Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 18 provident fund Sorted by: recent Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 50 results (0.117 seconds)

Stanley Ward and ors. Vs. Coal India Limited and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(3)MPHT491; 2000(3)MPLJ380

..... enacted the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 (no. 26 of 1973) which came into force with effect from 1-5-1973. by the said enactment the coal mines including the mines of m/s. shaw wallace were nationalised and the management of all the private coal mines vested in the company called coal india limited. ..... thereafter, seven subsidiaries were formed such as western coalfields limited, south eastern coalfields limited, eastern coalfields limited, central coalfields limited, northern coalfields limited, bharat coal coking limited arid central mines ..... effect from 1-5-1973. the amended provision reads as under :'14. liability of officer or other employee of a coal mine for transfer to any other coal mine.-- notwithstanding anything contained in the industrial disputes act, 1947 (14 of 1947), or in any other law for the time .....

Pilani Investment and Industries Corporation Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union o ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1988MP181; 1988MPLJ266

..... process for the good of the community within the meaning of article 39(b). again in sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. bharat coking coal ltd., air 1983 sc239 it has been held that coking coal mines (nationalisation) act is a legislation for giving effect to the policy of the state towards securing the principle specified ..... in article 39(b) of the constitution and is, therefore, immune under article 31c, from attack on the ground that it offends the fundamental right guaranteed by article 14. nationalisation of coal mines ..... unsecured loans of the government and banks.11. the petitioners pointed out that the provisions of coal mines (nationalisation) act, and sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act are not akin to those of the hind cycles (nationalisation) act and differences in the relevant provisions were highlighted. no two acts can be identical and .....

Kulbir Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1989MP279; 1988MPLJ301

..... is a distributive process for the good of the community within the meaning of article 39(b). in sanjeev coke mfg. 'co. v. m/s. bharat coking coal ltd. air 1983 sc 239 it was held that nationalisation of coal mines in whole or in part is a law for implementation of article 39(b). the supreme court in state of tamil ..... base had been eroded many times over and the companies could be restarted with unencumbered assets only after total elimination of the external liabilities through a process of nationalisation. the provisions of the act do not offend article 21 nor they are in contravention of articles 300a or 301. prioity has to be given regarding payment ..... of commerce, bombay. the suit was allowed and the matter was referred to the named arbitrator on 4-5-1979. thereafter hind cycles limited and sen-raleigh limited (nationalisation) ordinance, 1980 was promulgated on 25-10-1980 which was subsequently made act no. 70/1980 -- by notification dt. 28-10-1980 the central government transferred the .....

Coal Mines Authority Ltd., Calcutta and ors. Vs. Associated Cement Com ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1986MP241; 1986MPLJ612

..... whenever a question arises as to whether a particular asset vested in the central government as a consequence of the application of the coal mines (nationalisation) act to that particular mine, what is to be seen is whether it answers the description given in any of the clauses. what is, therefore, to ..... .e., the plaintiff. the dispute, however, is as to what actually so vested. 'mine' and 'coal mine' have been assigned special significance under the coal mines (nationalisation) act. 'mine' is defined under section 2(h) which reads as follows :'(h) 'mine' means any excavation where any operation for the purpose of searching for or obtaining minerals has ..... nationalisation act. likewise, clause (x) is also not attracted. in terms of that clause, only such lands, buildings and equipments belonging to the owners of the mine which are in, adjacent to or situated on the surface of the mine where the washing of coal obtained from the mine or manufacture, therefrom, of coke is carried on 'are mines .....

Upendra Kumar Kaliya Vs. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Review Petition No.986/2012 01.03.2013 Mr. Satish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.B. Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard on I.A. No.14613/2012, an application for condonation of delay. For the reasons assigned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I find that sufficient reason has been shown for condoning the delay in filing the review petition is made out. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. I.A. No.14613/2012 is allowed. Heard. This petition has been filed for review of the judgment dated 09.10.2012 passed by this Court in Second Appeal No.287/1996. This Court vide judgment dated 09.10.2012 had dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner on the ground that the plea with regard to validity of quit notice was neither raised before the Trial Court not before the Lower Appellate Court. Since the plea of validity of quit notice is mixed question of law and fact, it cannot be allowed to be raised for the first time in app...

Rameshwar NekhrA. Vs. the State Bar Council of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

1. The first mentioned of these two connected writ petitions being W.P. No. 6628/2011 has been filed by the present Chairman of the Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh. The second connected petition being Writ Petition No. 6372/2011 has been filed by a Member of the said Bar Council. Both the petitions have been filed for the same relief2 on virtually the same grounds. They have been heard together and are consequently being disposed of by this common order. Two broad questions have been raised (A) whether the Rule 122-A framed under section 15 of the Advocates Act, 1961 is ultra-vires, and (B) whether the second resolution (Annexure R/6 to the Bar Council’s return) dated 16-04-2011 in the meeting of the Bar Council is invalid. The relevant facts are given below.  2. Shri Rameshwar Neekhra was elected as a Member of the Madhya Pradesh State Bar Council in 2008. Shri Neekhra was elected as Chairman of the Bar Council by its members on 31.8.2008. 3. For prescribing (i) the manner of...

Smt. Sumarwati Bai. Vs. the Mines Manager.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... accept the monetary compensation of rs.4000/- per month or employment irrespective of her age.(ii) in case of death/total permanent disablement due to causes other than mine accident and medical unfitness under clause 9.4.0, if the female dependant is below the age of 45 years, she will have the option either to accept ..... fallen in error. we have considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant. however, we do not find any merit in the same. the national coal wages agreement (ncwa vth) was introduced to provide employment to the dependents of the employees of the western coalfields ltd.. to appreciate the controversy, let us have a ..... approached this court by filing writ petition no.5233/2010(s), inter alia, claiming compensation for the aforesaid period in terms of clause 9.5.0 of national coal wages agreement v (for short `ncwa- v').6. the learned single judge having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties dismissed the writ petition by the .....

indore Development Authority Vs. Shri Ram Builders and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2009MP169

..... substance, in favour of the land owners.(viii) the doctrine of delay and laches gets attracted in view of the law laid down by the apex court-in pure industrial coke and chemicals ltd. : air 2007 sc 2458 (supra) and the doctrine of subserving larger public interest has no room whatsoever.(ix) the authority can proceed to take appropriate action under ..... delay and laches. a statutory authority is required to act in quite promptitude. at this juncture, we may refer to the decision in chairman, indore vikas pradhikaran v. pure industrial coke and chemicals ltd. and ors. : (2007) 8 scc 705 : air 2007 sc 2458 wherein it has been held as under:46. where, however, a scheme comes into force, although it .....

Addl. Commissioner of Sales Tax and ors. Vs. S. Kumar Limited

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2009)19VST573(MP)

..... follows that non-mention of a commodity in an entry does not by itself exclude the articles which it impliedly incorporates by choosing the all-inclusive definition such as coal including coke in all its forms. the said decision was considered by the supreme court in commissioner of sales tax, madhya pradesh, indore v. jaswant singh charan singh : ..... binod mills [1972] 29 stc 413 (mp), a division bench comprising p. k. tare and g. p. singh, jj, considered whether coal includes coal ash and it was observed that the entry coal including coke in all its form had already been interpreted in the case of samrathmal dhoolchand m. c. c. no. 253 of 1967 decided on ..... its use in that sense has become obsolete. the usual sense in which it is now used connotes a firm, brittle (generally black) carbonaceous rock derived from mines. this will be clear from any standard dictionary. the board has referred to the blackies' concise dictionary. we may mention the chamber's twentieth century dictionary which .....

Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)17VST465(MP)

..... government that so many registered dealers were either misusing form c for the purposes of import or were using bogus form c instead of purchasing petroleum products from the same nationalised companies in the state of m.p. keeping in view the aforesaid, the concept of levy of entry tax was introduced and the notification was issued, this has a wholesome ..... to industrial units, not to any individual and the individual has to buy the petroleum products only from the authorised petrol pump which purchases petroleum products from regional depots of nationalised companies situated within the state of m.p. it is also put forth by him that keeping in view the collective good and to avoid the evasion of tax, the .....