Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 chapter x miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 6 of about 386 results (0.072 seconds)

G.Pandi. Vs. the Commissioner, and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... collect necessary funds from the plot owners, who purchased the plots in the impugned layout for maintenance of the park.17. we also direct the chief secretary, local administration department, state of tamil nadu to communicate the copy of this order to all the local bodies to scrupulously apply and follow the above ..... division bench of this court in karpaga nagar nala urimai sangam, rep. by its secretary, shanmugavel v. municipal administration and water supply department, rep. by its secretary, chennai and others , 2007 (4) mlj 1006, after considering in detail the provisions of the act, has held that the open space earmarked for public purpose cannot be altered. ..... was demarcated and shown as residential area. as there was difference in the classification in respect of 1975 plan and 1980 plan, the local planning authority cancelled the 1975 plan with a direction that the 1980 plan alone would be valid. however, fresh application was submitted for putting up construction in plot nos. 276 .....

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Express Transport Corporation ...

Court : Chennai

..... come out with the plea at the later point of time that the non payment of higher salary in the cadre of company secretary was contrary to law and also opposed to public policy, since he is estopped by his own act or conduct which precludes him from asserting a right which by his implied conduct unerringly point out that he would not ..... therefore bde unenforceable in view of section 23 of the contract act,1872. 31. in this connection, the first respondent/petitioner in his letter dated 01.02.2011 addressed to the appellant/tamil nadu state express transport corporation ltd., chennai has, inter alia, referred to his earlier experience working as company secretary in the tamil nadu state transport development corporation ltd., chennai and .....

V.Dilip Kumar Vs. State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Polic.

Court : Chennai

..... the respondent who had taken recourse to suppressio veri deserves serious condemnation.(iv) sanction for prosecution granted by company secretary and order did not refer to any order/resolution of board of company pursuant to which company secretary was authorised by board of directors to convey the sanction. subsequently, another sanction order came to be ..... a managing director in absence of the managing director to be appointed under section 12 of m.p. rajya beej evam farm vjkas nigam adhiniyam, 1980 (for short the adhiniyam). it appears that there was a discussion in the meeting regarding power to the board to grant sanction and the board ..... was treated as hostile witness. (xii) the following table shows the details of the loan and loanees:sl.no.name of the loanees s.b.act.no.loan dateamountwithdrawal slipreceived by1. ravi20594.10.199112530ex.p11a4/kumaresan2. mohan21146.12.199112500ex.p20a4/kumaresan3. sampath21086.12.199112500ex.p41a4/kumaresan4. raju21076.12.199112500ex.p56a4/kumaresan5 .....

A. Rajalakshmi and Others Vs. Sengammal and Others

Court : Chennai

..... the sub court, coimbatore, transferred the records relating to the case, to the district munsif court, coimbatore, in view of an amendment brought forth by tamil nadu act 34 of 1980. the suit was assigned a new number o.s.no.420 of 1981. (vii) the plaintiffs filed an application in i.a.no.2345 of 1982 in o ..... thiruvaiyaru. t.k.narayanaswamy iyer's father t.n.kothandarama iyer, who himself had settled down at mettupalayam, left substantial properties. t.k. narayanaswamy iyer was a paid secretary in one ranga raja bank ltd., at mettupalayam on a monthly salary of rs.50/-. he also had money lending transactions. all the transactions were out of the ..... all the properties including those covered by the documents dated 25.2.1970 were under unified command and control of a single person. if the documents had really been acted upon, the centralised command could have actually broken. 99. moreover, one common denominator in the pleadings of both parties, relates to the purpose for which the documents .....

India Pistons Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(113)ELT793(Mad)

..... company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of motor vehicle parts and accessories, falling under chapter no. 84.09 of the central excises and salt act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the central excise act). the petitioner is required to maintain accounts of the goods manufactured by it for the purpose of levy and assessment of excise duty. during the years 1980 ..... no. 5698 of 1986 : 1987(27)elt651(mad) wherein the learned judge has held that the fifth respondent in the said writ petition viz., the under secretary, ministry of finance, cannot hear the revision any more. learned counsel therefore, submitted that by issue of the impugned notice, the petitioner is deprived of valuable ..... the procedure adopted by the appellate tribunal was not correct. it is only in that context, this court held that the 5th respondent viz., the under secretary, ministry of finance should not hear the revision any more. it is well settled that the observation made by the court has to be read in .....

international Air Cargo Workers' Union Vs. International Airport Autho ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2002)IILLJ79Mad

..... certain relevant materials, but by adopting a negative approach had belittled the relevance and importance of several vital and important factual aspects brought on record. 20. in secretary, haryana state electricity board v. suresh reported in :their lordships have observed that the finding of fact arrived at by the labour court cannot otherwise be interfered ..... import and export of cargo and in movement of cargo in the said complex, in co-ordination with the customs authorities. a company by name airfreight ltd., which was registered under the companies act was awarded a contract through which its services were engaged by the authority for loading and unloading of cargo, and other connected work ..... enter the premises of the airport and do porterage service for the air travel passengers was conferred for a period of two years commencing on december 6, 1980. the rights if any of the contract labour are only against their employer viz. the society. if on the other hand the society is to be .....

Dharampal Satyapal Limited Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer,

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2009(243)ELT179(Mad); (2009)24VST193(Mad)

..... masala'. that is why 'pan masala' containing tobacco has all along been specifically described under a different heading, because that is how it is commonly understood.33. in (1980) 46 s.t.c. 256 [delhi cloth & general mills co. ltd. v. state of rajasthan], the supreme court held that in determining the meaning or connotation of ..... the months of october, november and december, 2000, levying tax under entry-ii, part-j of the first schedule to the tamil nadu general sales tax act, 1959 ('tngst act' in short). the petitioners filed a revision before the deputy commissioner (c.t.). the revisional authority confirmed the provisional assessment orders. aggrieved by that, the ..... duty could be imposed on ''pan masala' containing tobacco' under the ade act. the scheme of the ade act is explained in 2000 119 s.t.c. 321 [reliance trading company v. state of kerala] as follows:the central government decided to pass an act to provide for the levy and collection of additional duties of excise on certain .....

Kanyakumari District Planters Association, Nagarcoil rep., by its Secr ...

Court : Chennai

..... supreme court in the case of t.n. godavarman thirumulpad v. union of india,(supra). in the said decision, it was pointed out that the forest conservation act, 1980, was enacted to check further deforestation which ultimately results in ecological imbalance; and therefore, the provisions made therein for the conservation of forests and for matters connected therewith ..... the survey of india is not open to challenge. a division bench of this court in the case of n.mangalchand vaid and ors. vs. the secretary to government of tamil nadu reported in 2008-1-mlj-476, considered identical contentions, which have been raised in these cases and the notification issued under the private ..... of the writ petitions, the larger bench of the hon'ble supreme court by judgment dated 27.07.1999, refused to reconsider the bhavani tea and produce company(supra), and the said decision continuous to hold the field and was binding on the writ court. therefore, the decision rendered in the writ petition was based .....

V.Vasanthakumar Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

..... writ petition was filed under article 32 of the constitution of india, challenging the validity of the national security ordinance, 1980 (11 of 1980) and certain provisions of national security act, 1980 (act 65 of 1980) which replaced the ordinance. the primordial ground of attack was to the power of president/governor to issue an ordinance and ..... tenure expires during may 2014. it is also averred by the petitioner that by virtue of the resolution passed by the ministry of law, justice and company affairs (department of legal affairs) on 22.02.2000, the ".national commission to review the working of the constitution". was constituted under the chairmanship ..... to office: issue order copy on 7.10.2013 jvm to 1.the secretary to government, union of india, parliament house, new delhi-110 001. 2.the secretary to government, ministry of parliamentary affairs, no.92, parliament house, new delhi. 3.the secretary to government, ministry of law and justice, legislative department, dr.rajendra prasad .....

P.Kumar Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

..... of commerce, government arts college, nandanam. this court had the benefit of hearing them also. according to them, as per section 388-e of the act, which was introduced by means of companies (second amendment) act, 2002, the ".tribunal". alone is competent to make a recommendation to the central government for removal of a director.8. i have considered the above ..... of 2013 stands partly allowed. no costs. connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 04.07.2014 index : yes note : issue order copy on 15.07.2014 svki to 1.the secretary to government, education department, fort st.george, chennai -9. 2.the director of school education, college road, chennai - 600 006. 3.the chairman/member ..... ... petitioner in w.p.no.31869/2013 g.g.boopathie ... petitioner in w.p.no.31870/2013 p.arul ... petitioner in w.p.no.31871/2013 vs. 1.the secretary to government, education department, fort st.george, chennai -9. 2.the director of school education, college road, chennai - 600 006. 3.the chairman/member .....