Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Sep-08-2015
:1. : R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE78TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2839/2012 CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.2761/2012, 2766/2012, 2791/2012, 2793/2012, 2794/2012 AND25372013 CRL.A.No.2839/2012 BETWEEN: Smt.Kanchan, Wife of Ananth Vanidesai, Aged 56 years, Occ: Household, R/o Tilakwadi, Belgaum, Belgaum District. .. APPELLANT (By Shri Bahubali A Danawade, Advocate) AND:1. Ravindranath, S/o Ramachandra Chougule, Aged 35 years, Occ: Contractor, R/o Mannur, :2. : Belgaum District.2. Ranjeet, S/o Arjurao Shintre, Aged 36 years, Occ: Business, R/o Pulabhag Galli, CCB No.180, Belgaum.3. Vijayanand @ Dinku, S/o Bapusaheb Shindhe, Aged 37 years, Occ: Discover Seizing Agency, R/o Bachi House No.173, Belgaum Taluk.4. Rajesh, S/o Mahadev Menashe, Aged 40 years, Occ: Painting And Driver, R/o Laxminagar, Plot No.113, Rajadeep Building, Hindalaga, Belgaum.5. Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Sep-07-2015
:1. : R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE78TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2839/2012 CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.2761/2012, 2766/2012, 2791/2012, 2793/2012, 2794/2012 AND25372013 CRL.A.No.2839/2012 BETWEEN: Smt.Kanchan, Wife of Ananth Vanidesai, Aged 56 years, Occ: Household, R/o Tilakwadi, Belgaum, Belgaum District. .. APPELLANT (By Shri Bahubali A Danawade, Advocate) AND:1. Ravindranath, S/o Ramachandra Chougule, Aged 35 years, Occ: Contractor, R/o Mannur, :2. : Belgaum District.2. Ranjeet, S/o Arjurao Shintre, Aged 36 years, Occ: Business, R/o Pulabhag Galli, CCB No.180, Belgaum.3. Vijayanand @ Dinku, S/o Bapusaheb Shindhe, Aged 37 years, Occ: Discover Seizing Agency, R/o Bachi House No.173, Belgaum Taluk.4. Rajesh, S/o Mahadev Menashe, Aged 40 years, Occ: Painting And Driver, R/o Laxminagar, Plot No.113, Rajadeep Building, Hindalaga, Belgaum.5. Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-18-2015
(Prayers: This Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to quash the P.C.R.No.11/2012 on the file of the 23rd Additional City Civil and Special Judge, Bangalore City and all consequential proceedings thereon, in so far this petitioner (accused no.4) is concerned (Annexure-A).) This Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to quash the entire criminal proceedings in Spl.C.C.No.137/2012 pending on the file of the XXIII Additional City Civil and Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption Act, Bangalore City as against the petitioner. This Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to quash the complaint PCR No.10 and 11/2012 on the file of the XXIII Additional City and Civil and Sessions Judge, and Special Judge, Bangalore and order dated 7.3.2012 referring the said complaint under sub Section (3) of Section 156 of Criminal Procedure code for investigation by the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Sep-08-2015
(Prayers: This Criminal Appeal is filed under section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to set aside the judgment and order of acquittal of accused/respondent no,5 and modify the order of conviction and sentence passed against accused/respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 6 in SC No. 9/29008 dated 11.06.2012, enhance the sentence of accused/respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 6 and convict accused /respondent no. 1 to 6 with death sentence in SC No. 9/2008 registered for the offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 120(B), 109, 364, 342, 376, 302,404, 201, and 203 read with section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and award just and reasonable compensation as enshrined in Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. This Criminal Appeal is filed under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to call for the records in S.C. No. 9/2008 on the file of the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belgaum, pursue the same, allow the appeal and set aside ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-30-2015
(Prayers: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to quash the complaint dt.9.2.12, as per Ann-A and FIR dt.8.3.12 as per Ann-B in respect of the petitioners, the initiation of proceedings by the R2 vide the first information report Crime No.20/12, pending before [the lokayukta police bangalore] the Hon'ble 23RD Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore City at Bangalore and designated special under Chapter II of the prevention of Corruption Act 1988 and all further proceedings and etc.,. This Crl.P. is filed U/s.482 Cr.P.C praying to quash the first information report bearing Crime No.20/2012 dated:8.3.12 registered by the respondent - police on the file of the Spl. JUDGE, XXIII Addl. Dist., and S.J., Bangalore City, (Annexure-A), in so far as the petr. is concerned. This Crl.P. is filed U/s.482 Cr.P.C praying to quash the first information report bearing Crime No.20/2012 dated:26.3.12 registered by the respondent - police on the file of the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Nov-17-2015
(Prayers: This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to set aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11/12.02.2013 passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belgaum in S.C.No. 72/2012 and acquit the appellant. This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to set aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11/12.02.2013 passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belgaum in S.C.No. 378/2011 and acquit them.) 1. These appeals are heard and disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The facts of the case, as stated by the prosecution, in the appeal in Crl.A. 2582/2013, arising out of the judgment in sessions case no. SC 378/2011 on the file of the Court of II Additional District and Sessions Judge at Belgaum, are as follows: The complainant, one Mahadev Siddaram Hulloli, was said to be a resident of Itnal village, Raibag Taluk, Belgaum District...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-20-2015
(Prayer: Crl.A. U/s.374 (2) Cr.P.C by the Adv., For the appellant praying that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to set aside the judgment of conviction of sentence DT.4/6.5.2010 passed by the I ADDL. S.J. D.K. Mangalore in SC. No. 125/2007 Convicting the Appellant/Accused for the offence P/U/S 498A and 304B of IPC and U/S 4 of the D.P. Act. The Appellant/Accused to undergo R.I. for a period of 3 (Three) years and also sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default to pay the fine, he shall further undergo S.I. for a period of one year, for the offence P/U/S 498A of IPC. The Appellant/Accused to undergo R.I. for a period of 12 (Twelve) years.For the offence P/U/S 304B of IPC. Appellant/accused to undergo R.I. for a period of 2(TWO) years and also pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- in default to pay fine, the accused shall undergo SI for a period of one year. For the offence P/U/S 4 of the D.P. Act all the Substantive sentences shall run concurrently and etc.) 1. The present appeal is dire...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-09-2015
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed U/S 378 (1) and (3) Cr.P.C. by the State P.P. for the state praying to grant leave to file an appeal against the judgment and Order of Acquittal dated: 31.10.11 passed by the Prl. Sessions Judge, Tumkur in S.C. No. 43/09- Acquitting the Respondent/Accused for the offence P/U/S. 436 of IPC.) 1. The judgment and order of acquittal dated 31.10.2011 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Tumkur in Sessions Case No. 43/2009 is appealed by the State. By the impugned judgment, the Court below has acquitted the sole accused for the offence punishable under Section 436 of IPC. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that, at about 12.30 p.m. on 09.11.2008, when the first informant (PW.1) and his wife were attending to the agricultural work in their agricultural field, the friend of PW. 1 Sri Thimmanna went and informed the first informant and his wife that the first informant's hut is put on fire; immediately, the first informant and his wife and some ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-09-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 :PRESENT: R THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN M SHANTANAGOUDAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.226/2012 ... APPELLANT BETWEEN: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA POLICE SUB INSPECTOR PATTANAYAKANAHALLI POLICE STATION SIRA TALUK (BY SRI CHETAN DESAI, HCGP) AND: RANGASWAMY S/O LATE GIRIYAPPA AGED26YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O GOLLARAHALLI, SIRA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT (BY SRI SIJI MALAYIL, ADV. FOR M/S. SIJI MALAYIL ASSOCIATES SRI VAGEESH HIREMATH, AMICUS CURIAE) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S3781) AND (3) CR.P.C BY THE STATE P.P. FOR THE STATE PRAYING TO GRANT LEAVE TO FILE AN APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER OF ACQUITTAL DATED:31. 10.11 PASSED BY THE PRL. SESSIONS IN S.C.NO.43/09- ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.436 OF IPC. ... RESPONDENT JUDGE, TUMKUR2THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY MOHAN M SHANTANAGOUDAR DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- JUDGMENT The jud...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Nov-17-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF NOVEMBER2015PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2590 OF2013CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2582 OF2013IN CRL.A.No.2590/2013 P BETWEEN: Shri Suresh Dhareppa Mutnal, Aged about 35 years, Occupation Advocate, Resident of Itnal, Taluk: Raibag, District Belgaum. APPELLANT (By Shri Ravi B Naik, Senior Advocate for Shri J.Basavaraj, Advocate) AND: The State of Karnataka By its State Public Prosecutor, Advocate General Office, 2 High Court Circuit Bench Premises, Dharwad 580 011. RESPONDENT (By Shri V.M.Banakar, Additional State Public Prosecutor) Shri Channappa Dhareppa Mutnal, Aged about 32 years, Occupation: Agriculture, This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to set aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11/12.02.2013 passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Jud...
Tag this Judgment!