Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 24 amendment of section 31 Court: karnataka Page 13 of about 8,049 results (0.174 seconds)

K.V. Amarnath and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR730; 1998(5)KarLJ62

..... of facts and circumstances and the position of law noted herein before would show the existence of the following circumstances before the passing of the impugned amendment rules--(a) that the karnataka excise act had been enacted to provide for a well-known law relating to the production, manufacture, possession, import, export, transport, purchase and sale of ..... to msil, a substantial rebate in excise will be lost and the goods manufactured by the appellants will become far more expensive and therefore, will become much less competitive in the outside market. there is a similar provision relating to rebate in sales-tax which also the appellants will lose. there is no doubt that this will ..... the monopoly in liquor trade. such trade was decided to be made open in order to have competition to earn more revenue to the exchequer which is termed to be one of the main objects of the karnataka excise act and the rules made thereunder. it is declared that the object to do away with the monopoly .....

Balasaheb Venkatesh Khasbagh Alias Kulkarni Vs. Land Tribunal

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR3898; 1985(2)KarLJ569

..... a) a person who cultivates personally any land on lease under a lease created contrary to the provisions of section 5 and before the date of commencement of the amendment act ;(iii) a person who is a permanent tenant ; and(iv) a person who is a protected tenant.explanation : - a person who takes up a ..... assembly on 23-2-1956, the prize competitions act, 1955, central act 42 of 1955 was adopted by the state of mysore. the mysore act 26 of 1957 dealing with the prize competitions control and tax amendment was challenged on the ground that in view of the central act dealing with the prize competitions, the state legislature had surrendered its ..... rights of legislation in favour of the parliament and, therefore, the mysore act was void. the argument .....

Anjuman-e-tarreqi-e-funkaran-e-urdu, Bangalore Vs. State of Karnataka ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR710; 2000(2)KarLJ456

..... petition, the petitioner states that passing of paper i kannada main examination part b in terms of schedule ii to the karnataka recruitment of gazetted probationers (appointment by competitive examinations) rules, 1997 is in violation of articles 14, 19, 29 , 30 and 350-a of the constitution of india. it is further contended that ..... as prescribing passing of kannada paper for the main examination vide annexure-b.(b) declare schedule ii of the karnataka recruitment of gazetted probationers (appointment by competitive examinations) rules, 1997 insofar as prescribing the written examination paper i kannada under the head main examination is ultra vires to the rights guaranteed to the ..... articles 29 and 30. in the state of then madras, the state government insisted on the account being written in the local language by amending section 10 of the then madras pawnbrokers act of 1943. in m. kevalchand sowcar v state of madras and others, sub-section (2) of section 10 was questioned as being .....

Jindal thermal Power Company Ltd. Vs. Karnataka Power Transmission Cor ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR3463; 2004(5)KarLJ161

..... till the ppa was signed with kptcl. after the ppa was entered into with kptcl and after the exist of the foreign shareholders, the appellant and the jvsl amended the terms of the agreement. the dpr provides that the peak requirement of the steel plant is only 150 mw and the balance of 110 mw would be ..... restated power purchase agreement was entered into by jindal vijayanagar steel limited (jvsl) and the appellant for supply of power, which agreement was subsequently amended on 12th december, 2001. on 22nd december, 1995, gok, in support of the project, conveyed its approval for allotment of land by ksidc. on 23rd january, ..... an efficient, economic and competitive manner; to provide reliable quality power and to protect the interests of the consumers including vesting in the commission the power to regulate the activities of the power sector in the state and other matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. the statement of objects and reasons of the act reflects this position loudly. .....

Airports Authroity Employees Union Regd No 3515 Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... concession agreements with the respective ppp partners of bengaluru and hyderabad airports and received concession fee @ 4% of their annual gross revenue. the aai act was further amended in 2003 and section 12a was inserted therein which empowers aai with the approval of the government to lease out the premises of an airport to ..... the cost of their engagement also very high. this resulted in many indian players, having experience in other sectors, showing disinterest for such transaction leaving the competition limited only to indian airport operators. therefore, the requirement of operations and management experience was not made mandatory in the present request for proposal. even in ..... state of m.p. v. narmada bachao andolan (2011) 7 scc639iii) k.d.sharma v. sail (2008) 12 scc481iv) arunima baruah v. union of india (2007) 6 scc120in light of the aforesaid judgments, the petition deserves to be dismissed. 4627. the kerala high court has dealt in detail the issue of leasing out of the .....

Arya Vysya Srirama Co-operative Society Limited, Shimoga and Others Vs ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2001KAR2524

..... of section 57(2-a) and 57(2-b) by this court will operate prospectively. (ii) i declare sections 17(1)(c) and 29(1)(c) of the amended act 25 of 1998 only insofar as the explanation 'near relation' which includes (i), (ii), (iii) in section 29-g(f) which defines 'near relation' as unconstitutional ..... instances have been cited before this court in the counter-affidavit to show that there was instance of 'near relations' indulging in unhealthy competition with the co-operative society. the act has been in force since 1959 and not a single instance has been brought to the notice of this court that the co-operative movement ..... -co-operative relationship and help the coordinated functioning of the co-operative movement in various sectors, to convene state co-operative conferences, seminars, meetings, workshops and conduct competitions in schools and colleges, to acquire, purchase, own or dispose of immovable property by way of sale, lease, exchange or otherwise for the furtherance of the objects .....

Registered Unaided Private Schools Management Association Karnataka Vs ...

Court : Karnataka

..... writ petition is filed under articles226& 227 of the constitution of india praying to declare that section16of the right of children to free and compulsory education act, 2009 (as amended by the amendment act of2019 is ultra vires the parent legislation. & etc. in wp no.3636 0f2023between: smt.gayathri k.s w/o late nagaraju r aged about52years ..... section 16 of the rte act was enacted keeping ..... rte act states that no child shall be expelled from the school till competition of elementary education. at this stage, it is also important to once again look into section 30 of the rte act, which states that no child shall be required to pass any board examination till completion of elementary education.46. the amendment to .....

Ranganatha Industries Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2008)11VST240(Karn)

..... since the assessing authority in the light of the decision rendered by the joint commissioner who was subsequently re-designated as additional commissioner in view of the amendment made to the act by means of act no. 5 of 1993 with effect from november 9, 1992 the joint commissioner who had passed the impugned order could not have exercised his revisional power under ..... (central act no. lxiii of 1948), but excludes,--(i) handicrafts manufacturing units (ii) hand-loom weaving units and (iii) any other group or class of industries which may with reference to their nature, competitiveness, employment potential or such other factors, be notified by the state government. explanation ii.--the words 'raw materials, component parts and inputs' do not include agricultural produce, horticultural .....

M.G. Maheshwara Rao and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2002KAR3848; 2004(3)KarLJ187

..... junior judgment writers. what is prohibited by rule 3(2)(b) of the general recruitment rules is assessment of comparative merit of candidates by holding a competitive examination for selection, when promotion is by seniority-cum-merit. rule 3(2)(b) doss not prohibit ascertainment as to whether the candidate is fit for ..... writer/personal secretary to registrar. if a provision relating to promotion in the parallel feeder channel (which ultimately leads to the common seniority list) is amended by the tribunal, by an interpretation, which according to the petitioners is erroneous, and if they feel that the decision of the tribunal will affect ..... judgment writers and change the minimum qualification prescribed by the state. in this case, instead of considering whether the qualification prescribed is arbitrary, the tribunal has acted beyond its jurisdiction in deleting a qualification (of degree) prescribed under the rules.20. similarly, when the rules prescribe that the promotion from, the cadre .....

Dr. D.K. Seethalakshmi, Vs. the Director Karnataka Institute of Medica ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Reported in : 2012(3)KCCR75(SN)

..... stealing a march over merit and over writ petitioners, unless she has been so selected in a merit based open competition selection process. 27. that having not happened, but the 4th respondent having only receivival the patronization of the government ..... to government, health and family welfare department, copy produced as annexure-m to the petition, along with the application for amendment. 8. such an order was in respect of several officials like 4th respondent, many of whom were professors, assistant professors ..... have already filled up and a promotion against existing vacancy having been happened for the first time in the year 2007, any seniority list whether directly or indirectly indicating the interse seniority position of petitioners vis--vis the 4th respondent ..... to the plight of filing these petitions and respondents giving the cause to present these writ petitions by their arbitrary act. 30. both petitions are allowed, levying costs of rs.5,000/- each on the 1st respondent and the .....