Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: companies second amendment act 2002 section 71 amendment of heading before section 466 Court: gujarat Page 10 of about 153 results (0.100 seconds)

Chhotubhai Babarbhai Patel and ors. Vs. the State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1972Guj153

..... contention before me:-1. the acquisition is bad in law because no opportunity to raise objections was given after ordinance amending the land acquisition act came in force: 2. the agreement as contemplated under chapter 7 with the company, under the amended section 140(1)(aa) has not been made after the ordinance has come in force. 3. the notification under ..... in section 40(1) suffers from constitutional invalidity inasmuch it infringes the provisions of art, 31 (2) and art 19 (1) (f). 2 . that the second respondent company is not a company which is engaged or is taking steps for engaging itself in any industry or work which is for a public purpose, and 3. that the building or the ..... points were taken whatsoever. if the appellants deliberately chose not to take specific pleas in the light of the amendment of the act, it would not be proper for me to permit them to amend the plaint in a second appeal. it was urged by the learned counsel for the appellants that the said plea was in fact taken .....

Mohansinh Vhikhamsinh Vs. Continental Textile Mills

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1997)2GLR1534; (1998)IIILLJ24Guj

..... 2) also could be straightway invoked. there is no dispute that the words 'chapter v-b' were added in sub-clause (1) of section 33-c by the amendment act 32 of 1976. the controversy in the present case relates to the period of 1992 onwards. therefore, chapter v-b matters come within the purview of section 33-c(1 ..... 1995 for enhancement of the punishment imposed by the criminal court and there is no dispute that the said revision application is pending before this court. thereafter, the respondent company neither paid any compensation to the workmen nor did it pay any other benefits including wages to the workmen.3. the petitioners, therefore, had filed a joint application ..... fails to give prior notice of 90 days before the intended closure and if the closure takes effect, then obviously such a closure will be deemed to be illegal. secondly, if a closure takes effect even after a permission for closure has been denied, then for such an eventuality also, the closure shall be deemed to be illegal. .....

Radhabehn and ors. Vs. Mulji Kanji Dhord and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1994ACJ404

..... of 1977, 47 of 1978 and 47 of 1982. by none of these amending acts, by some of which even section 96 of the mv act came to be amended, the legislature thought it fit to insert in section 96 of the mv act any provision making the insurance company liable, on part with the judgment-debtor, i.e., the insured of the ..... accidents and shall comply with all statutory obligations.'the words 'and shall comply with all statutory obligations' appearing in the second proviso to this imt 16 make it abundantly clear that the liability of the insurance company to indemnify the insured would be dependent upon the insured complying with all his statutory obligations. if the insured failed ..... obligations and it is not default which gave rise to the liability for penalty. therefore, by virtue of the second proviso contained in imt 16, which is a part of the insurance policy, the insurance company is not liable to indemnify the insured against the insured's liability to pay penalty. we may point out here .....

Radhabehn and ors. Vs. Mulji Kanji Dhrod and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1(1995)ACC403

..... 1977,47 of 1978 and 47 of 1982. by none of these amending acts, by some of which even section 96 of the m.v. act came to be amended, the legislature though it fit to insert in section 96 of m.v. act any provision making the insurance company liable, on part with the judgment-debtor, i.e., the insured ..... accidents and shall comply with all statutory obligations.'the words 'and shall comply with all statutory obligations' appearing in the second proviso to this imt 16 make it abundantly clear that the liability of the insurance company to indemnify the insured would be dependent upon the insured complying with all his statutory obligations. if the insured failed to ..... statutory obligations and it is not default which gave rise to the liability for penalty. therefore, by virtue of the second proviso contained in imt 16, which is a part of the insurance policy, the insurance company is not liable to indemnify the insured against the insured's liability to pay penalty. we may point out here that .....

A.P. Shah and ors. Vs. B.M. Institute of Mental Health, Ahmedabad Thro ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1986)2GLR910

..... of 1957 and it is not necessary for us to trace the history of the insertion of chapter v-a in the central act by amendment act 47 of 1953 and later on of section 25-fff with other provisions...the aforesaid decisions clearly show that a reference in the matter of closure ..... first gone to the tribunal for decision.88. in kalinga tubes ltd. v. their workmen : (1969)illj557sc in the context of the closure applied by the company management as a result of about 150 workers virtually staging a gherao in the administrative office building which was likely to result in deterioration of industrial relations between the ..... there was any understanding between the niamala bakubhai foundation and the institute about the annual contributions to be made by the foundation, and whether it was formerly recorded. secondly, if no such understanding was recorded, what were precisely the circumstances under which, and the reasons for which shri gautam sarabhai stated before the charity commissioner that the .....

Shravankumar Mahadev Dekote and ors. Vs. the Arvind Mills Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1985)2GLR767

..... added to the said sub-section by the bombay act of 1955, the said act ceased to apply to imperial bank of india and any banking company as defined in the banking companies act, 1949 having branches or establishments in more than one state with effect from the application of the said amending act, 1949. by section 2(4), the state government ..... therefore, it cannot be said on that ground that since it is applicable to the textile industry, the discrimination is practised upon. we do not think that the second limb of the contention that section 2(4) invests unguided and unfettered discretionary power in the government so as to be violative of article 14 of the constitution, ..... entered into the settlement in the matter of bonus for the said year. the petitioners, therefore, have moved this court for challenging the impugned order.3. from the second group of the last two special civil applications, we set out the facts from special civil application no. 1424 of 1979. respondent no. 1 is a textile .....

Prathmesh Farms Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2000)3GLR392

..... but continued to be tenants at will liable to be deprived of their tenancy at the will of their landlords. the working of the bombay tenancy act, 1939, as amended in 1946 throughout the province disclosed certain difficulties in the administration due to the variety of tenures, customs and usages prevailing in the different parts of the ..... , in the same judgment, in the later part of it, the court has observed that on the other hand,land held by other juristic persons such as companies or other legal persons are subject to the same restrictions and limitations as other landlords, like individuals or joint families.11. the entire reading of this judgment shows ..... interpret in the manner in which it has been done, at the most it could be given effect to prospectively and it could not have any retrospective effect. the second question is also, therefore, answered accordingly.16. in the result the impugned circular dt.23.11.98 is hereby quashed and consequently notices at annexures 'i', 'j' .....

Kutch Construction Industries and Rehabilitation Federation Vs. State ...

Court : Gujarat

..... , there is not merit in the contention that there is any lack of competence in the state legislature to pass the impugned amendment act of 1984. 8.2. both the above decisions of the first full bench as well as second full bench were referred to larger bench consisting of five judges in the case of shailesh jadavji varia vs. sub-registrar & ..... instrument. 7. manner of service of notice under rule 4. :- any notice or order under these rules shall be served in the following manner, namely:- in the case of any company, society or association of individuals, whether incorporated or not, the notice or order shall be served, (a) on the secretary or any director or other principal officer of the ..... or association of individuals, as the case may be, as its registered office or if there is no registered office, then at the place where the company, society or association of individuals, as the case may be, carries on business. (2) in the case of any firm, the notice or order shall be served,- (a) upon .....

Babubhai Kanjibhai Patel through Poa Holder Vinodkumar Vs. State of Gu ...

Court : Gujarat

..... be made after the expiry of three years from the date of the publication of the notification; or (ii). published after the commencement of the land acquisition (amendment) act, 1984, shall be made after the expiry of one year from the date of the publication of the notification: provided further that no such declaration shall be made ..... unless the compensation to be awarded for such property is to be paid by a company, or wholly or partly out of public revenues or some fund controlled or managed by a local authority. explanation 1. in computing any of the periods referred ..... of the contingencies mentioned in section 31, sub-section (2), and where the collector is so prevented, the provisions of section 31, sub-section (2), (except the second proviso thereto), shall apply as they apply to the payment of compensation under that section. [3-b]. the amount paid or deposited under sub-section (3-a), shall .....

Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1994)116CTR(Guj)82

..... on the same footing as income-tax inasmuch as it is also a tax on the total income computed under the income-tax act after its adjusted under the companies profits (surtax) act, 1964. therefore, surtax is not an expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business and is not an allowable ..... view, the aforesaid decision would hardly advance the contention raised by learned counsel for the assessee in the present case. as contended by the assessee-company, the company had no obligation to purchase deferred annuity policies for the benefit of the managing directors. it is not pointed out by the assessee that for the ..... was effected by the amendment of finance act, 1964, the word 'remuneration' was dropped from the relevant phrase giving an indication that the legislature did not intend to include cash emoluments in any of the words 'benefit, amenity and perquisite'. secondly, by the said amendment of 1964, the legislature also added the words 'whether convertible into money .....