Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 36 results (0.092 seconds)

Sep 11 2013 (HC)

Lalit Shanker Vs. Smt,sunder Bai

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... bench of two judges; and (c) a judge before whom any proceedings under the indian trusts act, 1882 (act no. ii of 1882), the companies act, 1956 (act no. i of 1956), the designs act, 1911 (act no. ii of 1911) or the patents act, 1970 (act no. 39 of 1970) is pending, may with the sanction of the chief justice, obtain ..... to such area, have or exercise any jurisdiction or power under chapter ix of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974); . chapter iv of the act of 1984 provides for the procedure in relation to the proceedings before the family court. section 10 thereof, being again relevant, is reproduced hereunder for ready reference:- 10 ..... applicable statutory provisions a comprehension of the relevant provisions makes out that for the purpose of exercising the jurisdiction and powers conferred on a family court by the act of 1984, the state government, after consultation with the high court and by a notification, is required to establish in the city or town with population exceeding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2010 (HC)

Rakesh Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2010(2)Raj1847

..... for taking complainant's evidence by affidavit has been given, then any provision contrary in the code of criminal procedure cannot override section 145 of the n.i. act. the stage of enquiry is pre-summoning stage. the word 'inquiry' has been defined under the code of criminal procedure, which is reproduced hereunder for ready ..... submissions of the parties and perused the record carefully.10. the two questions framed are otherwise interlinked, thus are taken together for its answers. the negotiable instruments act was amended with certain objects and has been elaborately discussed by the hon'ble apex court in the case of mandvi co-op bank ltd. (supra). ..... before issue of process, complainant and his witness(s) can be examined on affidavit.8. learned counsel for non-petitioner further contended that the negotiable instruments act being special legislation has overriding effect over the general law being the code of criminal procedure, thus general law should give way to the special law. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 02 2000 (HC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Heera Lal and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2000(3)WLC56; 2001(2)WLN79

..... the investigating officers in the case, in other words, if the court is convinced that the testimony of a witness to the occurrence is true the court is free to act on it albeit investigating officer's suspicious role in the case.'(25). the fact remains that by the testimony of kesar and barji, it is fully established that both the ..... , or if the court uses them for the purpose of contradicting such police officer, the provisions of section 161 or section 145 as the case may, of the indian evidence act, 1872 (1 of 1872), shall apply.'sub-section (2) is clear that a criminal court may use the diary not as a evidence but to aid it in a trial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 2000 (HC)

Bajrang Lal Laxmi NaraIn Dadli Deedwana Regd. Partnership Firm Vs. Jee ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN319

..... to take appropriate action under section 340 of the criminal procedure code, 1973, by making an order for filing a complaint against the persons who have, by their acts, omissions and commissions, left no stone unturned to mislead this court and pervert the course of justice by making false statements and forging the judicial record during ..... filed in the office, the stamp reporter shall compute limitation of the instant appeal in accordance with law as envisaged under section 12 of the indian limitation act. the registrar general was also directed by the aforesaid order, to issue a circular to all subordinate courts, to each district judgeship and outline courts, apprising ..... of presiding officer of first appellate court hence delay of 701 days reported by the office deserves to be condoned under section 5 of the indian limitation act.33. i have given my most anxious consideration to the contentions raised at the bar. carefully perused all the materials available on the record, including fact .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2000 (HC)

Avas Vikas Sansthan Engineering Association and ors. Vs. Avas Vikas Sa ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2000(4)WLC647; 2007(3)WLN226

..... of the element of the public interest;(e) the effect on parties who may be affected.30. calcutta high court in m.a.m.c. employees v. mining & allied machinery (1991 (3) slr 766 observed that if a government company is incorporated at least partly for the purpose of doing project work then the uncertainty ..... the purpose:government consent. provided that whenever any government is a member of or a contributor to, or otherwise interested in, any society registered under this act, such society shall not be dissolved without the consent of the government of the state of registration.12. now i proceed to examine the letter dated march ..... the writ petition on behalf of the employees is not maintainable. the petitioners have an efficacious alternative remedy available under section 76 of the rajasthan cooperative societies act. the writ petitions involve disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this court in its extra ordinary jurisdiction. service conditions of the petitioners .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2000 (HC)

Raman Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2001CriLJ800; 2001(2)WLC632; 2000(3)WLN39

..... meaning, however, in popular sense, it simply means honestly, without fraud, collusion or deceit, really, actually, without pretence and without intent to assist or act in furtherance of a fraudulent or otherwise unlawful scheme. the quality and quantity of honesty requisite for constituting good faith is conditioned by the context and object of ..... police under chapter xiv of cr.p.c. were not available in respect of offences triable under the west bengal criminal law amendment (special courts) act, 1949 and hence the investigation was without jurisdiction. the hon'ble supreme court reversed the said judgment observing as under:'the powers of investigation into ..... been contended that clauses 5 and 6 are relevant for our purpose, which speak about absurdity, express legal bar in the code or the concerned act either against the institution or continuation of proceedings or providing efficacious redressal. it has been submitted that though after the incident, there had been agitations and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1998 (HC)

Superintending Engg. Zhakam Project Vs. Ramesh Chandra and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1998(3)WLC423; 1998(1)WLN334

..... it can be recovered under section 33c(1) and other statue will not operate for the over-riding character of this act as provided under the provisions of section 25j.12. in chief mining engineer, east india coal company ltd. v. rameshwar : (1968)illj6sc , the court held that proceedings under section 33c(2) are analogous to ..... application under section 33c(2) claiming back wages. the court held that without challenging the subsequent discharge and its adjudication in a reference under section 10 of the act, the cannot claim back wages for the period beyond the unchallenged order of termination.21. similarly, the apex court, in fabriel gasusa v. labour commissioner and ors ..... , government live-stock farm, hissar v. ramesh kumar, : (1997)11scc363 , the court held that the remedy under section 33c(2) of the i.d., act is available only when there is no dispute about entitlement of the workman. the provisions cannot be invoked in case where the entitlement itself is in dispute. in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1996 (HC)

The State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Swaroop Ram

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1996(2)WLC624; 1996(1)WLN259

..... : [1961]1scr642 (ibid), the supreme court held that the very fact that the minister concerned presided over the sub-committee constituted to implement the scheme of nationalisation of bus services by itself was not sufficient to establish that he was actuated by personal bias so as to disqualify him from hearing objections under chapter-iv ..... the impugned show cause notices 'is still there, the matter should in the fitness of things be adjudicated upon under section 32 of the rajasthan cooperative societies act, 1965 by the registrar of the cooperative societies at jaipur, as directed by the learned single judge.21. the special appeal stands disposed of accordingly and ..... wrong on the part of the present joint registrar taking the decision by way of adjudicatory process within the meaning of section 32 of the rajasthan cooperative societies act, 1965, pursuant to the impugned show cause notices. to that extent, however, the judgment of the learned single judge stands modified.20. we are given .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 1994 (HC)

Dr. (Smt.) Shipra Vs. Shri Shanti Lal

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1995Raj50

..... of commission of corrupt practices in elections by shri shanti lal.2. a notification under section 15(2) of the representation of the people act, 1951 (for short, 'the act') was issued by the election commission calling upon the various constituencies to elect members for the rajasthan legislative assembly including the rajsamand assembly constituency no ..... . 1, which was reserved for scheduled caste. as per the programme, issued by the election commission under section 30 of the act, october 19, 1993 was the last date fixed for filing the nomination. 20th october, 1993 was the date for scrutiny of the nominations, 22nd october, ..... (smt.) shipra is not the member of the scheduled caste and, secondly, that she has not filed the necessary declaration under section 33(2) of the act specifying the particular caste to which she belongs. the nominations of other fourteen candidates were found in order and they were accepted by the returning officer. after .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 1994 (HC)

Rajasthan State R.T.C. Jaipur Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1(1994)ACC532

..... adarsh travel bus service and anr. v. state of uttar pradesh and ors.: : air1986sc319 considered the entire aspect in relation of a nationalised route under chapter iv-a of the old act and held that where the route covered by the scheme over-laps any route, no permit to private operators could be granted. it was ..... true that temporary permits are granted on special occasions of fairs and religious gatherings. if such situation arises in relation to a nationalised route or a portion thereof section 101 of the act provides operation of additional services by state transport undertaking. section 101 reads as under:101.-operation of additional services by the state ..... year 1991 and that there is reciprocal arrangement for issuance of temporary permits under section 87(a) of the act to the private operators. it was also submitted that exclusion or prohibition on a nationalised route to ply transport services by a private operator should not apply on transport vehicles to be used temporarily under .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //