Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: companies act 1956 section 221 duty of officer to make disclosure of payments etc Page 8 of about 216 results (0.255 seconds)

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Sri K Ravi Nedungadi Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... failure to show a true and fair view of profit and loss account and balance sheet and non-compliance/non-disclosure liable to be prosecuted u/s628read with section 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 and u/s. ..... the serious fraud investigation officer (sfio) filed a complaint under section 439 read with section 212 of the act, 2013, and under section 621 read with sections 235 and 624 of the act, 1956, along with section 193 of the criminal procedure ..... 6.2 section 628 r/w 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956: accused no.5, 6 and 8 failed to show "related party transactions" in the audited financials of accused no.2 during the period 2008-2012, in respect of payments made to fifotl, a related entity of accused no.2 ..... the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for that offence ..... constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of the proviso to section 200 of cr.pc, the magistrate, while taking cognizance, did not record the statement of such public servant who has filed the complaint in discharge of his official duty.51. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Ambit Private Limited Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... failure to show a true and fair view of profit and loss account and balance sheet and non-compliance/non-disclosure liable to be prosecuted u/s628read with section 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 and u/s. ..... the serious fraud investigation officer (sfio) filed a complaint under section 439 read with section 212 of the act, 2013, and under section 621 read with sections 235 and 624 of the act, 1956, along with section 193 of the criminal procedure ..... 6.2 section 628 r/w 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956: accused no.5, 6 and 8 failed to show "related party transactions" in the audited financials of accused no.2 during the period 2008-2012, in respect of payments made to fifotl, a related entity of accused no.2 ..... the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for that offence ..... constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of the proviso to section 200 of cr.pc, the magistrate, while taking cognizance, did not record the statement of such public servant who has filed the complaint in discharge of his official duty.51. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Mr. Rajesh C Jain Vs. Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... failure to show a true and fair view of profit and loss account and balance sheet and non-compliance/non-disclosure liable to be prosecuted u/s628read with section 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 and u/s. ..... the serious fraud investigation officer (sfio) filed a complaint under section 439 read with section 212 of the act, 2013, and under section 621 read with sections 235 and 624 of the act, 1956, along with section 193 of the criminal procedure ..... 6.2 section 628 r/w 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956: accused no.5, 6 and 8 failed to show "related party transactions" in the audited financials of accused no.2 during the period 2008-2012, in respect of payments made to fifotl, a related entity of accused no.2 ..... the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for that offence ..... constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of the proviso to section 200 of cr.pc, the magistrate, while taking cognizance, did not record the statement of such public servant who has filed the complaint in discharge of his official duty.51. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2023 (HC)

Hubballi Uraban Development Authority Vs. Hubballi Dharwad Municipal C ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... harsham logistics private limited a company incorporated under the provision of the companies act, having its registered office at38 ii floor, eureka ..... of admissions, on the part of the respondent authorities that the private road measuring 414 sq m was private property never acquired by pune municipal corporation or the state government, the respondents had a public duty under section 91 to appropriately modify the scheme and to show the private road as property of its legitimate owners, as per the property records in existence, and or in the award of the arbitrator. ..... thus in each case, courts will have to examine the scheme of the impugned act, its object, purpose as also the question whether payment of nil compensation or nominal compensation would make the impugned law unjust, unfair or unreasonable in terms of other provisions of the constitution ..... the constitution (seventh amendment) act, 1956 deleted list i entry 33, list ii entry 36 and reworded list iii entry 42 relating to acquisition ..... 100266 of 2022 and connected matters kuda act cannot be made applicable to any portion of the layout abutting the subject highway which have been earmarked/demarcated for road widening in future, either under the sanctioned/approved layout plan or under the prevailing master plan and section 32(5) would apply only to those portions shown as roads(internal roads), culverts, parks etc. ..... not deprived of its jurisdiction to entertain a petition under article 226 merely because in - 221 - nc:2023. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Srividya C G Vs. Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... failure to show a true and fair view of profit and loss account and balance sheet and non-compliance/non-disclosure liable to be prosecuted u/s628read with section 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 and u/s. ..... the serious fraud investigation officer (sfio) filed a complaint under section 439 read with section 212 of the act, 2013, and under section 621 read with sections 235 and 624 of the act, 1956, along with section 193 of the criminal procedure ..... 6.2 section 628 r/w 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956: accused no.5, 6 and 8 failed to show "related party transactions" in the audited financials of accused no.2 during the period 2008-2012, in respect of payments made to fifotl, a related entity of accused no.2 ..... the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for that offence ..... constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of the proviso to section 200 of cr.pc, the magistrate, while taking cognizance, did not record the statement of such public servant who has filed the complaint in discharge of his official duty.51. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Rishabh Mishra Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... failure to show a true and fair view of profit and loss account and balance sheet and non-compliance/non-disclosure liable to be prosecuted u/s628read with section 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 and u/s. ..... the serious fraud investigation officer (sfio) filed a complaint under section 439 read with section 212 of the act, 2013, and under section 621 read with sections 235 and 624 of the act, 1956, along with section 193 of the criminal procedure ..... 6.2 section 628 r/w 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956: accused no.5, 6 and 8 failed to show "related party transactions" in the audited financials of accused no.2 during the period 2008-2012, in respect of payments made to fifotl, a related entity of accused no.2 ..... the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for that offence ..... constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of the proviso to section 200 of cr.pc, the magistrate, while taking cognizance, did not record the statement of such public servant who has filed the complaint in discharge of his official duty.51. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Vinod Wadhawani Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... failure to show a true and fair view of profit and loss account and balance sheet and non-compliance/non-disclosure liable to be prosecuted u/s628read with section 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 and u/s. ..... the serious fraud investigation officer (sfio) filed a complaint under section 439 read with section 212 of the act, 2013, and under section 621 read with sections 235 and 624 of the act, 1956, along with section 193 of the criminal procedure ..... 6.2 section 628 r/w 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956: accused no.5, 6 and 8 failed to show "related party transactions" in the audited financials of accused no.2 during the period 2008-2012, in respect of payments made to fifotl, a related entity of accused no.2 ..... the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for that offence ..... constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of the proviso to section 200 of cr.pc, the magistrate, while taking cognizance, did not record the statement of such public servant who has filed the complaint in discharge of his official duty.51. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Sri Ashok Wadhwa Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... failure to show a true and fair view of profit and loss account and balance sheet and non-compliance/non-disclosure liable to be prosecuted u/s628read with section 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 and u/s. ..... the serious fraud investigation officer (sfio) filed a complaint under section 439 read with section 212 of the act, 2013, and under section 621 read with sections 235 and 624 of the act, 1956, along with section 193 of the criminal procedure ..... 6.2 section 628 r/w 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956: accused no.5, 6 and 8 failed to show "related party transactions" in the audited financials of accused no.2 during the period 2008-2012, in respect of payments made to fifotl, a related entity of accused no.2 ..... the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for that offence ..... constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of the proviso to section 200 of cr.pc, the magistrate, while taking cognizance, did not record the statement of such public servant who has filed the complaint in discharge of his official duty.51. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Mr Sujal Shah Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... failure to show a true and fair view of profit and loss account and balance sheet and non-compliance/non-disclosure liable to be prosecuted u/s628read with section 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 and u/s. ..... the serious fraud investigation officer (sfio) filed a complaint under section 439 read with section 212 of the act, 2013, and under section 621 read with sections 235 and 624 of the act, 1956, along with section 193 of the criminal procedure ..... 6.2 section 628 r/w 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956: accused no.5, 6 and 8 failed to show "related party transactions" in the audited financials of accused no.2 during the period 2008-2012, in respect of payments made to fifotl, a related entity of accused no.2 ..... the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for that offence ..... constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of the proviso to section 200 of cr.pc, the magistrate, while taking cognizance, did not record the statement of such public servant who has filed the complaint in discharge of his official duty.51. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Captain G R Gopinath Vs. Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... failure to show a true and fair view of profit and loss account and balance sheet and non-compliance/non-disclosure liable to be prosecuted u/s628read with section 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 and u/s. ..... the serious fraud investigation officer (sfio) filed a complaint under section 439 read with section 212 of the act, 2013, and under section 621 read with sections 235 and 624 of the act, 1956, along with section 193 of the criminal procedure ..... 6.2 section 628 r/w 211 and 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956: accused no.5, 6 and 8 failed to show "related party transactions" in the audited financials of accused no.2 during the period 2008-2012, in respect of payments made to fifotl, a related entity of accused no.2 ..... the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for that offence ..... constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to quashing the impugned order dated2812.2017 passed by the learned lix additional city civil and sessions judge and special court under the companies act, 2013 in the complaint bearing special cc no.12 of2018at annexure-a and all further proceedings and etc.-. ..... of the proviso to section 200 of cr.pc, the magistrate, while taking cognizance, did not record the statement of such public servant who has filed the complaint in discharge of his official duty.51. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //