Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: companies second amendment act 2002 section 121 amendment of section 626 Page 12 of about 21,745 results (0.408 seconds)

Dr. Mrs. Mrunalini Devi Puar and Vs. Gaekwad Investment Corporation

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Reported in : (1995)82CompCas899

..... had filed a writ petition in the high court of delhi, inter alia, challenging the constitutional validity of the companies (amendment) act, 1988, transferring certain jurisdiction of the high court to the company law board and the present constitution of the company law board. the writ petition also, inter alia, prayed for a mandamus to direct this board to first decide ..... no. 675 of 1990, filed in baroda challenging the said issue, restraining the first petitioner from exercising any rights in respect of the said 1,500 shares. the second attempt was made when on february 18, 1992, the petitioner's group filed a suit no. 4 of 1992 in jasdan court and obtained an ex parte order ..... the subject-matter is not identical in both the suits, still where because of identical pleas taken in both the suits by the parties, the decision of the second suit depends on the decision in the first suit, justice requires that the later suit should be stayed till disposal of the first. the decision of the delhi .....

Amit Katyal Vs. Meera Ahuja

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... admission of the cirp proceedings except the irp was appointed and the coc was constituted. under section 12a of the ibc which has been inserted by the insolvency and bankruptcy (second amendment) act, 2018 with retrospective effect from 06.06.2018, the adjudicating authority may allow the withdrawal of application admitted under section 7 or section 9 or section 10, on an application ..... the total home buyers of the same project to jointly file an application under section 7 of the ibc for commencement of cirp against the builder company. the insolvency bankruptcy code (second amendment) bill, 2019 that proposed the amendment to section 7 contained a statement of object and reasons, inter alia, stated as follows: 2. a need was felt to give the highest priority .....

Field Vs. Seabury

Court : US Supreme Court

..... california was admitted as a state into the union, the lot was below high water mark. in order to show themselves entitled to the lot in question under the second section of the act cited, the plaintiffs below produced the following documents: 1. a grant by john w. geary, first alcalde of san francisco, to thomas sprague dated january 3, 1850, ..... of the county of san francisco on or before the third day of april, one thousand eight hundred and fifty. second, that the defendants and those under whom they claimed had a good title to the premises under the provisions of the act of march 26, 1851. they also relied upon a possession of the premises for more than five years prior ..... to this cause, are as follows: page 60 u. s. 325 the first section of the act describes the land to be disposed of, and the second section is that "the use and occupation of all the land described in the first section of the act is hereby granted to the city of san francisco for the term of ninety-nine years from .....

Rama Narayan Mali Vs. Additional Collector and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(2)ALLMR426; 2008(2)BomCR598; 2008(3)MhLj300

..... scheme of planned development, under the aforesaid sub-section. that sub-section of the mlrc is enacted in 1966 at which time neither was the constitution forty-second amendment act enacted, nor was the epa enacted. the matter of public health, safety and convenience would take within its sway inter alia the epa enacted under the specific ..... . in those cases the deeming provision has been applied. 50. it must be remembered that in the aforesaid judgment in the case of ganesh ginning & pressing company (supra) no temporary permission was granted to the applicant. the application was merely filed. the applicant was not informed. the applicant came to learn about it ..... day period failing which it would be deemed to be granted must be rejected. the reliance upon the judgment in the case of ganesh ginning and pressing company is misplaced as the facts are completely distinguishable. the notification ousts the claim of the petitioner completely. the non-reliance upon the notification is also seen .....

Shervani Sugar Syndicate Ltd., Allahabad Vs. Municipal Board, Ujhani

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1982All402

..... right to levy toll in vehicles and other conveyances has undergone a change as a result of the amendment introduced by the u. p. urban local self-government laws (second amendment) act, 1979 -- amending clause (vii) of section 128 (1) of the act. now, clause (vii) reads as follows :--'(vii) a toll on vehicles and other conveyances, ..... the toll unless there was consideration and in any case the consideration was to be found in the general conveniences, advantages and amenities which the company enjoyed on account of having its factory within the municipal limits.8. this reasoning was followed by a learned single judge in punjab lime and lime ..... court in hindustan vanaspati . v. municipal board, ghaziabad : air1962all25 . the imposition of toll tax by the ghaziabad municipal board was challenged by the petitioner company which had a factory at ghaziabad for manufacturing vanaspati at ghaziabad. the factory premises were connected with the main railway line bv a branch line which terminated .....

Yogendra Verma Vs. Dharmendra and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(2)MPHT39; 2005(1)MPLJ118

..... has been made applicable in the state of madhya pradesh with effect from 15-10-1990, the date seems to be incorrectly mentioned in the said judgment. the m.p. amendment act no. 22 of 1990 was inserted on 18-10-1990 and not on 15-10-1990. however, it is observed by the learned judge that the explanation added clarified that ..... the aforesaid circumstances, direction to pay the stamp duty is unsustainable. it was also submitted by shri naik that the agreement was executed on 9-6-2000 and the amendment in the act was introduced with effect from 12-8-2002 which does not have retrospective effect. in sum and substance, the argument of shri naik is that as no possession is ..... the act enforced with effect from 13-8-2002 is only with regard to memorandum of agreement referred to in article 5 of schedule i-a and does not pertains to the present document. it was argued by him that the original article 1 was introduced in the year 1990 with effect from 18-10-1990, and therefore, the second submission of .....

Dr. R.R. Patil and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2002Kant211; ILR2002KAR300; 2003(4)KarLJ331

..... in institutions for higher education or research and scientific and technical institutions.'this entry has remained unchanged since the inception of the constitution.20. before the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976, will came into force with effect from 3-1-1977, entry 11 in list ii i.e. the state list, was follow.'11. education including ..... institutions' has always remained the special preserve of parliament. this was so even before the forty-second amendment, since entry 11 of list ii even then was subject, among others, to entry 66 of list i. after the said amendment, the constitutional position on that score has not undergone any charge. all that has happened is ..... noticed overlapping of legislative fields covered by entries 66 of list-i and entry 11 of list ii [as it existed prior to its deletion by 42nd constitution amendment) laid down following principles for its resolution. (para 23) :--(i) item 11 of list ii and item 66 of list,-i must be harmoniously construed. .....

M. Kesavulu and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD522

..... order was made pursuant to the power given to the president under article 371-d, which is a special provision made under the constitution (thirty second amendment) act, 1973 peculiar to the state of andhra pradesh due to historical background. therefore, the state government have no inherent power in creating a zone ..... order were to create equitable opportunities and facilities for people belonging to different parts of the state of andhra pradesh. therefore, the constitution (thirty-second amendment) act, 1973 through section 3 thereof brought into the constitution article 371-d with effect from july 1, 1974. this is a special provision in ..... features of panchayat raj institutions to impart certainty, continuity and strength to them. therefore, a new part was added by way of constitution 73 amendment act providing inter alia devolution by state legislature all powers and responsibilities upon the panchayats subsisting for preparation of plans for economic development and social justice .....

Gurman Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1984CriLJ718

..... against the railways for compensation of the loss was preferred by the supply depot asc panagarh in accordance with the provisions of section 78b of the indian railways (amendment) act of 1961 which was registered by the railways and the same was under progress with the railway authorities. it has been stated that the general officer commanding, ..... by the prosecution as required under the army rules. it has, therefore, been submitted that the decision and or opinion of the court of enquiry in its second assembly is wholly illegal and unwarranted being in utter violation of the mandatory procedure prescribed by rule 180 of the army rules. it has been further submitted ..... these short certificates a claim against the railways for compensation of the loss was prepared and the same was sent under registered cover before the railway authorities on 2nd ma y, 1981. the court martial was convened on 10th january, 1983 without waiting for the decision of the railway authorities on the claim filed. it .....

Empire Coal and Transp. Co. Vs. Empire Coal and Min. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the state of kentucky. the principal question in the case is whether the empire coal and mining company is a party defendant to the second amended bill. the original bill, filed april 6, 1886, named as defendants "the empire coal and mining company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of kentucky, and whose principal office is in ..... did business and had an agent, provided always it was not a citizen of the same state with the plaintiff. under the act of march 3, 1887, c. 373, 1, in force when the second amended bill was filed, providing that "where the jurisdiction is founded only on the fact that the action is between citizens of different ..... if the defendant had a place of business in the latter. the second amended bill was therefore rightfully dismissed for want of jurisdiction, even if it should be treated as controlled by the act of 1875, and it is unnecessary to consider whether that act or the act of 1887 defines the jurisdiction over this bill, filed after the passage .....