Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 24 amendment of section 31 Court: rajasthan Page 5 of about 1,353 results (0.143 seconds)

Jan 07 2010 (HC)

Rajasthan High Court Non-gazetted Ministerial Staff Association Throug ...

Court : Rajasthan

..... inference can be drawn from the consequences which may occurre due to the decision in question. the decision in question certainly increases the qualification for competition and excludes lesser qualified persons. the subject is relevant and that has been made compulsory with higher qualification resulting into allowing more qualified persons to compete ..... the optional subject in graduation or lower division clerks with hindi and english literature as subject in post graduation and having minimum experience of five years.competitive examination- a qualifying examination shall be held to test the ability of the candidates of translation from english to hindi and hindu to english.paper ..... that the petitioner's representation was also before the high court, obviously before hon'ble the chief justice, who pleased to amend the rule vide notification dated 8.9.2009. for any official act, there is presumption that it has been done after due care and application of mind, however, that can be rebutted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2004 (HC)

Mukesh Garg (Dr.) and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1718; 2004(3)WLC639

..... also referred prospectus/instructions so issued by the respondents wherein item no. 1 provide different reservations and out of which, after leaving 25% seats for open competition, remaining seats are divided in equal ratio between 'in-service' and open market which is termed as 'general seats'. so far as the reservation of ..... submissions made on behalf of the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the government has power to issue instructions without amending the ordinance 278-e of the rajasthan university act. under ordinance 278-e clause (iv(ii), there was no such fixed reservation provided for inservice candidates and it was referred ..... -service' candidates. out of total seats meant for p.g. course, 25% of the total seats are filled on all india basis competition which is called as 'all india competitive entrance examination' and 50% seats are filled from amongst the 'in-service' candidates of rajasthan medical and health state service in various specialities .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 1983 (HC)

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. the State Transport ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1983WLN(UC)184

..... once say that the considerations which apply to a private bus operator who happens to be a monopolist are not applicable to the corporation. the act was amended by the motor vehicles (rajasthan amendment) act (rajasthan act no. x of 1974) whereby the following proviso has been added to sub-section (2) of section 58 of the ..... unnationalised routes.since i have found that the criticism of the tribunal against the corporation is justified and in that context permitting the private bus operators to have competition with the corporation on these routes would result in providing better facilities to the traveling public, i am of the opinion that the judgment of the tribunal ..... on this route and if private operator are allowed to ply six vehicles alongwith the 18 permits of the corporation then the public would benefit as the healthy competition would result in the efficient services without any set back to the service of the corporation. recently, the rsrtc has come in for severe criticism from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

Virendra Ragwani Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... , this court while laying down the law, has necessarily to hold that unless the appointment is in terms of the relevant rules and after a proper competition among qualified persons, the same would not confer any right on the appointee. if it is a contractual appointment, the appointment comes to an end at ..... test for all categories of service except drivers and class iv. [the examination shall be conducted as per directions of the state govt. the syllabus for competitive examination for direct recruitment to the post of [school teachers class 1 to 5 shall be as specified in schedule ii and teachers classes 6 to ..... of governance. the amendment aforesaid was a landmark step to satisfy directives of the state -2- policy enshrined under the constitution. with an object to bring a law relating to panchayati raj institution in conformity with the constitutional status granted to such institutions, the rajasthan state legislature enacted rajasthan panchayati raj act, 1994 (hereinafter referred .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

Archana Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... , this court while laying down the law, has necessarily to hold that unless the appointment is in terms of the relevant rules and after a proper competition among qualified persons, the same would not confer any right on the appointee. if it is a contractual appointment, the appointment comes to an end at ..... test for all categories of service except drivers and class iv. [the examination shall be conducted as per directions of the state govt. the syllabus for competitive examination for direct recruitment to the post of [school teachers class 1 to 5 shall be as specified in schedule ii and teachers classes 6 to ..... of governance. the amendment aforesaid was a landmark step to satisfy directives of the state -2- policy enshrined under the constitution. with an object to bring a law relating to panchayati raj institution in conformity with the constitutional status granted to such institutions, the rajasthan state legislature enacted rajasthan panchayati raj act, 1994 (hereinafter referred .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

