Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 10 payment of amount to owners of coking coal mines Page 13 of about 122 results (0.177 seconds)

Eswara Laminates (P) Ltd., Pedda Autpally and ors. Vs. Singareni Colli ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(3)ALD731; 1998(3)ALT785

..... considerations.'the observations at paragraph 15 in m/s. rohtas industries ltd v. chairman, b.s.e.b., : [1984]3scr59 are also relied upon. the provisions of the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 and colliery control order are referred to by some of the learned counsel to say that though the respondent is a company doing ..... the government of india by its notification dated 22-3-1996 issued under clause 3(2) of the colliery control order, deregulated the price and distribution of non-coking coal of grades a, b and c. by a further notification dated 12-3-1997, decontrol was extended to some other grades of ..... ) steel including sponge iron and pig iron and other metallurgical industries who use coal/coke for their own end use. the consumers arc extended inter se priorities in the supply of coal by granting appropriate linkages. no linkage is required for defence, railways and for exports. the coal linkages as far as these industries concerned are monitored periodically by the standing linkage .....

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. Turner Morrison Ltd. and Anr.

Court : Kolkata

..... was owning the suit premises, the said ownership right along with its assets and properties stood transferred to and vested on the plaintiff by virtue of the coal mines (nationalisation) act absolutely and free from all encumbrances. the learned senior counsel submits that the plaint does not have any spine and backbone to stand and an incredible ..... behalf of the applicants, submits that the basis of the plaint is discovery in october, 2012 by the plaintiff that by reason of the provisions of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the property forming the subject matter of the suit has vested in the plaintiff and by reason thereof, the defendant is not the owner ..... calcutta ordinary original civil jurisdiction present : the hon ble justice soumen sen ga no.2797 of 2013 cs no.11 of 2013 bharat coking coal ltd.versus turner morrison ltd.& anr. for bharat coking coal ltd.: mr.mr.mr.mr.for turner morrison ltd.: mr.s.k.kapoor, sr.advocate mr.ranjan bachawat, sr.advocate mr.ratnanko banerjee .....

Akanksha International Through Its Proprietor Mrs. Anju Suryaprakash D ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR611; 2007(5)BomCR481; (2007)109BOMLR1959; 2008(1)MhLj753

..... had executed a sale deed in respect of property (bungalow and lands) owned by company on 20.3.1972. the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 vesting in the central government right, title and interest of owners of coal mines specified in schedule, came into force on 1.5.1973. admittedly the appellant purchasers of property were the wives of the two directors of the company ..... of one of its members. there is no change in the ownership in real sense.27. here we may refer to the case of subhra mukherjee and anr. v. bharat coking coal ltd. and ors. : air2000sc1203 . in that case, their lordships considered the doctrine of lifting of corporate veil. there was allegation of sham and collusive transaction by the company. the high .....

G.V. Films Ltd. Vs. S. Priyadarshan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2006]287ITR561(Mad)

..... arose before the supreme court in the decision 1 reported in subra mukherjee v. bharat coking coal ltd. : air2000sc1203 . in the said case, directors of a private coal mining company executing sale deed in respect of property (bungalow and lands) owned by company on march 20, 1972, and the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, coming into force on may 1, 1973. pointing out that the purchasers of ..... the case of husband and wife, learned senior counsel for the auction purchasers has relied upon the decisions reported in parvinder singh v. renu gautam : air2004sc2299 , subra mukherjee v. bharat coking coal ltd. : air2000sc1203 , madras bangalore transport co. (west) v. inder singh : air1986sc1564 , cit v. sri meenakshi mills ltd. : [1967]63itr609(sc) , juggilal kamlapat v. cit : [1969]73itr702(sc) .112. it is .....

Central Coalfields Ltd. Vs. T.M.S. Engineering and Construction Compan ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(4)JCR437(Jhr)]

..... by virtue of section 3 and the machineries and equipments etc. aforesaid have nexus with the activities of the said coal mines. in support of his contention reliance has also been placed upon the ratios of the case of bharat coking coal limited v. shyam sunder prasad and ors. (1998) 5 scc 512, valley refractories private limited and anr. ..... the definition, in my opinion, the weighbridge would come within the purview of the 'coal mine' and the right. title and interest and the ownership of the weighbridge vestsn the central government by virtue of section 3.' in the case of bharat coking coal limited v. karam chand thapar and bros. private limited and others (supra) is has ..... vest absolutely in, the central government free from all encumbrances.in the case of bharat coking coal limited v. madanlal agrawal (supra). it has been observed by the apex court that alt properties or assets which fall within the definition of 'mine' in section 2(h) and which are used for over a period of time not .....

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. M/S. Auroma Coke Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... the government owing to heavy infrastructural investment required for establishing a washery. this was inevitable as coal mined in india has high content of ash. unless such ash content was reduced in a coal washery, there was no demand for the same. the low ash content of coking coal required by the industries compelled to import same from other countries which affected the foreign exchange ..... limited company having its registered office at calcutta. after nationalization of coal mines in the year 1973, private sector was not allowed to set up coal washeries. coal india ltd.(for short referred to as cil ) is the apex company which decides all policy matters on behalf of the subsidiary coal companies. the appellant bharat coking coal ltd.(for short referred to as bccl ) is one of .....

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.

Court : Patna

..... village budroochak and kumarjuri also comes below that aerial ropeway. an agreement by way of licence has been executed between the then owner of the chaitudih coal mines namely m/s. burrakar coking coal company ltd. and the defendant no. 1 company on 31.5.1959 for erecting trestles, etc. for the purpose of running of the ropeway. the ..... having its registered office at koyla bhavan, dhanbad and carries on the business of extraction of coal from coal mines located in the district of dhanbad. the colliery of katras chaitudih was a private coking coal company and after the coming up of the coal mines nationalization act, the same has been vested in the central government, w.e.f. 1. ..... a railway siding falls within the pathway of ropeway, defendants had to make an agreement with the owner of the mines. m/s. bccl has stepped into the shoes of the erstwhile owner after the nationalisation of the mines and as such the agreement, ext., is binding on m/s. bccl the plaintiff also. on this legal aspect .....

Prakash Industries Limited Champa Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... not been substantiated by facts or by actual performance of kilns over the years. v however, in case of use of very high quality raw materials, particularly non-coking coal (say, 14% ash) as in the case of mittal south africa (formerly iscor, south africa) the productive capacity can increase as high as 20% over ..... on 18.06.2007. on 06.11.2006 (annexure p/3), the government of india, through respondent no. 1, advertised a list of 38 coal blocks for captive coal mining for allocation to companies engaged in generation of power, production of iron and steel and production of cements. pursuant thereto, the petitioner made two applications for ..... . in the meeting, it was observed that the committee have limited mandate for consideration of the matter in respect of allocation of coal blocks including vijay central coal block for captive mining under the coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973. the screening committee reiterated the observations made in its last meeting held on 29.06.2011 that there .....

Wardha Power Company Limited Vs. Western Coalfields Limited and Anothe ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

..... the ops on the basis of legal, regulatory and the policy regime in the entire area of production and distribution of coal in india. by virtue of coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973, coal mines were taken over by the central government. subsequently, on creation of op2 in the year 1975, the same were vested ..... in it. op2 (including its subsidiaries) is consequently having a statutory monopoly in the production and sale of non-coking coal in india. as such ..... , the ops were the sole and dominant players in the market of sale of non-coking coal .....

M/s Bharat Cooking Coal Ltd. Vs. Mahendra Pal Bhatia .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... respondents.3. the parliament enacted the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as the nationalisation act ) providing for the acquisition and transfer of the right, title and interest of the owners in respect of coal mines specified in the schedule. the schedule to the nationalisation act contained a list of about 711 coal mines located in different parts of the country ..... reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.5377 of2015m/s bharat coking coal ltd. ...appellant(s) versus mahendra pal bhatia and ors. ...respondent(s) judgment v. ramasubramanian 1. what was contemplated to be a summary proceeding ..... of this court (also of a 3 member bench) in bharat coking coal ltd. vs. madanlal agrawal2, steers clear any air of suspicion. in this case, this court clarified that the extended meaning given to the word mine was to ensure that the activity of mining coal could be carried on in an uninterrupted fashion. this court also .....