Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 preamble 1 coal mines nationalisation act 1973 Court: delhi Page 10 of about 905 results (0.143 seconds)

Sep 01 2011 (HC)

Union of India and anr. Vs. Central Colleries Company and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... with various legal requirement." 4. screening committee was an inhouse mechanism set up by the central government to identify coal blocks which can be allotted. coal mines were nationalized with enactment of coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 (cmna). the said act allows private sector indian companies engaged in the specified industrial activity to carry on coal mining for their end use in accordance with section 3(iii) of the said ..... act. 5. by a letter dated 2nd september, 1999, ministry of coal, government of india had approved the mining plan submitted by respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1976 (HC)

Bhagat Raja of Bombay Vs. Union of India Etc.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1976Delhi583; 1976RLR158

..... his representations, comments and counter-comments. judicial decisions have consistently held that there is no right to a personal hearing : see the case of the commissioner of coal mines provident fund dhanbad and other (supra), rangnath v. daulatrao and ors., : [1975]3scr99 and madhya pradesh bachawat j.(38) that rules of natural justice govern ..... preference to m/s. tiffins barytes asbestos and paints ltd. for grant of mineral concession over the area under section 11(3) of the mines and minerals (r&d;) act, 1957, the central government have no valid ground for interfering with the decision of the government of andhra pradesh and they hereby reject your ..... was before the state government but comments and counter comments which the parties made regarding the order of the state government.(47) did the central government act unfairly in this case the counsel referred me to many decisions. but ultimately i consider that the decision depends upon whether in the particular circumstances of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 1982 (HC)

Lachhman Dass and ors. Vs. Suraj Prakash Mahajan

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi380; 21(1982)DLT277

..... before which the tenant would deliver possession to the landlord so as to enable the landlord to commence the work of 'repairs' as contemplated by section 20 of the act. (59) mr. narula, learned counsel for the 'respondent- landlord, submitted that mr. bahri's tribunal, while accepting his appeal on the aforesaid ground, had granted ..... those cases, the courts have taken into account the subsequent events or sub sequent developments. (47) we are here concerned with a case of subsequent unilateral act of the tenant. can that demolish of take away the cause of action which has once accrued to the landlord? this question has arisen in several cases ..... bye-laws of the municipal corporation of delhi without any formal sanction from it as it is covered by the phrase 'repairs' for the purposes of delhi municipal corporation act'. (8) in the said annexure, the premises were described as 'old anachronism existing in the building of the petitioner (landlord) which stands reconstructed'. (9) admittedly, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1984 (HC)

Dharam Dev Malik Vs. Raj Rani

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1984Delhi389; 1984(7)DRJ19

..... face to come back to her matrimonial home of her own accord. it was, thereforee, for the appellant to have expressed contrition and made complete atonement for his highly wrongful act. (15) unfortunately for the appellant i have looked in vain for any evidence of expiation on his part for this grave wrong to the respondent. (16) in the ..... appellant. as said by the supreme court in bipinchandra jaisinghbai shah (supra) that:- 'if in fact, there has been a separation, the essential question always is whether that act could be attributable to an animus deserendi the offence of desertion commences when the fact of separation and the animus deserendi co-exist. but it is not necessary that they ..... noticed at this stage is that an order was made in the said case granting maintenance pendente lite to the respondent under section 24 of the hindu marriage act (for short the act). the appellant went in appeal against the said order being f.a.o. no. 64/75 but the same was dismissed by the high court of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2018 (HC)

Manoj Kumar & Anr vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... and amit. thereafter, accused pankaj was arrested and supplementary charge sheet was filed against him. charges under section 147/148/149/324/452/307/302 ipc and 27/arms act were framed to which the accused persons pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. to prove its case, the prosecution had examined 30 7. witnesses, dharmender sharma (pw1), ..... the stabbing of her father on the basis of information derived contemporaneously from her brother pw1. therefore, by virtue of section 6, 7 and 8 of the evidence act, her statement is relevant regarding the statement of pw3, to the effect that she heard the accused saying that they would finish the deceased that day, mr. katyal ..... all the appellants under 105. section 148, 324 and 452 ipc is upheld. conviction of the appellants raj kumar @ raja and pankaj under section 27 of the arms act is also upheld. the appellants are acquitted for 106. the offence under section 302 ipc. however, the appellant raj kumar @ raja is convicted under section 304 part-ii .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2001 (HC)

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Smt. Veeran Wali

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2001]250ITR71(Delhi)

..... far as the case is concerned. they read as follows :'5. levy of estate duty. (1) in the case of every person dying after the commencement of this act, there shall, save as hereinafter expressly pro vided, be levied and paid upon the principal value ascertained as herein after provided of all property, settled or not settled, including ..... agricultural land situate in the territories which immediately before the 1-11-1956, were comprised in the states specified in the first schedule to this act, and in the union territories of dadra and nagar haveli, goa, daman and diu, and pondicherry, which passes on the death of such person, a duty called ..... the official gazette, add the names of any other state to the first schedule in respect whereof resolutions have been passed by the legislatures of those states adopting this act under clause (1) of article 252 of the constitution in respect of estate duty on agricultural lands situate in those states, and on the issue of any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2015 (HC)

Jindal Steel and Power Limited and Others Vs. Union of India and Anot ...

Court : Delhi

..... arbitrary and illegal, being violative of article 14 of the constitution of india as also contrary to section 3(1)(a) of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. dr singhvi further submitted that the supreme court was not concerned with how and in what manner the coal resources would be disposed of after the cancellation order. according to dr singhvi, there were several eventualities. the ..... other company incorporated in india, allotted a schedule i coal mine shall be granted a prospecting licence or a mining lease, as applicable, by the concerned state government in accordance with the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957. (10) in relation to schedule ii coal mines, the successful bidder which was a prior allottee, shall continue coal mining operations after the appointed date in terms of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2015 (HC)

Jindal Steel and Power Limited and Another Vs. Union of India and Oth ...

Court : Delhi

..... arbitrary and illegal, being violative of article 14 of the constitution of india as also contrary to section 3(1)(a) of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. dr singhvi further submitted that the supreme court was not concerned with how and in what manner the coal resources would be disposed of after the cancellation order. according to dr singhvi, there were several eventualities. the ..... other company incorporated in india, allotted a schedule i coal mine shall be granted a prospecting licence or a mining lease, as applicable, by the concerned state government in accordance with the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957. (10) in relation to schedule ii coal mines, the successful bidder which was a prior allottee, shall continue coal mining operations after the appointed date in terms of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2014 (HC)

Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private School Vs. Honble Lt.Gover ...

Court : Delhi

..... sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal limited and commented severely on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves with ..... intended an excess of jurisdiction. in sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. bharat coking coal ltd. the constitution bench speaking through chinnappa reddy, j., had observed, in the context of interpretation of the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 that the court is not concerned with the statements made in the affidavits ..... the state, as if it was filling the seats available to be filled up at its discretion in such private institutions. this would amount to nationalisation of seats which has been specifically disapproved in pai foundation [(2002) 8 scc481 . such imposition of quota of state seats or enforcing reservation policy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2014 (HC)

Forum for Promotion ofquality Education for All Vs. Lt. Governor of De ...

Court : Delhi

..... sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal limited and commented severely on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves with ..... intended an excess of jurisdiction. in sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. bharat coking coal ltd. the constitution bench speaking through chinnappa reddy, j., had observed, in the context of interpretation of the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 that the court is not concerned with the statements made in the affidavits ..... the state, as if it was filling the seats available to be filled up at its discretion in such private institutions. this would amount to nationalisation of seats which has been specifically disapproved in pai foundation [(2002) 8 scc481 . such imposition of quota of state seats or enforcing reservation policy .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //