Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coast guard act 1978 section 27 losing ship or aircraft Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 56 results (0.439 seconds)

Union Territory Chandigarh and Another Vs. Central Administrative Trib ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... only they are charged for corruption under the act, but they have been accused for criminal breach of trust for which they are charged under sections 406, 409, 420 and 120-b of the indian penal code. cwp no ..... , the government is in a position to recover the pecuniary loss from the gratuity payable. that, in fact, is the intention behind even section 4 of the payment of gratuity act, 1972.6. as noted above, in the present case, the charges which are levelled against the respondents no.2 to 6 in the said fir are of serious nature. not ..... , u.t., chandigarh under section 13(1)(a)(b)(c)(d) and sub section 2 of section 13 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the cwp no.562 of 2012 (o&m) -2- act) read with sections 406, 409, 420 and 120-b of the indian penal code. the fir was registered against one mr. k.k .....

Devinder Singh Vs. the Collector and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1995)110PLR288

..... hearing to the person aggrieved, must be satisfied that such sale, lease, contract or agreement has been entered into in contravention of any of the provisions of the act or the rules made thereunder, or has been entered into as a result of fraud or concealment of facts, or is detrimental to the interest of the panchayat. ..... to be vested in it, whether such (sale, lease) contract or agreement is entered into before or after the commencement of the punjab village common lands (regulation) amendment act, 1964, and examine such record for the purpose of satisfying himself as to the legality or propriety of such (sale, lease) contract or agreement.(2) where, on ..... and the collector are without jurisdiction having been passed on complaint filed by respondent no. 3, section 10-a of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 (in short, 1961 act) requires to be noticed:-'10-a. power of assistant collector of first grade to cancel or vary (sales or lease) etc. of the lands vested in .....

Fao No. 2712 of 2005 Vs. Maya Devi and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... had nothing to do with the user of the vehicle. as such, claimants are not entitled to any compensation from the insurance company under section 163-a of the act. accordingly, the impugned award is set aside and the claim petition under section 163-a stands dismissed. the appeal is allowed. (kuldip singh) judge143.2014 sjks sharma ..... as the case may be. explanation. for the purposes of this sub-section, permanent disability . shall have the same meaning and extent as in the workmen s compensation act, 1923. (2) in any claim for compensation under sub-section (1).the claimant shall not be required to plead or establish that the death or permanent disablement in ..... the award dated 1.4.2005, passed by the motor accident claim tribunal, patiala (in short 'the tribunal').under section 163-a of the motor vehicle act, 1988 (in short 'the act').the facts claimed by the claimants before the tribunal are reproduced verbatim as under :- the deceased chotta lal alias chotta ram son of sh. shankar sharma .....

Manjit Singh Dhillon Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1837

..... and sunday). thus, there is no delay in consideration of the detainee's representation by the central government or the detaining authority. the detaining authority has acted promptly and diligently in issuing the detention order. 16. the search warrant was shown to the wife of the petitioner at the time of search and ..... -1997 by the joint secretary i.e. detaining authority; (vi) further, the petitioners made a representation to the central government under section 11 of the cofeposa act addressed to secretary, government of india, ministry of finance, which has been considered by the joint secretary (cofeposa). the representation was not addressed to the joint ..... not addressed to the joint secretary cofeposa, the second-respondent, but was addressed to the secretary of government of india under section 11 of the cofeposa act. no communication regarding consideration of the representation dated 17-3-1997 by the central government was received. 5. the petitioners were informed in jail on 6 .....

Bansal Alloys and Metals (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [2009]22STT250

..... 's case (supra) followed the view expressed in flock (india) (p.) ltd. 's case (supra) although the refund claimed by the assessee was under the customs act, 1962. in priya blue industries ltd.'s case (supra) the importer paid the duty assessed under protest. therefore, it was held that without assessment order having been modified ..... jurisdiction.16. in flock (india) (p.) ltd.s' case (supra) the question involved was with regard to rate of duty leviable under the central excise act, 1944 read with central excise rules. the assessee therein claimed that product in question was wrongly classified under a particular tariff item number instead it ought to be ..... weight given in the bills of entry, as is manifestly clear from the examination report annexure a-1.10. a reading of relevant reproduced provisions of the act reveals that, the appellant-importer/assessee was required to present to the proper officer a bill of entry for home consumption containing the particulars of goods being .....

National Bank of Lahore Ltd. Vs. Sohan Lal Saigal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1962P& H534

..... of the ornaments and jewellery etc. which may be placed in that locker (paragraphs 6 and 7). no watchman had been kept by the bank to keep proper guard over the safe deposit vault and the door of the corridor leading to it. the previous lock of the locker leased out to the plaintiffs had also not been ..... dehra dun mussoorie electric tramway co., ltd. v. hansraj, air 1935 all 995. the dehra dun mussoorie electric tramway company had been floated by bilti shah gilani who acted as the managing agent. later on the company went into compulsory liquidation. as a result of misfeasance proceedings against bilti shah and the auditors, they were directed to make ..... is accomplished, be returned or otherwise disposed of according to the directions of the person delivering them'. as has been pointed out in pollock and mulla's indian contract act (8th edition), it was the late mr. justice story's work on bailment and agency, which had acquired a classical reputation, which had been largely used in the .....

S. Hardam Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1983P& H340

..... therefore, becomes imperative to undertake legislature to control and regulate colonisation by private colonisers.'what then equally calls for attention is the preamble of the act:--'an act to regulate the colonies in the state of punjab with a view to preventing their haphazard and ill-planned growth.'that the aforesaid is indeed a ..... are not only laudable but indeed are an essential social necessity in modern urbanisation. far from being in any way unconstitutional, the provisions of the act subserve to the larger social purpose against the narrowly acquisitive ones of individual financial gain and are clearly within the ambit of reasonable restrictions. these provisions ..... larger purpose of curbing or prohibiting the haphazard and ill-planned growth of urban and suburban areas, the restrictions sought to be placed by the act are plainly reasonable and intended to prevent grave and irreversible mischief which may arise from the creation of slums and shanty towns by unscrupulous landowners .....

Ajmer Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)113PLR113

..... its employees gratuity on the termination of his employment after he has rendered continuous service of not less than five years. employee within the meaning of the aforesaid act means any person employed on wages in any establishment, factory, mine, oil filed plantation, port, railway company or shop to do any skilled, semi-skilled, ..... obligation of making payment to the petitioners. it is, however, conceded that the petitioners which was being run by the trust registered under the indian trust act. it is also conceded that the colleges in which the petitioners were employed were affiliated with the punjab university. regarding the payment of house rent allowance ..... for the grant of appropriate relief. it is submitted that the respondent-employers were liable to pay the amount of gratuity under the payment of gratuity act, 1972, rules of the punjab government and of the punjab university. the petitioners have further submitted that they have been regularly contributing towards the provident .....

Chander Bhushan Anand and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Financ ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)139PLR400

..... it has been directed that the provisions of the aforesaid rent act shall not apply to the 'buildings and rented lands' whose monthly rent exceeds rs. 1500/-, has given rise to these bunch of writ petitions (civil writ petition nos. 20221 and 20232 of 2003, 1829, 1978 to 2065, 2689, 3902, 7360, 7836, 9855 and 11029 to 11034 of 2004 ..... having regard to the surrounding circumstances and facts and that the classification can be done on income basis or rental basis or some other reasonable basis and the safe-guard provided in article 14 of the constitution cannot be invoked till the classification is found to have a nexus with the object sought to be achieved: that no ..... of business or trade and also for the purpose of residence.explanation: for the purposes of this clause, residence in a building only for the purpose of guarding it, shall not be deemed to convert a 'non-residential building' to a 'residential building'.special provision as to pending cases - the provisions of the principal .....

Hari Chand Vs. Gram Panchayat

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)112PLR590

..... year 1966, yet the gram panchayat without any legal basis sought eviction of the petitioners under section 7 of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 (for short 'the act') which prayer has been illegally granted by the prescribed authority and further appeal filed by the petitioners too met with same fate. the petitioners have ..... wholly without authority and so the same does not confer any right upon the petitioners nor protect them in any manner.in fact, this was a collusive act between the erstwhile sarpanch and the petitioners thereby not debarring the gram panchayat from evicting these unauthorised occupants. otherwise too, such a sale does not come within ..... title. examined in the context of facts as have been on record, neither the prescribed authority while deciding the application under section 7(2) of the act nor the collector while hearing/deciding the appeal have eared to refer to these assertions or to the record of gram panchayat while discarding the evidence of .....