Codefendant - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: codefendant Year: 1971 Page 1 of about 7 results (0.006 seconds)Nelson Vs. O'Neil
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-01-1971
..... that a cautionary instruction to the jury does not adequately protect the defendant where the codefendant does not testify the court of appeals affirmed stressing that effective confrontation of a witness ..... a severance because the prosecutor intends to introduce an out of court statement by his codefendant that is inadmissible against the moving defendant then the trial court should require the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPiccirillo Vs. New York
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-25-1971
..... testified about the bribe attempt several months thereafter the grand jury indicted petitioner and his codefendant for offering a bribe petitioner moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that ..... even under its new interpretation petitioner s conviction was correctly affirmed because he and his codefendant gave no testimony which related or pertained to the offense for which they were prosecuted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMayberry Vs. Pennsylvania
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-20-1971
..... justice douglas delivered the opinion of the court petitioner and two codefendants were tried in a state court for prison breach and ..... episode took place on the eighth day of the trial a codefendant was cross examining a prison guard and the court sustained objections ..... 7 the seventh charge grew out of an examination of a codefendant by petitioner the following outburst took place by mr mayberry .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarris Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Aug-31-1971
..... that he knew that a truck guided by him and a codefendant in a separate vehicle from one location in los angeles ..... a reputed mexican narcotics trafficker other evidence demonstrated that applicant s codefendant called this number several times prior to the importation of ..... the hearsay declaration however was made over a year after the codefendant s phone calls occurred and the common scheme sought to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMcgautha Vs. California
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-03-1971
..... out the course which each trial took a mcgautha s guilt trial mcgautha and his codefendant wilkinson were charged with committing two armed robberies and a murder on february 14 1967 ..... ohio st 2d 212 256 n e 2d 714 1970 footnote 3 53 of course codefendants may be tried by the same jury and some jurors may at some time have .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHull Vs. U.S.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1971
..... a trial before a jury the government was unable to produce direct evidence that the codefendants had actually crossed the border via the railroad tunnel in fact all the agents could .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMotor Coach Employees Vs. Lockridge
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-14-1971
..... its parent are of course separate legal entities for many purposes and were joined as codefendants below so that each appears as a petitioner in this court however both will be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial