Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: us supreme court Year: 1979 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.079 seconds)

Jul 02 1979 (FN)

Gannett Co., Inc. Vs. Depasquale

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jul-02-1979

..... was necessary to effectuate congress' determination page 443 u. s. 440 that the confidentiality of communications intercepted under title iii of the omnibus crime control and safe streets act of 1968, 18 u.s.c. 2510 et seq., be preserved prior to the determination that such communications were lawfully intercepted. united states v. cianfrani, 573 f ..... the sources upon which the court relies do not concern suppression hearings. they concern hearings to determine probable cause to bind a defendant over for trial. e.g., indictable offences act, 11 & 12 vict., ch. 42, 17, 19 (1848); cal.penal code ann. 868 (west supp. 1979). such proceedings are not critical to the criminal ..... special status of members of the press as such, but rather page 443 u. s. 398 because, "[i]n seeking out the news, the press . . . acts as an agent of the public at large," each individual member of which cannot obtain for himself "the information needed for the intelligent discharge of his political responsibilities." id. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1979 (SC)

Bachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-04-1979

Reported in : (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;

..... death penalty but, with the greatest respect to them and in all humility, i cannot persuade myself to concur with the view taken by them. mine is unfortunately a solitary dissent and it is therefore, with a certain amount of hesitation that i speak but my initial diffidence is overcome by my ..... highly controversial area of death penalty, with all its complexity, vast implications and manifold ramifications, even all the judges sitting cloistered in this court and acting unanimously, cannot assume the role which properly belongs to the chosen representatives of the people in parliament, particularly when judges have no divining rod to divine ..... planning for fair-play of judicial discretion to take care of the variable, unpredictable circumstances of the individual cases, relevant to individualised sentencing. when judges, acting individually or collectively, in their benign anxiety to do what they think is morally good for the people, take upon themselves, the responsibility of setting down .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //