Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coast guard act 1978 chapter xiii miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 1 of about 1,097 results (0.148 seconds)

Md. Abbas Mohideen Vs. Government of India Rep. by Secretary to Govern ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)IILLJ587Mad

..... fault diagnosis thereby committed an offence under section 16 of coast guard act, 1978.d. showed total irresponsible and careless attitude in fault diagnosis and repair of defects affecting the ship's operational efficiency and delay in repair process ..... committed an offence under section 16 of coast guard act, 1978.c. grossly derelicted his duty by allowing the damage to get compounded on port d.a in overheated condition over a long period without proper ..... board d.a after ingress of sea water leading to deterioration of material state of starboard d.a thereby committed an offence under section 16 of coast guard act, 1978.b. knowingly concealed the vital information of sea water ingress in star board d.a from his commanding officer, administrative authority and repair agency thereby .....

S. Rajesh Vs. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Salem and Others

Court : Chennai

..... wrong, as there was no permission granted to him even to participate. all coast guard personnel are governed by the coast guard act, 1978 and the rules framed thereunder. as per section 9 of the coast guard act, 1978, resignation is not a matter of right. the coast guard is a specialized one, imparting intensive training to the officers in order to ..... safeguard the coastal line and due to huge requirement in the coast guard, such a person ..... the 3rd respondent herein. the 3rd respondent citing the circular dated 7.4.2006, has stated that the petitioner could not be relieved from the coast guard to participate in the selection process and hence, rejected the application of the petitioner as early as on 6.4.2015. thereafter, the petitioner had .....

Society of Auditors and Etc. Vs. Comptroller and Auditor General of In ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2000Mad92

..... find any force in the argument of mr. arvind p. datar, relying on the decisions in mohinder singh gill v. chief election commissioner reported in : [1978]2scr272 and commissioner of police v. gordhandas reported in : [1952]1scr135 , that the respondents are trying to supplement fresh reasons by filing counter to substantiate ..... form indirectly, which the institute cannot seek directly under form-a of schedule '1'.24.8. mr. arvind p. datar contends that the act itself intends to regulate the profession of chartered accountants, and therefore, these particulars and documents are not at all relevant for assessing the professional and ..... of chartered accountants and for that purpose to establish an institute of chartered accountants (hereinafter referred to as 'the institute').4.1. the following provisions of the act are relevant to be mentioned.the terms 'chartered accountant', 'council', 'institute', 'holder of restricted certificate' and 'registrar' arc defined as follows :'section 2(1 .....

Lakshminarayan Reddiar Vs. T.K.S. Balarama Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1984Mad370; (1985)1MLJ148

..... . on the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that owing to the operation of the provisions of tamil nadu,' ordinance v of 1978 and later tamil nadu act 40 of 1978, the respondent was prevented by statute from recovering the entire amount due under the promissory notes, but was permitted to recover only one half of the ..... under. the promissory notes would not lie. ' the inability of the respondent to recover the entire amount on the promissory notes under the provisions of t. n. act 40 of 1978, was not on account of any fault of the, respondent. however, with reference. to the liability of the petitioner arising on the promissory notes sued upon in 0 ..... the portion of the claim. on the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent would point.. out that having regard to the provisions of t. n. act 40 of 1978, as they then stood, the respondent was not entitled to include the whole of the claim in his suit and there was no intentional relinquishment or omission to .....

Manimekalai Ammal and 5 Others Vs. Swamidorai Padayatchi and 4 Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2001)2MLJ826

..... under which the period of bar was extended from one year was ultimately enlarged to two years and six months by the tamil nadu debt relief laws (amendment) act 1978 (tamil nadu act 2 of 1978) since act 15 of 1976 came into force on 16.1.1976. section 3, as it finally stood, imposed a bar against institutions of suits for a period of ..... by way of scaling down of debts. to give effect to the said object, the tamil nadu debt relief act, 1979 (act 40 of 1979) (hereinafter referred to as the 1979 act) was enacted. section 31 of the 1979 act repealed the tamilnadu debt relief act, 1978 and sub-section 29 thereof. section 32 and 33, which are relevant for the purpose of this case, ..... between 15.1.1976 and 13.6.1979.5. the tamil nadu debt relief act 1978 (act 40 of 1978) was enacted to provide relief for certain indebted persons in the state of tamil nadu. the said act came into force from 15.7.1978. chapter ii of the said act dealt with the relief of indebtness and the scaling down of debts. as per .....

S. Ramabadran Another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Another

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1991Mad371

..... the respondents are authorised to levy and collect from the appellant-company electricity charge under the tamil nadu revision of tariff rates on supply of electrical energy act, 1978 (tamil nadu act 1 of 1979) only on the basis of the assurance given by the first respondent in the writ petitions in their communication no. 138115/u2/75- ..... by law. therefore, the subsequent developments, viz., the statutory agreement entered into between the appellant-company on 6-10-1978 and the board as well as mandate of the legislature contained in the tamil nadu act 1 of 1979 become very much relevant and their inevitable impact upon the so called assurance also requires to be considered ..... that this difference was reconciled to by the appellant-company and then only they entered into the agreement dated 6-10-1978 for the supply of electrical energy. the respondents also point out that as per the taxation act, the h.t. chemical industries in non-metropolitan area were subject to levy of tax at 3.75% and .....

P. Gopirathnam and 4 Others Vs. Ferrodous Estate (Pvt.) Ltd., Rep. by ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC181

..... , the agreements could not have been performed, without the permission to sell as per section 26 of the 1976 act...'as per the present act 1978, the power of exemption is granted under section21 of the act.19. in all these decisions, this court has held that specific performance of agreement for sale cannot be enforced ..... granted, if it violates section 6 of tamil nadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1978 do not require reconsideration.we also hold that section 6 of the act not only prohibits a completed transfer but also a proposed transfer.we also hold that a decree for specific performance of ..... which we have taken.42. therefore, we answer the reference as follows:since provisions of bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act are entirely different from that of tamil nadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1978, various bench decisions of this court, wherein it was held that a decree for specific performance of contract cannot be .....

The Madras Citizens Progressive Councel Vs. the Secretary to Govt. of ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1991Mad390

..... not withdrawn.7. the government's order granting exemption is on record. the exemption order reads :--'government of tamil naduabstract. tamil nadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1978 -- madurai urban agglomeration -- excess vacant lands held by tvl. srce meenakshi mills, madurai --application for exemption under section 21(1)(a) -- orders passed. revenue department ..... by the writ petition. what then is the scope of a proceeding of this kind?5. the tamil nadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1978 fixed a ceiling on vacant land and envisaged a procedure of filing statement by the person holding vacant land in excess of the ceiling limit, preparation ..... that the 4th respondent has been holding land in excess of the ceiling area prescribed underthe tamil nadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as the act) and the 1st and 2nd respondents have not discharged their legal obligation of such excess land. the petitioner has stated that the .....

C.Govindaraj and ors. Vs. the Govt. of Tamilnadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... 114/730 basbestos roof housemurugesan,s/o. kandasamy16 roofed housenallammal17 4/729 athatched housesavithiri,w/o. kandasamy30. the tamil nadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1978 was enacted to provide for the imposition of a ceiling on vacant land in urban agglomerations, for the acquisition of such land in excess of the ..... from proceeding further regarding the acquisition of petitioners' lands under the tamilnadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1978, (hereinafter referred to as 'act') and to drop all further proceedings if any initiated under the said act in respect of the petitioners' properties in survey no.135/11 and its sub-divisions of no.54 ..... to 4 from proceeding further regarding the acquisition of petitioners' lands under the tamilnadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1978 and to drop all further proceedings if any initiated under the said act in respect of the petitioners' properties in survey no.135/11 and its sub-divisions of no.54, alagapuram pudhur .....

H. and R. Johnson (India) Ltd. Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... paid on 4.3.2008. 5. mr. c. selvaraju, learned counsel for the appellant mainly contended that in terms of the provisions contained in the interest act, 1978 (act 14 of 1978), the appellant is entitled to interest payable on the subsidy amount inasmuch as the non-payment of subsidy amount after it was sanctioned will amount to retaining the ..... position as laid down by the supreme court in mafatlal industries vs. union of india, (1997) 5 s.c.c. 772. 6. section 3 of the interest act, 1978 empowers the court to allow the interest in any proceeding for the recovery of any debt or damages. the proviso to section 3 clarifies it that where the amount ..... position to restore status quo ante and also in the light of the fact that the promisees in these cases admittedly invested substantial amounts in setting up their units, acting on the assurance, both express and implied, by the government and altered their positions by commencing the production, by which status quo ante cannot be restored, there .....