Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coast guard act 1978 chapter xiii miscellaneous Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Page 7 of about 2,194 results (0.100 seconds)

A.P. Krishnasami Naidu Etc. Vs. State of Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC1515; [1964]7SCR82

..... in the case of members of joint hindu family; nor are we able to understand why this discrimination which clearly result from the application of s. 5(1) of the act is not violative of art. 14 of the constitution. examples can be multiplied with reference to joint hindu families which would show that discrimination will result on the application of ..... five members of a natural family. under the hindu law each member would be entitled to one-fifth share in the 300 standard acres belonging to the family. under the act however the two major sons will keep 30 standard acres each while the father and the two minor sons together will keep 30 standard acres which work out to 10 ..... mainly concerned with persons holding lands in ryotwari settlement or in any other way subject to payment of revenue direct to the government. it is not in dispute that the act is not protected under art. 31-a of the constitution and it is in this background that we shall consider the attack based on art. 14 on the two main .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (We ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC1903; [1964(9)FLR124]; [1964]53ITR466(SC); [1964]7SCR892

..... an absolute monarch represented a legislative act all relevant factors must be considered before the question was answered. these relevant factors were, the nature of the order, the scope and effect of its ..... , it was held that this court had not laid down a general proposition about the irrelevance or inapplicability of the well-recognised distinction between legislative and executive acts in regard to the orders issued by absolute monarchs and that the true legal position was that whenever a dispute arose as to whether an order passed by ..... be dealt with together. the respondent the gwalior rayon silk manufacturing (weaving) company limited (hereinafter referred to as the company) is registered under the indian companies act. it is necessary to set out how the company came to be established in order to understand the case put forward by the company. in october 1946 messrs .....

Shri Roshanlal Gautam Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC991; [1965]1SCR841

..... that while s. 68c makes a mention of an 'efficient, adequate, economical and properly co-ordinated road transport service' 'in the public interest' the u.p. act merely mentioned 'the interest of the general public' 'subserving the common good or for maintaining and developing efficient road transport system.' the change of verbiage, however, does ..... not make a change in the requirements. it would be wrong to think that even under the u.p. act government would not think of an 'adequate', 'economical' or 'properly co-ordinated' road transport service when it chose to provide road transport services for the common ..... arguments which support the contention of the respondents. under s. 68b the provisions of chapter iva apply notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in chapter iv of the act. sections 46 to 49 are in chapter iv and no inconsistency between a scheme framed under s. 68c and any provision of chapter iv can be .....

Mahjibhai Mohanbhai Barot Vs. Patel Manibhai Gokalbhai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC1477; 1965(0)BLJR542; [1965]2SCR436

..... instituted for the purpose of obtaining any restitution or other relief which could be obtained by application under sub-section (1). the first schedule to the limitation act period time from which description of application of period begins limitation to run art. 181. applications for when the right to which no period of apply accrues. ..... varied or reversed. nor indeed does this duty or jurisdiction arise merely under the said section. it is inherent in the general jurisdiction of the court to act rightly and fairly according to the circumstances towards all parties involved." the section, to avoid the earlier conflict, prescribes the procedure, defines the powers of the ..... restitution was not an application for execution of a decree and if the restitution was stayed by a second appellate court, under s. 15 of the limitation act the time during which the party was prevented from applying for restitution could not be excluded, even if ultimately the appeal was dismissed, with the result the .....

Corporation of Calcutta and anr. Vs. Liberty Cinema

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC1107; [1965]2SCR477

..... question of legislative competence matters are dealt with not strictly within any ordinary definition of "fishery" affords no ground for putting an unnatural construction upon the words "sea coast and inland fisheries". lastly, it may be pointed out that the territory of india now embraces what were formerly the territory of ruling princes in which there were ..... , as pointed out by lord tomlin in dealing with a contention as to the meaning of 53.3 the word "fisheries" in "sea coast and inland fisheries" in s. 91 of the british north america act, 1867 in attorney general for canada v. attorney general for british columbia and ors(1): "he (the appellant) supports his contention by referring ..... have explained earlier as used in entry 66 of list 11 or is it a tax. for this purpose it is necessary to examine the scheme of the act. the act contains 615 sections and these are divided into 3 8 chapters each with a heading indicating the subject dealt with in it. these several chapters are themselves .....

Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... its clientele to white persons, three-fourths of whom are transient interstate travelers, sued for declaratory relief and to enjoin enforcement of the civil rights act of 1964, contending that the prohibition of racial discrimination in places of public accommodation affecting commerce exceeded congress' powers under the commerce clause and violated ..... substantially to affect interstate commerce. we therefore conclude that the civil rights cases have no relevance to the basis of decision here, where the act explicitly relies upon the commerce power and where the record is filled with testimony of obstructions and restraints resulting from the discriminations found to be ..... see that congress may -- as it has -- prohibit racial discrimination by motels serving travelers, however "local" their operations may appear. nor does the act deprive appellant of liberty or property under the fifth amendment. the commerce power invoked here by the congress is a specific and plenary one authorized by the .....

American Ship Building Co. Vs. Labor Board

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the record that one other local business agent gave a similar assurance. [ footnote 2/4 ] see 1 williston, contracts 38, 39 (3d ed. 1957); cf. pacific coast association of pulp & paper manufacturers, 121 n.l.r.b. 990, 993. [ footnote 2/5 ] see, e.g., the secondary boycott and organizational picketing restrictions. ..... , it sought to accomplish that result by conferring certain affirmative rights on employees and by placing certain enumerated restrictions on the activities of employers. the act prohibited acts which interfered with, restrained, or coerced employees in the exercise of their rights to organize a union, to bargain collectively, and to strike; it ..... in countervailance to the employers' bargaining power, and having established a system of collective bargaining whereby the newly coequal adversaries might resolve their disputes, the act also contemplated resort to economic weapons should more peaceful measures not avail. sections 8(a)(1) and (3) do not give the board a general .....

Ahmedabad Mill Owners' Association Etc. Vs. the Textile Labour Associa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC497; [1966]1SCR382

..... urged before us that the view taken by the industrial court is not justified by the terms of s. 73 read along with s. 42 of the act.23. the act was passed by the bombay legislature in 1947. it purports to regulate the relations of employers and employees, to make provision for settlement of industrial disputes, ..... 'industrial dispute' does not justify the assumption that it is only a notice of change that brings into existence an industrial dispute. section 3(17) of the act defines an 'industrial dispute' as meaning any dispute or difference between an employer and employee or between employers and employees or between employees and employees and which is ..... the appellant association; and that made it necessary for the government of gujarat to refer the present dispute to the industrial court at gujaratunder s. 73 of the act. that, broadly stated, is thebackground and the previous history of the present dispute.22. at the hearing of the present reference before the industrial court, the .....

Jan Mohammad Noor Mohammad Begban Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC385; [1966]1SCR505

..... certain areas as markets and for setting up market yards in which the business of selling and buying agricultural produce may be carried on, the act provides for the constitution of market committees authorised to maintain and manage the markets and to effectuate supervision, prevent adulteration and promote grading and ..... state agricultural produce market fund. chapter vi prohibits the collection of trade allowances, other than allowances prescribed by rules or bye-laws made under the act. chapter vii deals with offences, penalties, investigation and procedure for the. trial of offences. chapter viii deals with the control by the director and ..... of buying and selling of agricultural produce and the establishment of markets for agricultural produce in the state of gujarat. section 2 defines various expressions in the act. agricultural produce is defined as meaning all produce, whether processed or not, of agriculture, horticulture and animal husbandry, specified in the schedule, [cl. [ .....

Calcutta Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. their Workmen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1286; [1967(14)FLR345]; (1967)IILLJ1SC; [1967]2SCR596

..... of mr. sen that the tribunal could not direct that the employees should have leave in excess of the limits specified in the west bengal shops and establishments act, 1963. as a matter of fact, the employees were enjoying leave at a rate which exceeded the limits prescribed. taking all these matters into consideration, we ..... first category benefit of 30 days leave with wages was given while the workers in the second category were to have leave as per section 79 of the factories act. it was observed by this court : 'generally, in the matter of providing leave reles, industrial adjudication prefers to have similar conditions of service in the same ..... and was doing exclusively life insurance business until 1948. thereafter it started general insurance business on a very small scale. after the passing of the life insurance corporation act of 1956 and the taking over of the life insurance business of the company by the corporation, its activities were very much reduced. the paid-up capital .....