Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 24 amendment of section 31 Court: gujarat Page 92 of about 942 results (0.591 seconds)

Kumudiniben. D. Chopda and ors. Vs. the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporatio ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1989Guj11; (1988)1GLR266

..... it was directed that the award should be passed within reasonable time. it may be-noted that the land acquisition act amended by act no. 68 of 1984 which came into force on sept. 24. 1985. as per this amendment, in respect of notification issued earlier if award is passed within two years from the date of coming into force ..... get the society registered. therefore the same has been registered as mukta madhu owners' association as a non-trading corporation under the provisions of the bombay nontrading corporations act. sometime in september 1982. petitioners of special civil application no. 7130 of 1985 are members of this association. the land on which the construction stands is part ..... of the amendment the notification should not lapse. in the instant case the award has been passed on aug. 23, 1986 .....

Rajiyabanu Wife of Hyder @ Bhura Gulam HussaIn Shaikh Vs. Police Commi ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1989)1GLR18

..... stated that the ground which he has raised now was not raised in the petition earlier, but he has sought our permission to amend the petition for the purpose and we have granted him permission to amend the petition. accordingly, the said additional ground has been raised in the petition as para-8a. according to the said contention of ..... detaining authority has passed the impugned order on his being satisfied with respect to said hyder @ bhura gulam hussain shaikh that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order in the area of ahmedabad city it was necessary to make order directing that the said hyder @ bhura ..... mr. patel, the provisions of section 12(1) of the act are not complied with inasmuch as the report of the advisory board was .....

Mochi Narsinhbhai Gandabhai Vs. Shah Motilal Himatlal

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1977)18GLR542

..... and permitted increases till the suit is finally decided. the mandatory interpretation would clearly frustrate the whole purpose of this remedial measure where even after the 1953 amendment the legislature intends to protect the tenant by conferring adequate protection on the tenant falling under the residuary clause under section 12(3)(b).having taken into ..... rent accrued after a lapse of 12 month. under the circumstances aforesaid, he is completely entitled to the protection under section 12(3)(b) of the rent act.15. as a result of the aforesaid discussion, i set aside the impugned decree of eviction passed by the lower appellate court against the peti tioner-tenant, ..... tenant. under the circumstances, no doubt, it is open to the opponent-landlord to minute the tenancy on any grounds available to him under the rent act, but for the purpose of deciding as to whether the petitioner-tenant regularly paid the rent to the opponent-landlord, the court must necessarily take into consideration .....

Regional Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. New Asarw ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1983)2GLR1174

..... with the question whether the payments made to the employees towards the authorised leave were wages as defined by the provision of section 2(22) of the esi act before its amendment by act no. 44 of 1966 we are of the opinion that having regard to the genusis of this payment, the payment of wages and dearness allowance to ..... of the unsubstituted festival, religious and national holidays is 'wages' within the meaning of section 2(22) of the employees' state insurance act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the esi act') as it stood prior to its amendment by act no. 44 of 1966. the question arises in the following circumstances:1. before the employees' state insurance court (hereinafter referred to as ..... on him by the nature of his employment; or(d) any gratuity payable on discharge;it should be noted at this stage that by act no. 44 of 1966, section 2(22) was amended with effect from june 17, 1967 and not from 28th january, 1968 as observed by the learned single judge. on mere reading of the .....

Manubhai D. Shah Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1981Guj15; (1981)0GLR206

..... that it violated the due process clause. the american supreme court held that such a municipal ordinance did not violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment because it did not impose an unreasonable restraint on the right to engage in a legitimate occupation. in that context, it has been observed by the ..... statute in reference to the rights guaranteed under article 19(1), but it is the reality and substance which determine its constitutionality. section 3 of the act with which the supreme court was concerned in the hamdard dawakhana case (supra) inter alia prohibited the publication of all advertisements referring to certain drugs specified in ..... demands equality and absence of arbitrariness and discrimination in such transactions'. there should be fairness and equality in the activities of the government. the government cannot act arbitrarily at its sweet will' and cannot deal with a person in any manner it pleases. its action must be in conformity with the standard or .....

Varshaben Panchabhai Nakum Vs. State of Gujarat and 2 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2008)1GLR799

..... the minimum standard of any of physical endurance test/physical measurement examination, he shall be disqualified to participate in further tests/competition.22. having heard the learned counsel for the parties, two points emerge out for adjudication. one relates to physical ..... and obscurity in the entire process and as a matter of fact, the high court has suggested incorporation of proper amendments in the rules so as to avoid confusion and obscurity. we are however constrained to note that having come to ..... main written test and was also called for physical test. last phase of recruitment process is to start from 4.5.2007, where the petitioner is not called. adequate number of reserved candidates are not called for interview. according to the petitioner ..... and the members taking the oral test and dividing the marks under different and specific subheads, the gpsc committed any impropriety or acted arbitrarily in holding the oral test.(2) madan lal v. state of j & k and ors. reported in : [1995 .....

Shree Yogkshem Foundation for Human Dignity Vs. State of Gujarat and O ...

Court : Gujarat

..... the aforesaid scheme statutory by providing, inter alia, that the candidates selected by direct selection or as a result of a competitive examination, shall be appointed on contractual basis and at the end of the contractual period, they should be appointed in ..... of rs. 462 crore per annum.6.2 in furtherance of the aforesaid scheme of fixed-pay, the state government has amended the gujarat civil services classification and recruitment [general] rules, 1967 [hereafter to be referred to as the rules] framed ..... others (supra) cannot have any application. in the said case, the question whether the tribunal constituted under the administrative tribunals act are vested with power to entertain public interest litigation. the reason assigned in the case of dr. duryodhan sahu and others ..... drugs and pharmaceuticals ltd. v. workmen, indian drugs and pharmaceuticals ltd., reported in [2007] 1 scc 408 [relevant paras 38 to 53][c] s.c. chandra and others. v state of jharkhand and others, reported .....

Pandya Jashwantlal M. and ors. Vs. District Superintendent of Police a ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1990)1GLR515

..... under section 5 of the bombay police act the government of gujarat enacted the constable (armed branch, unarmed branch and women branch) recruitment rules, 1979. the requisite educational qualification for appointment to the post of armed police constable was std. vi passed, but by the amendment in the said rules, by the constable ..... appointment. considering the recruitment rules, it is apparent that these candidates satisfying all the requisite qualifications are included in the select list after the competitive test found fit to the appointed for the post of armed constable and only a formal appointment order is required to be issued by the ..... the district superintendent of police, sabarkantha respondent no. 3, cancelled the select list. it transpires that the select list was cancelled as, by the amendment, the requisite educational qualification incorporated is secondary school certificate examination passed or its equivalent. it is not necessary for this court to consider as to .....

Torrent Power Limited Vs. Abhisar Developers and Others

Court : Gujarat

..... recovered after adjusting the expenses to recover such dues. 8. after hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the provisions contained in the third amendment of gujarat electricity regulatory commission [electricity supply code and related matters] regulations, 2010, by which clause 4.1.11 has been introduced in modified form, we ..... propose to follow the views of the two three-judge bench decisions mentioned above and find that in the act of 2003, there being no provision of imposing the liability of a defaulter upon the third party, the amended regulation relied upon by the appellant herein is not only prospective in operation but also inconsistent with the provisions ..... 513/-, making a total of rs.77,96,169/-. the outstanding dues including interest/delayed payment charges came to rs.4,41,42,422/- as on 31st march 2007. 2.2 the immovable properties of the said m/s. new gujarat synthetic mills co. limited were purchased by one m/s. star associates in a winding .....

Airport Authority of India Vs. Ushaben Shirishbhai Shah and 6 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2010)1GLR321

ORDER119. The plaintiffs are entitled to recover jointly and severally from the National Aviation of Company India Ltd. ('the Airlines' for short) and the Airport Authority of India compensation of Rs. 7,53,000/- (Rupees Seven lacs fifty three thousand only) with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing the suit till the date of deposit/payment. The plaintiffs are also entitled to recover their costs as already determined in the decree of the trial Court in one set, as explained in the preceding para.The defendants shall bear their own costs of the suit as well as of these appeals.120. The Indian Airlines Corporation (now the National Aviation Company of India Ltd.) and the Airport Authority of India are held jointly and severally liable to pay the aforesaid amount of compensation with interest and costs.121. The amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- paid by the Indian Airline Corporation to the plaintiffs as well as the amount deposited by the Airport Authority before the trial...