Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 preamble 1 coal mines nationalisation act 1973 Court: andhra pradesh Page 6 of about 355 results (0.131 seconds)

Sep 05 2003 (HC)

Konkana Ravinder Goud and ors. Vs. Bhavanarishi Co-operative House Bui ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD654; 2003(6)ALT1

..... english equity have taken statutory form in india and have been incorporated in occasional provisions of various indian statutes such as the indian trusts act, the specific relief act, transfer of property act etc. and where a question of interpretation of such equity based statutory provisions arises we will be well justified in seeking aid from the ..... area. no corresponding enactment was applicable in the andhra area of the state. in order to bring in parity, a.p. record of rights in land act, 1971 (act no. 26 of 1971) was enacted with a view to consolidate and amend the law relating to record of rights in land in the entire state of ..... annulled, reversed, he was empowered to exercise revisional jurisdiction to modify, annul reverse or remit for reconsideration and to pass any order accordingly.69. the act was amended by act.no. 1 of 1989. section 5-a was inserted providing for regularisation of certain alienations or other transfer of lands by making application before the mandal revenue .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 2003 (HC)

Rci Power Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2004AP60; 2003(3)ALD762

..... 17th september, 1999 to regulate the telecommunication services and the matters connected therewith issued by telecom regulatory authority constituted under the telecom regulatory authority of india act (act 24 of 1997) have been impugned on various grounds including the one that the regulatory authority of india does not have any power to issue any ..... of power production and supply be it power generation, distribution, renovation and modernization or co-generation. private sector companies can set up thermal projects (coal/naphtha and other liquid fuel based), hydel projects and wind/solar energy projects of any size. these companies can set up enterprises to operate either ..... to the approval of the government. the policy permitted 100% foreign owned companies to set up power projects of any capacity and of any type (coal, gas, hydel, wind or solar) in india and repatriate profits without any export obligation. the policy also allows liberal capital structuring and an attractive return .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 1992 (HC)

Bakelite Hylam Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1994(2)ALT240; [1993]202ITR145(AP)

..... assessment. rejecting the contention of the revenue that the assessee cannot claim interest under section 214 unless payments have been made in accordance with the provisions of the act within the time provided under the law, it was observed as follows (at page 457) : 'there is no reference in section 214(1) about the ..... n. viswanatha reddy : [1991]190itr266(ap) , addressing itself to the question whether there was scope for controversy or debate in regard to the interpretation of section 214 of the act observed as follows (at page 270) : 'section 211(1) sets out the time schedule for the payment of advance tax instalments. in kangundi industrial works (p.) ltd. v ..... taking a view different from that of this court in kangundi industrial works' case : [1980]121itr339(ap) , and holding that interest under section 214 of the act had to be paid on the excess advance tax paid during the relevant financial year even though the instalments were paid within the time specified. 6. the kangundi .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1999 (HC)

P. Acharya Nagarjun Vs. State of A.P. Though Women Protection Cell, Hy ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(2)ALD535; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)634; 1999(2)ALT296; 1999CriLJ4016

..... petitioner, therefore there is no question of granting of anticipatory bail. however, in the light of the discussion above, following directions are given.(1) that, henceforth respondent no.2 shall act independently without any help from police organisation.(2) that, no summons or requests issued by respondent no.2 for appearing before it, to anybody, shall be executed by the police ..... social intervention through professional counselling in the case of (a) family dispute (out of the purview of law) (b) harassment of women (out of the purview of law) (ii) to act as a catalyst between non-governmental organisation working in the same field and law enforcement machinery i.e., police and other related departments. in para 5 he states that;'5 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2005 (HC)

Management of State Bank of India Rep. by Its Regional Manager Vs. Ind ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(1)ALT39

..... from that stage, imposition of punishment afresh by the employer and another dispute being raised by the workman, thereby defeating the very object of the industrial disputes act which is to provide for expeditious disposal of industrial disputes. as held by the supreme court, in a slightly different context, in the cooper engineering ltd. ..... copy of the enquiry report to the delinquent employee, prior to imposition of punishment by the employer, is required to be examined.20. the industrial disputes act does not prescribe any procedure either for conducting domestic enquiries or for investigating the misconduct of employees. as laid down in woodbriar and sussex estates v. ..... in the services of the workman being terminated;(6) the power conferred on the industrial tribunals/labour courts, under section 11-a of the industrial disputes act, is akin to that of an appellate authority;(7) in cases where section 11-a applies, labour courts/tribunals are empowered to re-appreciate the material .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1992 (HC)

K. Gajendra Naidu Vs. State of A.P. Represented by Inspector of Police ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1992(3)ALT27; 1993(1)ALT(Cri)290

Bhaskar Rao, J.1. This matter has come up before us on a reference made by our learned brother, Parvatha Rao, J. The question involved in this reference is, whether a second application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail is maintainable in the background of the fact that an earlier application for the relief is dismissed. In M. Rama Rao v. State, 1992 (2) APLJ 366., a learned Judge of this Court took the view that a second application under Section 438 Cr.P.C, is not maintainable. Unable to agree with that view, Justice Parvatha Rao referred the matter for decision of a Division Bench.2. Criminal Procedure Code of the year 1898 i.e., the Code earlier to the present one, did not have a provision corresponding to Section 438 of the present Code. At that time there was difference of opinion ;amongst various High Courts as to whether the Courts had inherent jurisdiction to release a petitioner on bail in anticipation of his arrest. For the first time, the Law Commissi...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2008 (HC)

Ghanta Infrastructures Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Provisio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(2)ALT611

..... authority or function in an arbitrary fashion. the following illustrate the duties and functions of public nature and public character contemplated by the security act, securitisation companies and reconstruction companies:(i) efficient and focused recovery of public monies to reduce non-performing assets of publicly held banks and ..... in an arbitrary and unreasonable or opaque manner. further, the duties, functions and responsibilities of public nature and public character contemplated by the act for securitisation companies and reconstruction companies had been enumerated as hereunder:a) efficient and focused recovery of public monies to reduce non-performing assets ..... to the economy and to the health of banking/finance. the authority and functions prescribed for securitisation companies and reconstruction companies under the act are totally controlled and directed by the reserve bank of india. in fact, securitisation companies and reconstruction companies are prohibited from engaging in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 2003 (HC)

Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Port, Visakhapatnam Port Trus ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD562; 2004(1)ALT195; 2004(1)ARBLR319(AP)

..... from the party concerned is irrelevant for determining the question of limitation for filing objections under article 119(b) of the limitation act, 1963.' in bharat coking coal limited v. c.k. ahuja and anr., (1995) supp. (1) scc 774; the apex court at paras 4 ..... april, 1994. even in the petition of objection filed before this court, no objection has been taken by m/s. bharat coking coal ltd. that the award should not have been filed before this court. accordingly, such contention should not be allowed to be raised at ..... 9-12 of 1994 in civil nos. 3882-85 of 1990. at the hearing of the said applications, learned counsel appearing for m/s bharat coking coal ltd. has contended that as the ..... and 6 observed :'the said applications under sections 14(2), 17 and 29 of the indian arbitration act have been numbered as ias nos. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2002 (HC)

Bandi Pandu Vs. Kola Balaji Varma and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(2)ALT(Cri)417; II(2003)BC93

..... was filed on 11.11.1994 before the judicial first class magistrate, avanigadda, alleging that the petitioner committed an offence under section 138 of thenegotiable instruments act (for short 'n.i. act') and section 420, ipc. the same was forwarded under section 156(3), cr.p.c to the police station, avanigadda for investigation and report. ..... whether dishonour of the cheque on each occasion of its presentation gives rise to a fresh cause of action within the meaning of section 14(b) of the act. section 142 reads as under :cognizance of offences--notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973,-- (a) no court shall take cognizance of any ..... to do with the taking cognizance, though taking cognizance is an essential step to be taken by the magistrate before either issuing summons, postponing to issue summons or acting under section 203 in dismissing the complaint. the position in law in that behalf is completely settled. we, therefore, do not agree with raman, j., .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 2002 (HC)

B. Balraj Goud Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD599; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)98

..... do not assign any reasons for cancellation. 16. both the cases are misplaced to the facts of the present case. section 17(3)(c) of the act authorises the licensing authority for cancellation of licence which was obtained by suppression of material information or on basis of wrong information provided by the holder of the ..... after the expiry of the prescribed time, without waiting further report. subsection (3) provides about grant of licence type of the weapon etc. section 14 of the act authorises the licensing authority to refuse the licence. sub-section (3) of section 14 contemplates recording of reasons for such refusal and furnish the same to the person on ..... of any false or wrong information in the application form in violation of rule 51-a will render the applicant liable for punishment under section 30 of the arms act, 1959. rule 51(a) reads as under: the applicant shall not suppress any factual information or furnish any false or wrong information in the application form. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //