Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 section 4 entry of names in the register Court: uttaranchal Page 1 of about 1 results (0.026 seconds)

Eveready Industries India Ltd. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2008)17VST18(NULL)

..... has been made in the notification dated february 21, 1997.6. the grievance of the petitioner is that after enforcement of the vat act on october 1, 2005, the principal secretary finance, uttaranchal, sent a letter no. 01/xxvii(8)/vat/2005 dated january 4, 2006 thereby the exemption under section 4a of ..... .13. brief facts, giving rise to the present writ petition, are that the petitioner is a public limited company incorporated in the indian companies act and is registered under the uttaranchal (u.p. trade tax act, 1948) as adopted by uttaranchal adaptation and modification order, 2002 and is also registered under the central sales ..... eligibility certificate had been granted on august 22, 2001.21. according to the petitioner, the petitioner is a public limited company incorporated in the indian companies act registered under the uttaranchal (u.p. trade tax act, 1948) as adopted by uttaranchal adaptation and modification order, 2002. the petitioner is also registered under the central sales .....

M/S. Garhwal Motor Owners Union Limited Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... to continue for the whole of the month and will deemed to have retired on the last day of the month. the respondent prasanna lal uniyal was the secretary of the workers union and he had submitted a charter of demand on 9-12-1986 and he was one of the signatory on behalf of workers in ..... counter affidavits and denied the contents of the writ petitions. it is not disputed that certified standing orders, certified under the industrial employment(standing orders) act, 1946 are applicable in the petitioner company and which govern the conditions of service of its employees. it is further alleged that the standing orders are silent about the age of retirement. ..... that the owners of buses put their buses into one pool which is known as garhwal motors owners union limited kotdwara. the buses belong to individual members and company charges commission for plying those buses and is engaged in the business of running of vehicles for carrying passengers and their transportation in the garhwal region. the .....

Karan Pal Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC209(UHC)

..... alleged in the writ petition that the petitioner's record has been outstanding and unblemished. the teletronix limited was a government owned company registered under section 617 of the indian companies act and is a subsidiary of kumaon mandal vikas nigam limited (respondent no. 3). the government of uttar pradesh vide its ..... and letter dated 25th april, 1996 (copy annexure-5 to the writ petition) which was also issued by the principal secretary, uttarakhand vikas vibhag, government of u. p. to the principal secretary, labour, government of u. p. for issuing appropriate direction for absorption of 23 technicians in different industrial training institutes ..... a technical diploma certificate from industrial training institute in the year 1975. on the basis of said qualification, initially the petitioner was appointed in january, 1980 on daily wages as technician with the teletronix limited, bhimtal, district nainital (respondent no. 4). thereafter, with effect from 1st january 1981, the .....

Rai Bahadur Narayan Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2007Utr36

..... has further been stated by the petitioner that the recommendation for purchase of 34.54806 hectare of land was given by the district magistrate to the chief secretary, land resources branch (revenue), uttaranchal government vide letter dated 8-12-2004. the said recommendation letter dated 8-12-2004 is quoted below:(vernacular matter ..... 2 and 3 respectively.4. brief facts of the case;, as narrated in writ petition no. 712 of 2006 (m/s), are that the petitioner company sought permission for purchasing agricultural/horticultural land situated in village sikkar, bukkanpur and gopalpur, tehsil roorkee, district haridwar from uttaranchal government for the purposes of establishing ..... basis of the minimum value determined in accordance with the said rules and return the instrument for presenting again in accordance with section 23 of the registration act, 1908.15. a perusal of rules 340, 341 and 349 of the stamp rules provide the guidelines while deciding the question with regard to deficiency .....

Uttaranchal Iron and Ispat Ltd. Vs. Trade Tax Tribunal, Dehradun Bench ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2008)13VST245(NULL)

..... of application of such unit.(2) the state government may constitute the following committees for the disposal of application for grant of eligibility certificate:(1) secretaries, committee.(2) state level committee.(3) divisional level committee.(4) divisional level industrial development authority committee.(5) district level committee.(6) district level ..... eligibility certificate has already been granted on the decision of the committee referred in sub-rule (2) of rule 25 in favour of transferor-company, the officer competent to grant the eligibility certificate shall compute the unexpired portion of period during which the production was closed and after computing that ..... competent to issue the certificate and authorities empowered to receive application and call for further details.14. sub-section (2b) of section 4a of the act requires the successor-manufacturer to apply to the officer competent to grant eligibility certificate under clause (d) of sub-section (2) which provides that .....

Amitabh Textile Mills Ltd. Vs. Official Liquidator and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : [2010]153CompCas715(Uttaranchal)

..... creditors. it has further been averred that after filing of the draft rehabilitation scheme with the learned single judge, a meeting was held under the aegis of the secretary industrial, uttarakhand, on july 7, 2005, i.e., prior to the passing of the impugned order on july 29, 2005.16. on the basis of ..... anr.2. the relevant facts of the case are that the appellant amitabh textile mills ltd. (atml) is registered under the companies act, 1956, having its registered office at prem nagar, dehradun. the company was established for manufacture of cotton and synthetic yarn and it started production in july, 1960. the government of uttar pradesh extended ..... of the employees state insurance corporation (esic).15. it has further been averred in the affidavit that the scheme of rehabilitation/settlement as filed by the appellant-company through its directors also envisaged payments to certain other creditors, as also redemption of shares which includes the state of u.p., upsidc, uttaranchal trade tax .....

Commissioner of Income-tax and anr. Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporatio ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2007)207CTR(Uttranchal)651; [2006]282ITR520(Uttaranchal)

..... 31, 1983 see [1983] 142 itr 88, and the letter of o.n.g.c. no. 0-19011/3/89-ong/do dated august 2, 1989, addressed to the joint secretary (ftd), central board of direct taxes, new delhi. the government has clarified that o.n.g.c. and oil india ltd., are persons authorised by the central government in the ..... facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned income-tax appellate tribunal was legally correct to hold that the assessee was not liable to surtax under the companies (profits) surtax act, 1964, by virtue of exemption available under notification no. g.s.r. 307(e), dated march 31, 1983 see [1983] 142 itr 88, issued under section 24aa of the ..... s.t.a. no. 17 (delhi) of 1992 (hereinafter referred to as 'the tribunal'), whereby the tribunal has held that the assessee was not liable to surtax under the companies (profits) surtax act, 1964, by virtue of exemption available under notification no. g.s.r. 307(e), dated march 31, 1983 see [1983] 142 itr 88, issued under section 24aa of .....

Tehri Hydro Development Corporation Ltd., thro' G.M. Vs. Presiding Off ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2005)ILLJ493UC

..... early seventies irrigation department of state of u. p. started working on tehri dam project. later the same was entrusted to thdc which is a government company incorporated under the companies act, 1956. it is also stated in para 5 of the writ petition that by order dated june 16, 1989 (copy annexure-3 to the writ petition ..... to the said corporation. accordingly, in pursuance of the decision dated august 21, 1989 (copy annexure-5 to the writ petition), taken by the secretary, power, government of india and chief secretary, government of u.p., the thdc invited options from the work-charged / muster roll employees of the irrigation department for their absorption in the ..... june 16, 1989. subsequently in a high powered meeting held on august 21, 1989 (copy of minutes annexure-5 to the writ petition) between secretary, power, government of india and chief secretary of state of u. p., it was decided that irrigation department of government of u.p. should transfer service of all 1248 employees. as .....

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... eligibility were also prescribed.2. in so far as the procedural aspect of the matter is concerned, interested parties were to be required to submit an application to the secretary, ministry of information and broadcasting. if the applicant was found eligible (for setting up a 'direct-to-home' (dth) platform in india) on the basis of ..... government could recover entertainment tax from 'direct-to-home' (dth) broadcasting operators, and as such, it was concluded, that the levy of entertainment tax on the petitioner company under the entertainment act, 1979, was impermissible in law.10. this court, while disposing of writ petition (m/s) no. 3 53 of 2008, distinguished 'cable services' from 'direct ..... purposes of another act. it may also be that in a given case, on the facts of that case, a particular activity can be treated as 'service' but in a different fact situation the same could be sale under the same statute. in northern india caterers (india) ltd. v. lt. governor of delhi : (1980) 2 scc .....

Zestha Developers Ltd. Vs. State of Uttarakhand

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2009Utr50

..... of the petitioner.4. relevant facts, giving rise to the present writ petitions, in brief are that according to the petitioner, the petitioner is a company registered under indian companies act, 1956. the petitioner is engaged in the business of developing residential colonies. the petitioner entered into negotiations for purchase of land in tehsil kichha district udham ..... petitioner made an application to the district magistrate on 25-5-2007 requesting for extension of time. the application of the petitioner was referred to the principal secretary (revenue) of the government. the district government counsel gave his opinion on 18-12-2007 to the effect that since the approval for purchase of land was ..... . rudrapur. the report was received on 29-8-2006. the application was sent to the additional secretary, revenue, government of uttarakhand for approval under section 154(4)(3)(a) of the u.p.z.a. and l.r. act 1950 by letter no. 1161 dated 6-8-2006. permission was accorded by the government by g .....