Ranveer Deharu Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... , this court while laying down the law, has necessarily to hold that unless the appointment is in terms of the relevant rules and after a proper competition among qualified persons, the same would not confer any right on the appointee. if it is a contractual appointment, the appointment comes to an end at ..... test for all categories of service except drivers and class iv. [the examination shall be conducted as per directions of the state govt. the syllabus for competitive examination for direct recruitment to the post of [school teachers class 1 to 5 shall be as specified in schedule ii and teachers classes 6 to ..... of governance. the amendment aforesaid was a landmark step to satisfy directives of the state -2- policy enshrined under the constitution. with an object to bring a law relating to panchayati raj institution in conformity with the constitutional status granted to such institutions, the rajasthan state legislature enacted rajasthan panchayati raj act, 1994 (hereinafter referred .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

State and ors Vs. Archana

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... , this court while laying down the law, has necessarily to hold that unless the appointment is in terms of the relevant rules and after a proper competition among qualified persons, the same would not confer any right on the appointee. if it is a contractual appointment, the appointment comes to an end at ..... test for all categories of service except drivers and class iv. [the examination shall be conducted as per directions of the state govt. the syllabus for competitive examination for direct recruitment to the post of [school teachers class 1 to 5 shall be as specified in schedule ii and teachers classes 6 to ..... of governance. the amendment aforesaid was a landmark step to satisfy directives of the state -2- policy enshrined under the constitution. with an object to bring a law relating to panchayati raj institution in conformity with the constitutional status granted to such institutions, the rajasthan state legislature enacted rajasthan panchayati raj act, 1994 (hereinafter referred .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

Nagendra Singh Chouhan Vs. State of Raj. and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... , this court while laying down the law, has necessarily to hold that unless the appointment is in terms of the relevant rules and after a proper competition among qualified persons, the same would not confer any right on the appointee. if it is a contractual appointment, the appointment comes to an end at ..... test for all categories of service except drivers and class iv. [the examination shall be conducted as per directions of the state govt. the syllabus for competitive examination for direct recruitment to the post of [school teachers class 1 to 5 shall be as specified in schedule ii and teachers classes 6 to ..... of governance. the amendment aforesaid was a landmark step to satisfy directives of the state -2- policy enshrined under the constitution. with an object to bring a law relating to panchayati raj institution in conformity with the constitutional status granted to such institutions, the rajasthan state legislature enacted rajasthan panchayati raj act, 1994 (hereinafter referred .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 1982 (HC)

Vichitra Banwarilal Meena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1982Raj297; 1982()WLN294

..... bench of five judges was constituted. chandrachud. c.j., and gupta, untwalia and kailasam. jj. held that section 4 of the constitution 42nd amendment act was bevond the amending power of parliament and was void, since it damaged the basic and essential features of the constitution and destroyed its basic structure by a total exclusion ..... rao v. union of india (air 1981 sc 271) (supra). chandrachud, c.j., krishna iyer, tulzapurkar and sen, jj. held that the constitution 1st amendment act, 1951 which introduced article 31a in the constitution did not damage or destroy the basic structure of the constitution. chandrachud, c.j., who delivered the majority judgment ..... less-privileged citizens are those who are still outcasle from the realm of courts, justice and law, as they cannot afford to reach and spend in competition of the privileged resourceful, educated and enlightened litigants, nor can they afford to await in long queue. that being so, even though they deserve consideration .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2008 (HC)

Gautam Morarka (Dr.) and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(3)Raj2742

..... was there is the instruction booklet but further deduction of one mark of right answer on account of wrong answer would amount to double jeopardy and that too, in competition where for one seat two or more than two candidates are waiting for their turn even after obtaining equivalent marks. hence, the negative marking system is arbitrary on this ..... been held to be source recruitment in between open market and in-service candidates.32. mr. s.p. sharma in view of the said judgment as well as amended ordinance 278-e and g of the rajasthan university does not press his argument that in ordinance 278-e and g of the university of rajasthan as adopted by the ..... 15.5.2007 and dbsaw no. 310/2004 : (rlw 2005(1) raj. 1043) dr. deepak goyal v. university of rajasthan and ors. decided on 28.2.2005.9. the second preliminary objection raised by counsel for the respondents is that the present cases relate to academic matter for which the health university under the rajasthan health university act, 2005 is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //