Court : Karnataka
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION No.51012/2019 (GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION Nos.52575/2019, 15828/2021, 16081/2021, 16088/2021 (GM-RES) IN WP510122019: BETWEEN: SRI BASAVARAJ SHIVAPPA MUTTAGI, S/O SHIVAPPA MUTTAGI, AGED ABOUT37YEARS, R/O MANAGUNDI VILLAGE, DHARWAD TALUK, DHARWAD DIST.-. 580 001. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI SRIKANTH PATIL, ADVOCATE (PHYSICAL HEARING)) AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY, 2 HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2 . CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ANTI CORRUPTION BRANCH, NO.36, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI PRABHULING K NAVADGI, ADVOCATE GENERAL ALONGWITH SRI H.R. SHOWRI, HCGP FOR R1 (PHYSICAL HEARING) SRI S.V. RAJU, ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA ALONGWITH SRI P. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; (VIDEO CONFERENCING) SRI VIVEK S ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION No.51012/2019 (GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION Nos.52575/2019, 15828/2021, 16081/2021, 16088/2021 (GM-RES) IN WP510122019: BETWEEN: SRI BASAVARAJ SHIVAPPA MUTTAGI, S/O SHIVAPPA MUTTAGI, AGED ABOUT37YEARS, R/O MANAGUNDI VILLAGE, DHARWAD TALUK, DHARWAD DIST.-. 580 001. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI SRIKANTH PATIL, ADVOCATE (PHYSICAL HEARING)) AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY, 2 HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2 . CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ANTI CORRUPTION BRANCH, NO.36, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI PRABHULING K NAVADGI, ADVOCATE GENERAL ALONGWITH SRI H.R. SHOWRI, HCGP FOR R1 (PHYSICAL HEARING) SRI S.V. RAJU, ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA ALONGWITH SRI P. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; (VIDEO CONFERENCING) SRI VIVEK S ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION No.51012/2019 (GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION Nos.52575/2019, 15828/2021, 16081/2021, 16088/2021 (GM-RES) IN WP510122019: BETWEEN: SRI BASAVARAJ SHIVAPPA MUTTAGI, S/O SHIVAPPA MUTTAGI, AGED ABOUT37YEARS, R/O MANAGUNDI VILLAGE, DHARWAD TALUK, DHARWAD DIST.-. 580 001. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI SRIKANTH PATIL, ADVOCATE (PHYSICAL HEARING)) AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY, 2 HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2 . CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ANTI CORRUPTION BRANCH, NO.36, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI PRABHULING K NAVADGI, ADVOCATE GENERAL ALONGWITH SRI H.R. SHOWRI, HCGP FOR R1 (PHYSICAL HEARING) SRI S.V. RAJU, ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA ALONGWITH SRI P. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; (VIDEO CONFERENCING) SRI VIVEK S ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION No.51012/2019 (GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION Nos.52575/2019, 15828/2021, 16081/2021, 16088/2021 (GM-RES) IN WP510122019: BETWEEN: SRI BASAVARAJ SHIVAPPA MUTTAGI, S/O SHIVAPPA MUTTAGI, AGED ABOUT37YEARS, R/O MANAGUNDI VILLAGE, DHARWAD TALUK, DHARWAD DIST.-. 580 001. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI SRIKANTH PATIL, ADVOCATE (PHYSICAL HEARING)) AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY, 2 HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2 . CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ANTI CORRUPTION BRANCH, NO.36, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI PRABHULING K NAVADGI, ADVOCATE GENERAL ALONGWITH SRI H.R. SHOWRI, HCGP FOR R1 (PHYSICAL HEARING) SRI S.V. RAJU, ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA ALONGWITH SRI P. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; (VIDEO CONFERENCING) SRI VIVEK S ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
B.D. Agarwal, J.1. Heard Shri Ch. Lokendra learned Counsel for the petitioners and Md. Jallaluddin, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents.2. Both the criminal petitions are admitted for hearing. Considering the urgent nature of the matter and on being consented by the learned Counsel for the parties, both the criminal petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment at the admission stage itself.3. Short facts of the case giving rise to the filing of these criminal petitions are set out below:An FIR was lodged by the Commandant, Home Guards (V/A), Manipur, Imphal to the Porompat Police Station alleging that some Home guard volunteers had forged an order in the name of Dy. Commandant General showing their promotion to the rank of Divisional Commanders from the rank of Senior Platoon Commanders. On internal enquiry, the names of the present petitioners figured as the authors of the alleged promotion order. The FIR was registered as Porompat PS case No. 78 (5) 03 Under ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.1068 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No.6564 of 2019) M/s Gimpex Private Limited ... Appellant Versus Manoj Goel ... Respondent With Criminal Appeal Nos. 1069-1075 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) Nos. 7632-7638 of 2019) 1 JUDGMENT Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J A Factual Background ...........................................................................................3 B Submissions of parties .................................................................................... 12 C Analysis .............................................................................................................1 5 C.1 Parallel prosecutions ................................................................................. 15 C.2 Liability arising from the settlement agreement ..................................... 33 D Conclusion .................................................................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). OF2022(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No(s).39 of 2022) RAMESH CHANDRA GUPTA .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). OF2022(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No(s).4813 of 2022) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). OF2022(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No(s).7052 of 2022) JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.1. Leave granted.2. The instant appeals have been filed against the judgment dated 3rd February, 2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at 1 Allahabad dismissing the criminal miscellaneous application filed at the instance of the present appellants.3. The dispute relates to House No.189, Mohalla Madia, Kanpur Road, Jhansi, which as per the complainant, was purchased in the name of Shravan Kumar Gupta, who was minor at that time, by means of a registered sale deed dated 4th May, 1977 and through the ostensible owner, the de-facto complainant purchased the property by registered sale dee...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jammu and Kashmir
Reported in : 1973CriLJ1033
ORDERBakshi Ishwar Singh, J.1. This is an application under Section 561-A, Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the proceedings under Sections 420/ 406, R. P. C. pending before the Sub-Judge, Judicial Magistrate, Jammu, being taken in the complaint filed by Bhagat Ram, respondent, against the petitioner.2. The facts which have given rise to this petition are that the respondent filed a complaint under. Sections 420/406, R. P. C. against the petitioner with the allegations that the petitioner was working as an Accountant of K. C. Cinema at Faridabad and he was entrusted with the duty of receiving money on behalf of K. C. Cinema on trust and to dispose of the same in accordance with the instructions of the management of K. C. Cinema. As instructed by them, be had to maintain the accounts and deposit the money received, in the Bank of Baroda Faridabad into the account maintained by the partners of the said Cinema. ' The account had to be rendered at Jammu, the Head-office of the complaina...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
CRM M-42904 of 2013(O&M) 1 CRM M-40579 of 2012(O&M) CRM M-38098 of 2012(O&M) CRM M-38099 of 2012(O&M) CRM M-40575 of 2012(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, AT CHANDIGARH --- CRM M-42904 of 2013(O&M) M/S.Tata Chemicals LTD.and another ---Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ---Respondent CRM M-40579 of 2012(O&M) M/S.Tata Chemicals LTD.and another ---Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ---Respondent CRM M-38098 of 2012(O&M) M/S.Tata Chemicals LTD.and another ---Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ---Respondent CRM M-38099 of 2012(O&M) M/S.Tata Chemicals LTD.and another ---Petitioners Versus Kumar Sudhir S201403.03 15:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRM M-42904 of 2013(O&M) 2 CRM M-40579 of 2012(O&M) CRM M-38098 of 2012(O&M) CRM M-38099 of 2012(O&M) CRM M-40575 of 2012(O&M) State of Haryana ---Respondent CRM M-40575 of 2012(O&M) M/S.Tata Chemicals LTD.and another ---Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ---Respondent Date of Decision: February...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : [2000]242ITR89(Mad)
V. Bakthavatsalu, J. Criminal Appeal No. 647 of 1990 :1. This appeal is preferred by the complainant, the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Salem, against the order of acquittal passed in F.O.C.C. No. 341 of 1989. The case of the complainant is that the first accused is a private limited company engaged in running a spinning mill in the name and the style of 'Jawahar Mills Limited'. The second, third and fourth accused are the principal officers of the first accused who are responsible for the conduct of the business. The provisions of Section 269SS of the Income-tax Act, 1961, prescribed the mode of acceptance of any deposit or loan by the income-tax assessee. The above provision has come into force with effect from April 1, 1984. On scrutiny of the books of account of the first accused company for the year March 31, 1985, it was noticed that the first accused accepted the deposit of Rs. 10,000 or more violating the provisions of Section 269SS of the Act. In the case of Vaiya-puri...
Tag this Judgment!