Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: companies act 2013 section 128 books of account etc to be kept by company Page 5 of about 1,264 results (0.211 seconds)

Madhava Naik and ors. Vs. Popular Bank Ltd., Alleppey

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1961Ker14; [1960]30CompCas501(Ker); 1961CriLJ75

..... reports disclose sufficient grounds to justify the passing of an order for the public examination of counter-petitioners 1 to 8 and 12 under section 478 of the companies act and section 45g of the banking companies act. we are not expressing any opinion on that question.7. in the result all these appeals are allowed and the impugned order is ..... and 12, the court passed an order on 19-10-1959 directing that counter-petitioners 1 to 8 and 12 will be publicly examined under section 478 of the companies act and section 45g of the banking companies act. the sustainability of this order has been diallenged in the present appeals. a. s. 1016/1959 is by the 7th counter-petitioner in ..... order passed by the court on 13-6-1958, it was directed that this petition will be treated as a report under section 455(2) of the companies act and section 45-g of the banking companies act, the petition with all the reliefs claimed therein has been maintained intact and has been kept on the file of the court. .....

Ashapura Minechem Ltd. Vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... are under implementation; and, whereas the companies act, 1956 has been repealed are re-enacted as the companies act, 2013 (18 of 2013) which, inter alia, provides for scheme of revival and rehabilitation, sanction of scheme, scheme to be binding and for the implementation of scheme under section 261 to 264 of the companies act, 2013; and, whereas, sections 253 to 269 of the companies act, 2013 have been omitted by eleventh schedule to ..... the insolvency and bankruptcy code, 2016; and, whereas, clause (b) of section 4 of the sick industrial companies (special provisions) repeal act, 2003 has been substituted by the eighth schedule to the code .....

P.A. Tendolkar Vs. Official Liquidator and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1967]37CompCas511(Kar)

..... ). the wording of sub-section(i) of section 235 of the indian companies act, 1913, is practically the same as that of section 165 of the english companies act, 1862, of section 215 of the english companies (consolidation) act,1908, of section 276 of the english companies act, 1929, and of section 333 of the english companies act,1948. the scope of section 333 of the english companies act, 1948, as stated in buckley's companies acts (13 th edition, at ..... banking companies act, the words and figures, 'section 543 of the companies act, 1956' were substituted for 'section 235 of the indian companies act,1913,' by the banking companies (amendment) act,1956, as the companies act, 1956, superseded the indian companies act,1913. 71. in the non obstinate clause at the beginning of sub-section (2) of section 45-o, reference to section 543 of the companies act, 1956, and the earlier reference to section 235 of the indian companies act,1913 .....

M/S Bihar Ruffia Industries Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board

Court : Jharkhand

..... p.s. kulti, district burdwan west bengal ( connection no. gr-535 having connected load of 400 kva) 14.m/s maithan coal company pvt. ltd a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 having its factory at tetulia p.o. and p.s. nirsha, district dhanbad through one of its directors sri shiv kumar sharma ..... electric supply circle, dhanbad ... .... ... ... ... ... respondents with c.w.j.c. no. 3652 of 2000 (r) m/s bihar ruffia industries a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 having its factory at vth phase, adityapur, industrial area gamharia through one of its director, sri suresh agarwal, son of late r.d. agarwal resident of ..... board, electric supply circle, jamshedpur ... ... ... .... respondents with c.w.j.c. no. 3682 of 2000 (r) m/s. jamshedpur well pack industries a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956, having its factory at adityapur industrial area, gamharia through one of its director, sri naresh agarwal, son of late r.d. agarwal, resident of mango, .....

M/S Jamshedpur Well Pack Poly Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board

Court : Jharkhand

..... p.s. kulti, district burdwan west bengal ( connection no. gr-535 having connected load of 400 kva) 14.m/s maithan coal company pvt. ltd a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 having its factory at tetulia p.o. and p.s. nirsha, district dhanbad through one of its directors sri shiv kumar sharma ..... electric supply circle, dhanbad ... .... ... ... ... ... respondents with c.w.j.c. no. 3652 of 2000 (r) m/s bihar ruffia industries a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 having its factory at vth phase, adityapur, industrial area gamharia through one of its director, sri suresh agarwal, son of late r.d. agarwal resident of ..... board, electric supply circle, jamshedpur ... ... ... .... respondents with c.w.j.c. no. 3682 of 2000 (r) m/s. jamshedpur well pack industries a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956, having its factory at adityapur industrial area, gamharia through one of its director, sri naresh agarwal, son of late r.d. agarwal, resident of mango, .....

M/S Tis Fab Limited Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board

Court : Jharkhand

..... p.s. kulti, district burdwan west bengal ( connection no. gr-535 having connected load of 400 kva) 14.m/s maithan coal company pvt. ltd a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 having its factory at tetulia p.o. and p.s. nirsha, district dhanbad through one of its directors sri shiv kumar sharma ..... electric supply circle, dhanbad ... .... ... ... ... ... respondents with c.w.j.c. no. 3652 of 2000 (r) m/s bihar ruffia industries a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 having its factory at vth phase, adityapur, industrial area gamharia through one of its director, sri suresh agarwal, son of late r.d. agarwal resident of ..... board, electric supply circle, jamshedpur ... ... ... .... respondents with c.w.j.c. no. 3682 of 2000 (r) m/s. jamshedpur well pack industries a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956, having its factory at adityapur industrial area, gamharia through one of its director, sri naresh agarwal, son of late r.d. agarwal, resident of mango, .....

All India Anglo Indian Association Vs. R.A. Massey

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1956P& H210

..... language of sections 137 and 141, indian companies act, which sections, however, deal with an entirely different matter. in air 1948 cal 42 (e) it was made quite clear that there was no regulation made in bengal ..... that the proceedings pending in the court ol the learned magistrate be quashed.khosla, j.a criminal complaint by the respondent massey was filed under sections 31, 31a and 36, indian companies act against the all india anglo-indian association, its president frank anthony and its secretary g. w. russel. a preliminary objection to this complaint was ..... as bhagirath chandra v. emperor, air 1948 cal 42 (e). neither decision is, however, of any assistance, because it appears that in bengal no regulation under section 248, indian companies act, has been framed, in connection with such a matter.in ilr (1940) 1 cal 575 :- (air 1940 cal 232) (d) the argument rested on the .....

Modern Woollens Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1993)47ITD154(Mum.)

..... in value of fixed assets.12. our attention was thereafter invited to schedule xiv of the companies act, inserted by the companies (amendment) act, 1988 with retrospective effect from 2-4-1987. it was narrated in the heading itself "see sections 205 and 350". it was submitted that it was clear from the narration that the rates ..... clause (b) of the first proviso to sub-section (1) of section 205 of the companies act are applicable. there is no dispute to the fact that schedule xiv of the companies act, 1956 provides for rates of depreciation in the context of provisions of sections 205 and 350 of the companies act, 1956. it is therefore, apparent that the rates ..... depreciation at the higher rate under the income-tax rules solely with the intention of avoiding the implications of section 115j of the income-tax act. he, therefore, recast the book profits after taking depreciation as per companies act arrived at the above mentioned figure.8. it was submitted before the cit (a) that the assessing .....

Mausumi Bhattacharjee Vs. Anghaila Housing Pvt. Ltd., Sh.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Reported in : (2004)54SCL585

..... are no averments regarding maintainability of the petition by him.10. respondent no. 5 ms kusum lata submitted that the petition filed by the petitioner under section 397 & 398 of the companies act, 1956 is utterly misconceived and bad in law and fails to make any case. the petitioner is not entitled to any of the reliefs claimed in ..... of fulfilling the vacancy of sh. sudhir gupta and appointment of sh. apurba sharma in his place. the petitioner is not entitled to any relief under section 397/398 of the companies act, 1956 on facts or in law and the petition is liable to be dismissed with special cost.9. regarding respondent no. 4, the petitioner had ..... has resigned and the dispute relating to the genuineness of resignation of ms. bhattacharjee is sub-judice in the company petition before the company law board. the said company petition is not maintainable in view of section 397 and 398 of companies act. he relied on the judgment of hon'ble supreme court reported in (2001) 4 scc pg 420 in .....

M/S. Integrated Broadcasting Company Pvt Vs. M/S Nettlinx Ltd, Hyderab ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... serious consequence and, therefore, the jurisdiction has been conferred on the high courts. the order of winding-up can be passed on any of the grounds mentioned in section 433 of the companies act. it does not appear to be the intention of the legislature that such a power can be conferred on an arbitrator. the petition for winding-up cannot be ..... therein, had failed and/or neglected to repay the same within three weeks thereafter or to secure or compound for it to the reasonable satisfaction of the creditor; section 433 of the companies act did not state that the debt must be precisely a definite sum; and if, on the date of filing of the petition, dues in respect of at least ..... a part of the debt which was more than the amount specified in section 434 (1) (a) of the companies act was not denied, the petitioner should be admitted as it was not a requirement of the law that the entire debt must be definite and certain. the .....