Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coast guard act 1978 chapter xiii miscellaneous Sorted by: old Page 5 of about 12,504 results (0.319 seconds)

General Motors Acceptance Corp. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... adopted by the government for the repression of the crime of smuggling. the provisions of the revised statutes, 3061 and 3062, which carried forward the provisions of earlier acts (act of july 18, 1866, c. 201, 14 stat. 178, 3), have in turn been page 286 u. s. 57 carried forward into the united ..... transportation within, or their exportation from, the united states, just as it distinguishes each of these activities from manufacture and from sale. the national prohibition act maintains the same distinction. sections 3061 and 3062 of the revised statutes are aimed at importation from without the united states, and not at transportation within. ..... customs service. the seizures were effected by customs officers." "all four drivers of the cars were arrested. each was charged with violations of the tariff act of 1930 -- namely unlawfully importing liquor into the united states and knowingly concealing and facilitating the transportation of such liquor. each indictment alleged failure to obtain .....

Abdul Samad Khan Vs. Anjuman Islamia and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1934All56

..... ram v. babu lal : air1932all485 , which was a case in which the plaintiff had claimed a declaration and also cancellation of an instrument under section 39, sp. relief act. it was held that the relief of cancellation was a consequential relief and therefore the suit should not be regarded as one for declaration only. in those circumstances, ad valorem ..... recorded his note on the 4th november 1932, and the matter ha& been laid before the taxing officer, whose decision is final under section 5 of the court-fees act, the position would have been different. the taxing officer's decision, at any rate, regarding the court-fees paid in this court, would have been final. this has ..... had been contested within the aforesaid time, the case would have been laid before the taxing officer whose decision would have been final under section 5, court-fees act. it is open to question whether the taxing officer's decision which is final so far as court-fee payable on the memorandum of appeal in this court is .....

Parmeshar Singh and ors. Vs. SitladIn Dube and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1934All626; 150Ind.Cas.1096

..... . their lordships referred to an english decision and remarked thatit is, they think, always dangerous to apply english decisions to the construction of an indian act.49. having said so, their lordships continued:the clause there under consideration differed widely from that now before their lordships and indeed from the clauses with ..... proceed on the assumption that for the purposes of that appeal without affirming its correctness, that suit came within the terms of article 97, limitation act. their lordships further pointed out that section 14 authorized a suit against a zamindar for the reversal of a sale under the regulation and it expressly ..... india unanimously that article 181 applies to the application for the preparation of a final decree in a mortgage suit. the corresponding article under the old act could never have been applicable to such decrees. the argument mentioned above cannot therefore be accepted. in interpreting therefore whether the application for restitution is, .....

Rurmal Ram Nath Vs. Kapil Man Misir and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1935All353; 153Ind.Cas.65

..... section 115, civil p.c. except where a suit or a miscellaneous case equivalent thereto, arising under a special enactment, such as the guardians and wards act, insolvency act, etc., has been finally disposed of. observations to the effect that no revision is maintainable against an interlocutory order passed in a pending suit are to ..... by the defendant. the court settled that controversy by its order of that date which directed that the arbitration should continue and appointed b. ganesh prasad to act as arbitrator. the controversy thus terminated. we think that the order of the learned subordinate juries in that connexion was clearly an order deciding a case.3 ..... s order. in jagannnath sahu v. chedi sahu : air1929all144 , an arbitrator who had been appointed by the court at the request of the parties refused to act and the-defendant nominated certain other persons and prayed that any one of them be appointed as arbitrator. the plaintiff objected and prayed that the arbitration be superseded; .....

Phani Bhusan Sen Vs. Sanat Kumar Maitra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1935Cal773

..... was persisted in was that the petitioner was not qualified to stand for election by reason of the provisions of section 22, sub-8. (2), bengal municipal act (bengal act 15 of 1932). that sub-section is in these terms:if any person is or has been convicted by a criminal court of any such offence as in the ..... commissioners are to carry on their functions notwithstanding that the election of some or all of them may be under challenge in proceedings taken under section 36 of the act (section 41). the publication in the calcutta gazette of the name of a person as an elected commissioner does not in my judgment prevent proceedings for setting aside ..... court,6. sir james colvile then remarked as follows:this provision, their lordships conceive, expressly makes applicable to a proceeding to compel registration under the registration act the whole procedure of act 8 of 1859, including a power of admitting a review.7. it is urged that the view that i am taking is inconsistent with the judgment of .....

Ratanchand Lallumal, in Re.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1936]4ITR189(All)

..... the time when the bigger family can be said to have separated. from what has been stated before us it is clear that there was a private partition in sambat 1978 corresponding to october 1921 between raja sir moti chand, babu shiva prasad gupta, babu karakh chand, rai bahadur makund lal and other members of the bigger family. the ..... has concealed the particulars of his income or has deliberately furnished inaccurate particulars of his income and is, therefore, liable to penalty under section 28 of the income tax act ?in order to answer the questions satisfactorily it will be necessary to state a few facts. the reference has arisen out of the assessment made in the year ..... 16, 1934, passed by a bench of this court the commissioner of income tax was directed under the provision of section 66 (3) of the indian income tax act to state a case on certain questions, the commissioner having refused to state the same on the application of the assessee under section 66 (1). the questions formulated by .....

In Re: Ratan Chand Lallu Mal

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1936All279; 163Ind.Cas.324

..... time when the bigger family can be said to have separated. prom what has been stated before us, it is clear that there was a private partition in sambat 1978 corresponding to october 1921 between raja sir moti chand, babu shiva prasad gupta, babu harakh chand, rai bahadur makund lal and other members of the bigger family. the ..... previous years to tax it in the assessment year when the transaction was finally closed. this is in the teeth of the provisions of section 3, income-tax act. the only question is whether the transaction having been closed in the assessment year it is possible for the authorities to take into consideration the receipts not only ..... has concealed the particulars of his income or has deliberately furnished inaccurate particulars of his income and is therefore liable to a penalty under section 28, income-tax act? in order to answer the questions satisfactorily it will be necessary to state a few facts. the reference has arisen out of the assessment made in the year .....

Shyam Sundar Lal and anr. Vs. DIn Shah and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1937All10; 166Ind.Cas.812

..... . as regards the other sections not specified, the provision in (d) is to the following effect:and nothing in any other provision of this act shall render invalid or in any way affect anything already done before the 1st april 1930, in any proceeding pending in a court on that date.4. the provision quoted ..... in tota ram v. ram lal : air1932all489 , decided by a pull bench of which one of us was a member, the point was made clear that section 63 of act 20 of 1929 had prevented only certain specified sections from having a retrospective effect, and therefore by implication it was intended that the other sections should have such an effect ..... 1930, when section 53-a came into operation, the section was not applicable. these were observations which were not necessary for the purposes of the case, and section 63 of act 20 of 1929 was apparently not brought to their notice.3. the case in gauri shankar v. gopal das : air1934all701 , decided by mukerji, j., was also a case .....

Sir Aditya NaraIn Singh Bahadur (Maharaja of Benares) Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1938]6ITR217(All)

..... not think that the position is affected. we are clearly of opinion that the question before us must be decided by reference to the provisions of the indian act alone, and we would hesitate to draw any support from foreign authorities based on the english law.it has been held on several occasions by various courts that ..... no. (2) reads as follows :-'granting that the assessee was a non-resident, was the income tax officer precluded by any provision of the act from serving a notice on him without appointing an agent within the meaning of section 43' ?the commissioners opinion is that the question should due answered in the negative. ..... . 47,174 but otherwise upheld the assessment of the income-tax officer.thereafter an application was made to the commissioner of income tax under section 66(2) of the act, requiring him to state a case for the decision of this court upon certain questions. three questions of law have been referred as by the commissioner. of these, .....

Jotiram Dalsukhram Vs. Bai Diwali

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1939Bom154; (1939)41BOMLR239

..... a special place among the heirs of stridhan property. according to the mayukha she is expressly mentioned as an heir to males. apart from statute (hindu law of inheritance amendment act ii of 1929) her place in the bombay presidency is determined by a series of decisions. it is immediately after the father's mother both under the mitakshara and the ..... me that the sacramental idea attending marriage among hindus would apply with equal force to a widow's marriage. there is nothing in the enactment of 1856 (hindu widows remarriages act) to deprive the parties to the marriage from adopting any of the forms prescribed by the hindu shastras if they chose. in my opinion the taint, if i may say .....