Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coast guard act 1978 chapter xi judicial review of proceedings of coast guard courts Court: delhi Page 5 of about 265 results (0.122 seconds)

Outdoors Communication Vs. Pwd and Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(2)CTLJ179(Del)

..... powers conferred on the commissioner of police under section 28(1)(e) read with the proviso to sub-section 3 of section 28 of the delhi police act, 1978 and with the previous sanction of the administrator of union territory of delhi, the commissioner made the delhi control of erection or exhibition of advertising devices regulations, ..... without the prior permission of its commissioner.23. the present case is concerned with public land and public streets. the expression 'street' is defined under the delhi police act, 1978 and reads thus:section 2(r): 'street' includes any highway, bridge, way over a causeway, viaduct or arch or any road, lane, footway, square, court, ..... per capita tree average in the world in the 1970s, whose inhabitants ensured and cared for what they had in heritage. the lodi garden is preserved and guarded so zealously, just as some concerned citizens ensured that the lutyen bungalow zone in delhi maintains its bungalow status and is not overridden and overcome by the .....

Essel Sports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Board of Control for Cricket

Court : Delhi

..... brown & root (u.k.) ltd., 1981 ac 557 : (1981) 1 all er 143 : (1980) 3 wlr 991 (hl)12. macshannon vs- rockware glass ltd., (1978) 1 all er 625 : 1978 ac 795 : (1978) 2 wlr 362 (hl)13. carron iron co. vs- maclaren, (1855) 5 hlc 416 : 24 lj ch 620 : 3 wr 597 (hl). we have mentioned ..... which was challenged before the bombay high court. speaking for the bench his lordship r.v. raveendran made the following pithy observations:-32. where the lower court acts arbitrarily, capriciously or perversely in the exercise of its discretion, the appellate court will interfere. exercise of discretion by granting a temporary injunction when there is no ..... .5 represents india;(iii) pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining/ prohibiting defendant no.5, its assigns, office bearers employees, agents, successors or any other entity acting in the name and/or on its behalf from intimidating, threatening in any manner whatsoever, inducing or inciting or in any other manner interfering with the attempts of .....

Federation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of India and Others V ...

Court : Delhi

..... in delhi, the court proposes to examine the relevant legislation applicable in the national capital territory of delhi. 66. under section 2 (i) of the delhi tax luxuries act, 1996 ('dtl act'), the expression "luxury provided in a hotel" is defined to mean "accommodation and other services provided in a hotel, the rate or charges for which including the charges ..... , a new problem has arisen as a result of the decision of the supreme court in northern india caterers (india) ltd. v. lt. governor of delhi (air 1978 sc 1591). states have been proceeding on the basis that the associated hotels of india case was applicable only to supply of food or drink by a hotelier to a ..... the decisions in state of himachal pradesh v. associated hotels of india ltd. (1972) 1 scc 472 and northern india caterers (india) ltd. v. lt. governor of delhi (1978) 4 scc 36 mr. venkataraman submitted that in both the aforementioned decisions the supply of food and drinks in a hotel was viewed by the supreme court to be a .....

Jindal Exports Ltd. Vs. Fuerst Day Lawson

Court : Delhi

..... to foreign awards under the new york convention) and part ii of chapter ii (pertaining to foreign awards under the geneva convention) of the arbitration and conciliation act, while limiting the right of appeal in respect of domestic awards. surely, this was not and cannot be considered the legislative intent. it is unlikely that ..... there is also nothing in the expression 'authorised by law to hear appeals from original decrees of the court' contained in section 39(1) of the arbitration act which by implication reserves the jurisdiction under the letters patent to entertain an appeal against the order passed in arbitration proceedings. therefore, in so far as letters ..... arbitration and conciliation act is read literally, an appeal cannot be filed except in the situations mentioned therein. so, if the section is to be read literally, the controversy raised in this case would not even survive. in this context, we may cite the following passage from stock v. frank jones (tipton) ltd. [1978] 1 wlr .....

Mrs. Kailash Suneja and ors. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (1998)145CTR(Del)560

..... market value of the subject property, shall be made known to the public and shall not be kept as a guarded secret.(20) in determining fair market value of a property, regard must be had to the field realities, such ..... review and would be tested on the touchstone of art. 14 of the constitution of india. the house of lords in gold coast selection trust ltd. vs. humphrey (1949) 17 itr (supp) 19 observed :'that, valuation is an art, not an ..... 1963crilj329 .3. rustom cavasjee cooper & anr. vs. union of india : [1970]3scr530 .4. smt. maneka gandhi vs. union of india & anr. : [1978]2scr621 .5. state of himachal pradesh & anr. vs. umed ram sharma & ors. : [1986]1scr251 .6. supreme court legal aid committee representing undertrial prisoners vs ..... and are not influenced by any extraneous considerations. exception, however, is made only under s. 269ud of the it act where such transactions are made between the relatives on account of natural love and affection'.the appropriate authority had completely .....

1. Mrs. Kailash Suneja (C.W. No. 5220 of 1993 and C.M. No. 1988 of 199 ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1998]231ITR318(Delhi); [1998]97TAXMAN144(Delhi)

..... the fair market value of the subject property, shall be made known to the public and shall not be kept a guarded secret.(20) in determining the fair market value of a property, regard must be had to the field realities, such ..... review and would be tested on the touchstone of article 14 of the constitution of india. the house of lords in gold coast selection trust ltd v. humphrey, [1949] 17 itr (supp.) 19 observed :'... valuation is an art, not an exact ..... state of madras : 1950crilj1383 .2. p. vajravelu mudaliar v. special deputy collector for land acquisition : [1965]1scr614 .3. cwt v. laxmipat singhania : [1978]111itr272(all) .4. cwt v. smt. taraben r. patel : [1992]198itr657(kar) .5. jaswant rai v. cwt .6. cit v. smt. vimlaben ..... are not influenced by any extraneous considerations. exception, however, is made only under section 269ud of the income-tax act where such transactions are made between the relatives on account of natural love and affection.'the appropriate authority had completely .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Continental Construction Co. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1986]15ITD753(Delhi)

..... (p.) ltd. (supra). the commissioner (appeals) found that the question had been considered by the special bench in respect of the assessment years 1977-78 and 1978-79 and in the light of the discussion in that order the commissioner (appeals) directed the assessing officer to follow the observations of the special bench of the tribunal ..... erred in not allowing the claim of the assessed for a deduction of rs. 89,16,19,198 made under section 80-o of the income-tax act, 1961 (the act). we proceed to deal with this ground first.2. the assessed is a civil construction company and according to the details furnished by it, it has execution ..... execution of some foreign projects undertaken by the diwaniyah project as far as the assessed was concerned, was only a civil buildings contract and the assessed had to act according to the specification and details furnished by the baghdad authorities. similarly, according to him, was the position regarding the diwaniyah sewerage project. the iac was of .....

Viniyoga International and Another Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1985(20)ELT23(Del)

..... on the application of the principle that any procedure must be 'right just and fair', as enunciated by the supreme court in the case of maneka gandhi : [1978]2scr621 . the complainant has not challenged the order and has apparently reconciled to the right of the accused to be furnished with copies when the witness is produced ..... cognizable offences have been investigated into by the central bureau of investigation, under the code, along with an offence u/s 5 of the imports and exports control act, 1947, which though cognizable is nevertheless an offence of which cognizance cannot be taken by the court except on a complaint by a specified authority, where number ..... a competent authority. decision of the calcutta high court, as indeed the supreme court turned on the construction of the provisions of section 14 of the official secrets act, which provides that the proceedings may be held in 'camera' and the question was whether the provisions of section 14 in any way deprived the 'valuable rights .....

H.S. Pannu Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(99)DRJ366

..... contained in section 438 must be saved, not jettisoned. no doubt can linger after the decision in maneka gandhi maneka gandhi v. union of india : [1978]2scr621 that in order to meet the challenge of article 21 of the constitution, the procedure established by law for depriving a person of his liberty must ..... applications on 27-4-2007, without considering them on merits and proceeding to issue non-bailable warrants and later, directing proceedings under sections 82/83, he acted most injudiciously. such an approach is deplorable; it can undermine public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial process. in these circumstances, the petition is allowed ..... empowered to try them summarily. yet parliament, which had circumscribed judicial discretion by enacting conditions in other instances, studiously kept out any such provision under the act. the supreme court has, in a decision reported as maulavi hussein haji abraham umarji v. state of gujarat : 2004crilj3860 , held that there should be no .....

Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi387

..... methodology. where however, the legislature intends to make elaborate provision for shearing, such provisions are incorporated in the statute itself so as to make them statutory safe-guards. such provisions are to be found in statute like the code of criminal procedure. where, however, 'the legislature does not want any judicial interference of rules ..... otherwise put the rights, interests, freedoms and liberties of the individuals in jeopardy. the audi alteram partem rule is part of the judicial and legislative methodology to guard against such jeopardy and ensure that justice is done, or to put it differently, miscarriage of justice is prevented. it is for this reason that any ..... held that a prior hearing need not be given to persons affected before passing an order under section 18aa of the act might require reconsideration and the hearing bench by its order of 12th october, 1978, thereforee, referred the question of law to a larger bench. this bench on the opening day of its hearing .....