Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1999MP41; 1999(1)MPLJ522
ORDERD.P.S. Chauhan, J.1. By means of this petition, petitioner Kailash Joshi has approached this Court seeking the relief for quashing the Order dated 8-5-1997, Annexure-P/1 to the petition and for a direction to the Commission of Inquiry into the affairs of Churhat Children Welfare Society (for brevity, hereinafter referred to as the Corn-mission) for summoning Shri Arum Singh for his cross-examination.2. The order dated 8-5-1997 is the order passed by the Chairman of the Commission rejecting the application of the petitioner for cross-examination, operative portion of which is as extracted below :'In the result, I find that Shri Kailash Joshi has not made out a case for summoning Shri Arjun Singh to come to the witness-box to give evidence and submit himself for cross-examination.'3. It is necessary to give brief facts before considering the arguments as advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner Shri Rakesh Jain as well as learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 State Shri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1999MP122
ORDERD.M. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Professor Narendra Kumar Gouraha was appointed as Vice-Chancellor of Pt. Ravishanker Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the University' for short). The University is constituted under the provisions of M. P. Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner assails three notifications issued on 23rd February, 1997 (Annexures P/1, P/2 and P/3) whereby the State Government by invoking its extraordinary power of emergency under Section 52 of the Act has completely taken over the management and powers of the University and appointed Professor H. R. Singh, respondent No. 4, as Vice-Chancellor of the University. The appointment of another Vice-Chancellor to the University has been made as a consequence ensuing from exercise of power under Section 52(4) of the Act whereby the existing Vice-Chancellor has to vacate his office.3. The ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
G.D. Saxena, J. (1) This revision petition under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 preferred by the petitioner/accused is directed against an order dated 13th July 2011 in Special Sessions Case No. 111/2009 by the Special Judge (Atrocities), Bhind, rejecting thereby prayer of the accused that he is a Juvenile and below 18 years of age, at the time of commission of offence. (2) Brief facts, just for the decision of this case are that the petitioner was shown as accused in case Crime No. 30/2009 registered by the Police Station Endori, district Bhind. The investigation was conducted by the CBI and after investigation, the charge-sheet was filed before the criminal court. After committal, the trial commenced before the Special Judge Bhind. As per the Investigating Agency, the age of the accused/petitioner was above 18 years and therefore he was arrested and committed in the Judicial custody. The petitioner by filling an application contended that at the time of incide...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : (2001)IIILLJ1254MP; 2001(2)MPHT3
ORDERS.K. Kulshrestha, J.1. The petitioner-employer has filed W.P. No. 3007 of 1999 against the order dated 14-5-1999 (Annexure P-II) passed by the Industrial Court, Raipur in Appeal No. 120/MPIR/98 by which the Industrial Court has directed reinstatement of second respondent-Niranjan Lal Yadav in service. Therespondent No. 2 has filed petition W.P. No. 4984 of 1999 challenging the very order in so far as the Industrial Court has declined to award back wages.2. The second respondent (employee) had filed an application before the Labour Court, Raipur under the provisions of Section 31 (3) of the M.P. Industrial Relations Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') challenging termination of his service by the petitioner. According to the case set up by the said respondent, he had been appointed as an Electrician on 27-7-1987 and while he was rendering service on the said post, he was served with a charge-sheet dated 7-5-1991 alleging that he, on 3-5-1991 at about 6.30 p.m., along with hi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No :5823. OF 200.(s) Raj Bahadur Khare V/s Madhya Bharat Gramin Bank Pradhan Karyalaya, Sagar & Ors. Present : Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri R.K. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ashish Shroti, learned counsel for respondents/Bank. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER 26.9.2012 Challenging the orders passed by respondent bank removing the petitioner from service vide order Annexure P-1 dated 8.12.2005 and dismissing his appeal vide order dated 4.4.2006 Annexure P-3, petitioner has filed this writ petition.2. Petitioner Shri Raj Bahadur Khare at the relevant time when the impugned action took place was working as a Junior Management Grade-I in the respondent bank and was posted in Chandla Branch. He was appointed on 14.6.1978 and after earning various p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. Writ Petition No.15605/2010 Christ Jyoti Senior Secondary School & another. Vs State of M.P.and otheRs.PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi.J.Shri Brian D. Silva, learned Senior counsel assisted by Shri Arjun Singh, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Ved Prakash Tiwari, learned Panel Lawyer, for respondents. ORDER (14.2.2013) By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have called in question the order dated 11.10.2010, passed by the respondent No.2, by which certain queries have been made and information is sought from the petitioneRs.It is contended that such an order has been issued in complete violation of the law asking the petitioners to furnish such information which is not relevant for the purposes of implementing any Scheme of the State Government made for the benefit or to facilitate the Backward Class community students. It is contended that such an action of the respondents is nothing b...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh Gwalior
(1) This revision petition under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2000, read with Sections 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, has been preferred against an order dated 16 th March 2011 in Criminal Case No. 25/2011 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge Guna, holding after conducting an inquiry that the petitioners are not juveniles. (2) The facts necessary for the disposal of this petition are that on 6 th December 2011 at Town of Raghogarh, District Guna, one Deepak Soni, s/o Babulal Soni was reported to be missing from his house. Said report was recorded in Rojnamcha of the police Station. During search on 8/12/10, the dead body of Deepak Soni in a gunny beg was found under beneath of culvert of ITI at Raghogarh. Accordingly, Marg report was registered. During inquiry, it appeared that the accused including petitioners committed murder of missing Deepak Soni and caused the evidence of offence to be disappeared with an intent...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh Gwalior
(1) This revision petition under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 is directed against an order dated 13 th May 2011 in Criminal Revision No. 21/2011 passed by the Fourth Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Guna, M.P. allowing thereby the revision filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh while setting aside the order passed in Criminal Case No.217/10 dated 23/11/10 of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Guna and remanding the case to that court for redetermine the age of the accused after following the procedure laid down in Rule 12(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2007. (2) The facts necessary for the disposal of this petition are that a Crime No.217/10 was registered against the accused-petitioner Govind for commission of offence punishable under Sections 302, 452, 147, 148, 149, 323, 324 and 325 of I.P.C. by police station Dharnabda for causing death of one Hukum Singh and injuring persons namely, Geetabai, Ramjane, Bana Sahab Madurn on 22 n...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : AIR2000MP149; 2000(2)MPHT359; 2000(1)MPLJ192
ORDERC.K. Prasad, J. 1. Petitioner was the Vice-Chan-cellor of respondent No. 3 i.e. Pandit Ravi Shankar Shukla University (hereinafter referred to as the 'University' State Government came to the conclusion that the administration of the University cannot be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Universities Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') without detriment to its interest, it exercised the powers conferred under Section 52(1) of the Act and issued notification dated 8-1-1999 directing that the provisions of Sections 13, 14, 20 to 25, 40, 47, 48, 54 and 67 shall apply to the University; subject to the modification specified in the Third Schedule of the Act. After the issuance of the aforesaid notification, the Chancellor of the University in exercise of the power conferred under modified Sections 13 and 14 read with Section 52(3} of the Act and in consultation with the State Govt. by notification dated 8-1-1999, appointed Sri V. K. Dalela...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
G.D. SAXENA, J. (1) This revision petition under Sections 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, has been preferred against an order dated 29th September, 2011 in Sessions Case No.61/08 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Sironj, dismissing thereby the application of the petitioners-accused for holding them as juveniles. (2) The case of the petitioners are that during trial, the petitioners filed the application stating that on the date of incident, i.e., 8th October, 2007, they were below 18 years of age, hence they being juveniles it was requested that their case be referred to the Juvenile Justice Court for holding an inquiry with regard to determination of their age and trial before the board. The trial Court on the basis of the evidence of the petitioners filed with the application and the evidence collected during investigation, concluded that the petitioners were not juveniles, hence, this revision. (3) The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the lear...
Tag this Judgment!