of his contention shri anand sharma has relied upon on the following judgements i.e. rashtriya mill mazdoor sangh v. empress mills, nagpur and ors. 2007(4) civil court cas 321 (bom) (db), gurcharan singh v. s. amarjit singh and anr. 2005(2) civil court cas 422 (p&h;), and kasturi v. iyyamperumal ..... mohanlal air 1966 rajasthan 89. from the perusal of the aforesaid judgements and a bare reading of section 111(f), it is apparent that the transfer of property act recognizes the concept of implied surrender. this implied surrender can be established by the conduct of the parties. even if there is no intention to surrender, the surrender .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 2009 (HC)

Mohan Lal Sood and ors. Vs. Vinod Dogra and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-07-2009

Reported in : 2009(2)ShimLC42

..... exclusively and he has parted with the possession of the remises or part of it and this has been done after commencement of the act without the written consent of the landlord. a perusal of the amended petition filed by the petitioner of para-18 shows that the second ground was taken that respondent no. 1 has further sub-let ..... were no allegations made in the petition that this has been done by respondent no. 1 without the written consent of the landlord after coming into force of the act and as such, the allegations in this regard were silent and no such pleadings were there, which were necessary as per the requirement of the provisions mentioned above. ..... or10. it is, therefore, clear that the two things which are required to be proved are that firstly, the tenant has transferred his rights after the commencement of this act without written consent of the landlord and secondly, that he has parted with possession of any portion of the tenanted premises. thus, it has to be alleged and proved .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2009 (HC)

High Court of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Shri Manoj Kumar Bansal and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-09-2009

..... there is no appeal and this court can go into question of fact. he relies upon the decision in indian airlines ltd. v. prabha d. kanan : (2007)iillj113sc holding:44. but, in a case of this nature although there is no provision for appeal, but even in a judicial review, the court may require the ..... jurisdiction, power and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. but that finding must be based on some evidence. neither the technical rules of evidence act nor of proof of fact or evidence as defined therein, apply to disciplinary proceeding. when the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receives support therefrom, the disciplinary ..... said shri manoj kumar bansal had decidedthe application without jurisdiction in order to favour shri r.s. parmar, advocate,and thereby committed grave judicial impropriety and thereby acted in a mannerhighly unbecoming of a judicial officer.84.prima-facie the delinquent had no jurisdiction togrant bail in rape case. the bail order on that ground .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 2009 (HC)

Smt. Bimla Devi Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-24-2009

Reported in : AIR2009HP73

..... .46. this court in rsa no. 24 of 1996 titled as abida begam v. state of h.p. and anr. decided on 19th october, 2007 has held that negligence is the breach of a duty caused by omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate ..... of torts, ratanlal and dhirajlal (edited by justice g. p. singh), referred to hereinabove, holds good. negligence becomes actionable on account of injury resulting from the act or omission amounting to negligence attributable to the person sued. the essential components of negligence are three : 'duty', 'breach' and 'resulting damage'.(2) a simple ..... a reasonable man guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs would not do. negligence becomes actionable on account of injury resulting from the act or omission amounting to negligence attributable to the person sued. the essential components of negligence, as 'recognized are three: 'duty'. 'breach' and, 'respiting damage .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2009 (HC)

Jagat Ram Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-02-2009

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3271

..... the appellant has taken two contradictory irreconcilable circumstances of evidence firstly, that no such incident had taken place and the other pleading that the circumstances show that the act was consented as she was major at the time of the alleged incident. unfortunately, it is not so. the consent in the instant case is not at all ..... the entries, which were made by him in official discharge of his duties in the register aforesaid is relevant document and admissible, under section 35 of the evidence act and his statement cannot be doubted in absence of any allegation made against him.20. the learned counsel for the appellant has referred to the statement of p. ..... under sections 366 and 376 read with section 34 of the indian penal code and under section 3 of the prevention of atrocities (scheduled castes and scheduled tribes) act.9. the learned trial court, prima facie found the existence of the ingredients of the offences punishable under sections 363, 366 and 376 of the indian penal code .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //