Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 31 offences by companies Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 13 results (0.098 seconds)

Maruti Udyog Ltd. Vs. Ram Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ1121P& H; (1995)111PLR575

..... of the supreme court holding that the employees are not a liability, therefore, section 9 was not attracted. it was further held that in terms of section 17 of the coking coals mines nationalisation act, 1972, which is analogous to section 13 of the acquisition act before us the dismissed workmen who had been reinstated by the tribunal would be deemed to be the ..... ltd. the industrial tribunal as per its award dated july 1, 1972 directed reinstatement of the workmen. section 9 of the coking coal mines nationalisation act, 1972 whereby the colliery was nationalised is similar to section 5 of the acquisition act with which we are concerned in the present case. relying on the provisions of section 9, the government company contended that .....

Mohan Lal Raghbir Singh and ors. Vs. Balbir Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1999]96CompCas460(P& H)

..... a public place is a statutory duty cast on the insurance companies. as already observed, the business of general insurance including motor vehicle insurance was nationalised in the year 1972, and the government has taken over the business of general insurance including the motor vehicle insurance. therefore, the insurance companies ..... 30. every policy issued is required to be registered in the records. every insurance company shall maintain the record and under the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972, the central government has got the power to issue directions and the central government also have got the power to control the ..... the government of india has taken over general insurance business including motor vehicle insurance business. therefore, after the coming into force of the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972, all the business of general insurance came under the monopoly of the central government. under section 35 of the said act, the provisions .....

United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Kamla Rani and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1997ACJ1081; (1997)117PLR302

..... a public place is a statutory duty cast on the insurance companies. as already observed, the business of general insurance including motor vehicle insurance was nationalised in the year 1972 and the government has taken over the business of general insurance including the motor vehicle insurance. therefore, the insurance companies ..... 33. every policy issued is required to be registered in the records. every insurance company shall maintain the record and under the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972, the central govt. has got the power to issue directions and the central government also have got the power to control over ..... clear that the government of india has taken over general insurance business including motor vehicle insurance business. therefore, after coming into force of general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972, all the business of general insurance came under the monopoly of the central government. under section 35 of the said act, the provisions .....

Ram Puri, Chandigarh Vs. Chief Commissioner, Chandigarh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1982P& H301

M.M. Punchhi, J.1. In Amrit Sagar Kashyap v. Chief Commr., U. T. Chandigarh, (1980) 82 Pun LR 441, a Division Bench of this Court (the judgment of which was prepared by me and concurred by D. S. Tewatia, J.) had the occasion to interpret S. 8-A of the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 (for short the Act) and in particular the meaning of the words 'resume' and 'resumption' occurring prominently therein. The view thus taken came to be doubted very often necessitating its re-examination by a Full Bench, on these two matters being referred to it, being Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 2830 of 1970 and 1149 of 1979, which await disposal at our end. Amusingly it has again fallen to my share to prepare the judgment, be it a case of reorientation or refurbishing the earlier view or one of substitution or reversal. A fresh look on the subject becomes essential uninhibited of the view taken by the Division Bench.2. A small legislative history would not be out of place. The town o...

Kalwa Vs. Vasakha Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1982P& H480

..... words, the context in which the words occur, the object of the statute in which the provision is included, and the policy underlying the statute, become relevant and material........................'lord coke in a celebrated case; heydon's case (1584) 3 co rep 7b, handed down the following dictum in this regard :'to arrive at the real meaning, it is always necessary .....

M/S. Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. and Others Vs. Haryana S ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... in the table appended in it:- i) location of any new industry including expansion modernization; ii) (a) all new mining operations including renewals of mining leases, (b) existing mining leases in sanctuaries/national parks and areas covered under project tiger and/or (c) mining is being done without permission of the competent authority. (iii)cutting of trees; (iv)construction of any cluster of dwelling .....

Trishul Industries Vs. the State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)144PLR222

..... board, and unless specifically assigned, the agreement normally would have affected the consumer with whom it is made, as was held in northern ontario power co. ltd. v. la roche mines ltd. (1938)3 a11.e.r. 755.in view of the observations, of the supreme court quoted above, we are of the opinion that even if the petitioners had entered .....

Babu Ram Jagdish Kumar and Co. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1976]38STC259(P& H)

Harbans Lal, J.1. This judgment will dispose of Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 354, 416, 418, 432, 462, 463, 473, 474, 495, 496, 497, 501, 504, 517, 519, 524, 555, 556, 557, 564, 571, 576, 579, 582, 586, 614, 623, 644, 648, 669, 693, 694, 734, 736, 805, 855, 864, 870 and 904 of 1975, which have been filed under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of:(1) a writ of mandamus that the paddy being agricultural produce is exempt under Schedule B to the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter to be called the Act), and is, thus, exempt from purchase tax;(2) a writ of mandamus that the notification dated 15th January, 1968, including pacldy in Schedule C to the Act is not in accordance with Section 31 of the Act and that the said notification is not valid;(3) a writ of mandamus declaring Section 31 of the Act as ultra vires and unconstitutional;(4) that the petitioners are not dealers as defined under the Act and, therefore, not liable to pay any purchase tax;...

Dr. M.C. Sharma, Lecturer Vs. the Punjab University, Chandigarh and Ot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1997P& H87

..... and (2) forbid discrimination against any citizen on the ground of sex, the state may discriminate against males by making a special provision in favour of females.' (underlining is mine).52. in girdhar gopal v. state, air 1953 madh bha 147, a learned single judge has held :--'the discrimination that is prohibited under art. 15(1) is a ..... securing our personal freedom is efficient, but our procedure for preventing the power is not. just as the pick and shovel is no longer suitable for the winning of coal, so also the procedure of mandamus, certiorari and actions on the case arc not suitable for the winning of freedom in the new age. they must be replaced ..... of the matter i did not express any opinion regarding validity of regulation 5 in chapter vii(ii) of the punjab university calendar, volume iii. this view of mine on the preliminary objection has not been concurred by the brother judges constituting the full bench who are equally divided in regard to the validity of the regulation in .....

Barjinder Singh, Chief Editor, the Daily Ajit Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2040

..... the invasion of the right. what determines invasion of the right and attracts jurisdiction of the courts is the effect of the law and the action upon the right. bank nationalisation case air 1970 sc 564 quoted in indian express private limited v. union of india, air 1986 sc 782 (sic).) the courts have to guard fundamental rights by considering the .....