Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 14 management etc of coking coal mines and coke oven plants Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 1 results (0.820 seconds)

G. Krishna Murthy Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Princip ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(4)ALD445; 2008(4)ALT287

..... taking the action, an opinion of the advocate general of the state of bihar was sought by the respondent. referring to the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the advocate general opined that such amount could be claimed by the state government from the appellant company. reference was made to ..... bihar and orissa public demands recovery act, 1914, in view of the provisions of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957, the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and also the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. but it also cannot be overlooked that the action has been taken under ..... as to the jurisdiction of the state government and/or its officers in initiating certificate proceedings against the company. regarding the earlier decision in national coal development corporation ltd. v. state of bihar : air1984pat280 , the high court was right in observing that the contention regarding alternative remedy was neither .....

Sujana Metal Products Limited Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Panjagutta D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (2009)20VST405(AP)

..... makes it clear that before taking the action, an opinion of the advocate-general of the state of bihar was sought by the respondent. referring to the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the advocate-general opined that such amount could be claimed by the state government from the appellant-company. reference was made to sections 6 and 7 of the ..... not have been initiated under the bihar and orissa public demands recovery act, 1914, in view of the provisions of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957, the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and also the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. but it also cannot be overlooked that the action has been taken under the bihar and orissa public demands .....

South Central Railway and ors. Vs. Mutha NavIn Krishna and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD726

..... makes it clear that before taking the action, an opinion of the advocate general of the state of bihar was sought by the respondent. referring to the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the advocate general opined that such amount could be claimed by the state government from the appellant company. reference was made to sections 6 and 7 of the ..... not have been initiated under the bihar and orissa public demands recovery act, 1914, in view of the provisions of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957, the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and also the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. but it also cannot be overlooked that the action has been taken under the bihar and orissa public demands .....

Kanaka Durga Wines and ors. Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1995(3)ALT228

..... amendment of the said provision by the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976, got restored.14. in sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. bharat coking coal ltd. (3 supra), writs were filed in calcutta high court questioning the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 pursuant to which the coal mines and coke oven plants belonging to the petitioner, were nationalized. the cases were withdrawn to the supreme court. the challenge to ..... of article 14. the central government claimed protection of article 31-c of the constitution of india. the question that arose for consideration of the supreme court, was whether the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 was entitled to the protection of article 31-c of the constitution. we may note here that the protection of article 31-c was claimed on the ground .....

V. Devaiah Vs. Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar District

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD408; 2002(1)ALT241

..... person, who has the requisite qualification to be a judge of the high court e.g. income-tax appellate tribunal, railway claims tribunal, l.i.c., tribunal, tribunal under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 tribunal under waste lands (claims) act, drugs act and companies act. in relation to constitution of various tribunals, qualifications of the members or the presiding officer had .....

Eswara Laminates (P) Ltd., Pedda Autpally and ors. Vs. Singareni Colli ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(3)ALD731; 1998(3)ALT785

..... considerations.'the observations at paragraph 15 in m/s. rohtas industries ltd v. chairman, b.s.e.b., : [1984]3scr59 are also relied upon. the provisions of the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 and colliery control order are referred to by some of the learned counsel to say that though the respondent is a company doing ..... the government of india by its notification dated 22-3-1996 issued under clause 3(2) of the colliery control order, deregulated the price and distribution of non-coking coal of grades a, b and c. by a further notification dated 12-3-1997, decontrol was extended to some other grades of ..... ) steel including sponge iron and pig iron and other metallurgical industries who use coal/coke for their own end use. the consumers arc extended inter se priorities in the supply of coal by granting appropriate linkages. no linkage is required for defence, railways and for exports. the coal linkages as far as these industries concerned are monitored periodically by the standing linkage .....

Prakash Vs. Pushpa Vani

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(3)ALD858; 2004(4)ALT286

..... v. bharat coking coal limited, air 1989 sc 1530, two questions were raised before the supreme court in this case are (1) whether the suit lands had vested, free from encumbrance in the state consequent upon the issuance of notification under section 3, of the bihar land reforms act; and (2) whether the suit land is 'mine' within the meaning of the coal mines (nationalisation) act ..... , 1973? the appellant contended that there is no proper pleading for determination whether the suit land is a mine within the meaning of coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. it is appropriate to extract the paragraphs 18 and 19 of the above judgment .....

A. Raja Murali Vs. M/S. Singareni Collieries Company Limite

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... petitioner except the decision reported in b. komaraiah's case (2 supra).learned counsel for the respondent-company has relied on a decision reported in g.m.bharat coking coal limited., west bengal v. shib kumar dushad (6 supra).in that case, the case of the respondent was that he was an employee of a private colliery ..... has no knowledge with regard to mentioning of his age as 25 years at the time of his appointment. according to the petitioner, he passed examinations under coal mine regulations of 1957 and obtained shot firer certificate and sirdar certificate on 07.08.1974 and 03.03.1976 respectively, wherein his date of birth was mentioned by ..... register, which was not communicated to him at any point of time. his further case is that during his service, he passed various examinations under the mines act and under coal mines regulations 1957 and obtained shot firer's certificate, sirdar certificate and overman's certificate and in all the said certificates his date of birth was mentioned .....

Bharat Heavy Plates Vs. Vessels Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1986)ILLJ145AP

..... out between the doctrinaire approach to the problem of socialism and the pragmatic one is very apt and may enable the courts to lean more and more in favour of nationalisation and state ownership of any industry after the addition of the word 'socialist' in the preamble of the constitution.' 19. the above observations by the supreme court in excelwear's .....