Skip to content

Did you mean: defendant?


Codefendant - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: codefendant Year: 1971 Page 1 of about 7 results (0.006 seconds)
Jun 01 1971 (FN)

Nelson Vs. O'Neil

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-01-1971

..... that a cautionary instruction to the jury does not adequately protect the defendant where the codefendant does not testify the court of appeals affirmed stressing that effective confrontation of a witness ..... a severance because the prosecutor intends to introduce an out of court statement by his codefendant that is inadmissible against the moving defendant then the trial court should require the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1971 (FN)

Piccirillo Vs. New York

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-25-1971

..... testified about the bribe attempt several months thereafter the grand jury indicted petitioner and his codefendant for offering a bribe petitioner moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that ..... even under its new interpretation petitioner s conviction was correctly affirmed because he and his codefendant gave no testimony which related or pertained to the offense for which they were prosecuted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 1971 (FN)

Mayberry Vs. Pennsylvania

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-20-1971

..... justice douglas delivered the opinion of the court petitioner and two codefendants were tried in a state court for prison breach and ..... episode took place on the eighth day of the trial a codefendant was cross examining a prison guard and the court sustained objections ..... 7 the seventh charge grew out of an examination of a codefendant by petitioner the following outburst took place by mr mayberry .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 31 1971 (FN)

Harris Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Aug-31-1971

..... that he knew that a truck guided by him and a codefendant in a separate vehicle from one location in los angeles ..... a reputed mexican narcotics trafficker other evidence demonstrated that applicant s codefendant called this number several times prior to the importation of ..... the hearsay declaration however was made over a year after the codefendant s phone calls occurred and the common scheme sought to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 1971 (FN)

Mcgautha Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-03-1971

..... out the course which each trial took a mcgautha s guilt trial mcgautha and his codefendant wilkinson were charged with committing two armed robberies and a murder on february 14 1967 ..... ohio st 2d 212 256 n e 2d 714 1970 footnote 3 53 of course codefendants may be tried by the same jury and some jurors may at some time have .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1971

Hull Vs. U.S.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1971

..... a trial before a jury the government was unable to produce direct evidence that the codefendants had actually crossed the border via the railroad tunnel in fact all the agents could .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 14 1971 (FN)

Motor Coach Employees Vs. Lockridge

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-14-1971

..... its parent are of course separate legal entities for many purposes and were joined as codefendants below so that each appears as a petitioner in this court however both will be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //