Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2008(4)ALD445; 2008(4)ALT287
..... it clear that before taking the action, an opinion of the advocate general of the state of bihar was sought by the respondent. referring to the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the advocate general opined that such amount could be claimed by the state government from the appellant company. reference was made to sections 6 and 7 of the said ..... appellant company the certificate proceedings could not have been initiated under the bihar and orissa public demands recovery act, 1914, in view of the provisions of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957, the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and also the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. but it also cannot be overlooked that the action has been taken under the bihar and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : (2009)20VST405(AP)
..... it clear that before taking the action, an opinion of the advocate-general of the state of bihar was sought by the respondent. referring to the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the advocate-general opined that such amount could be claimed by the state government from the appellant-company. reference was made to sections 6 and 7 of the said ..... appellant-company the certificate proceedings could not have been initiated under the bihar and orissa public demands recovery act, 1914, in view of the provisions of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957, the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and also the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. but it also cannot be overlooked that the action has been taken under the bihar and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1998(3)ALD731; 1998(3)ALT785
..... at paragraph 15 in m/s. rohtas industries ltd v. chairman, b.s.e.b., : [1984]3scr59 are also relied upon. the provisions of the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 and colliery control order are referred to by some of the learned counsel to say that though the respondent is a company doing ..... substantiate that different prices can be charged from different customers. it is also submitted that as far as scl is concerned, nearly 50% of the coal is being obtained from underground mining and moreover the cost of production in open cast mines is higher singareni collieries due to higher over-burden. no comparison can therefore be made with ..... coal india limited where 77% of the production comes from mechanised open cast mines.7. without endorsing the extreme contentions advanced by the learned counsel for respondents that the respondent-company, just as any other business-house has absolute .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2002(1)ALD408; 2002(1)ALT241
..... court e.g. income-tax appellate tribunal, railway claims tribunal, l.i.c., tribunal, tribunal under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 tribunal under waste lands (claims) act, drugs act and companies act. in relation to constitution of various tribunals, qualifications of the members or the presiding officer had been prescribed statutorily. ..... for condonation of delays in such institution vis-a-vis the statutory silence in section 22; (f) whether the provisions of the limitation act enacted pursuant to the legislative field enumerated in the concurrent list (entry 13) is applicable to a tribunal constituted under the special constitutional ..... been constitutedfor the purpose of adjudicating disputes in respect of matters relating to state public service of government of andhra pradesh. the said act provides for a supplemental forum for resolution of service disputes.19. constitution of tribunals by itself cannot be questioned on the ground of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(2)ALD726
..... it clear that before taking the action, an opinion of the advocate general of the state of bihar was sought by the respondent. referring to the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the advocate general opined that such amount could be claimed by the state government from the appellant company. reference was made to sections 6 and 7 of the said ..... appellant company the certificate proceedings could not have been initiated under the bihar and orissa public demands recovery act, 1914, in view of the provisions of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957, the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and also the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. but it also cannot be overlooked that the action has been taken under the bihar and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1999(1)ALD28; 1998(6)ALT318
..... to impose the property tax on lands and buildings is therefore not in conflict with the power conferred by the coal mines nationalisation act in the union government to regulate and develop the coal mines nationalisation act in the union government to regulate and develop the coal mines so as to ensure rational and scientific utilisation of coal resources. the paramount purpose behind the declaration contained in section 2 of the ..... passed on to the parliament by virtue of entry 54, list i, that the parliament enacted the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 for acquisition of coal mines with a view to reorganising and reconstructing such coal mines so as to ensure the rational, co-ordinated and scientific development and utilisation of coal resources as best to subserve the common good; that the taxing power of the state legislature must .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1995(3)ALT228
..... article 14. the central government claimed protection of article 31-c of the constitution of india. the question that arose for consideration of the supreme court, was whether the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 was entitled to the protection of article 31-c of the constitution. we may note here that the protection of article 31-c was claimed on the ground that ..... it stood prior to amendment of the said provision by the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976, got restored.14. in sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. bharat coking coal ltd. (3 supra), writs were filed in calcutta high court questioning the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 pursuant to which the coal mines and coke oven plants belonging to the petitioner, were nationalized. the cases were withdrawn to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2009(5)ALT200
..... rights of the petitioner are not affected. in the state of a.p., in fact, number of coal mine leaseholds are held by private entrepreneurs which were nationalized by bringing out nationalisation of coal mine act. the writ petition is quite premature since the application is not yet disposed of and when the ..... statutory authority is in the process of exercising its right, the petitioner is interfering in discharging the statutory duty by the statutory authority and the present writ petition is misconceived. as explained earlier, mining ..... convenience. the learned government pleader for industries also had taken this court through section 11 of the a.p. mines & minerals (development & regulation) act, 1957, in short referred to as 'act' for the purpose of convenience. the learned government pleader for industries would maintain that the second application was taken .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2004(3)ALD858; 2004(4)ALT286
..... under section 3, of the bihar land reforms act; and (2) whether the suit land is 'mine' within the meaning of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973? the appellant contended that there is no proper pleading for determination whether the suit land is a mine within the meaning of coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. it is appropriate to extract the paragraphs ..... jagjit kaur, : air1996sc855 , the supreme court held that' ......if the property is given to a female hindu towards her maintenance after the commencement of the act, she becomes the absolute owner thereof the moment she is placed in possession of the said property (unless, of course, she is already in possession) notwithstanding ..... enacted in sub-section (1), since in most of such cases, where property is allotted to the hindu female prior to the enactment of the act, there would be a provision, in consonance with the old sastric law then prevailing, prescribing limited interest in the property and where property is given .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1993(1)ALT439
..... . in new satgram engg. v. union of india (6 supra), the question in dispute was whether a workship or director's bungalow were not 'mine' as defined under the coal mines (nationalisation) act. the supreme court having observed that the question in such cases will always be whether the workshop is located in or adjacent to a ..... mine and was used substantially for the purpose of the mine under the same management, held that these are essentially questions of fact to be determined according to the ..... is barred by limitation.19. the supreme court held in state of madhya pradesh v. bhailal bhai, : [1964]6scr261 . that the provisions of the limitation act do not as such apply to the granting of relief under article 226 andthathowever,themaximum period fixed by the legislature as the time within which the relief by a .....
Tag this Judgment!