Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-20-1979
Reported in : AIR1980Bom168
..... , guaranteed the payment of the amounts due under the hire purchase agreements. the 3rd defendant is the manager appointed under the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. the 4th defendants-the coal india limited is incorporated under the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, and its previous name was the coal mines authority limited.2. according to the plaintiffs, by three separate and identical hire purchase agreements in writing all dated 30th march ..... vested in the central government with effect from 31st january 1973. again, by the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 (no. 26 of 1973), the coal mines including the coal mines of defendant no. 1 were nationalised from 1st may 1973. this defendant refers to several provisions of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as 'the said act').7. according to this defendant, at all material times, the suit vehicles were in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Sep-04-1979
Reported in : [1979(39)FLR329]; (1980)ILLJ336Bom; 1979MhLJ874
..... and omission on the part of the workman but the concept that the termination of the surplus workers' service is due to reasons such as economy, nationalisation in industry, installation or improvement of new labour-saving machinery or device, standardisation or improvement of plant or technique and the like. it is in ..... however, came to the conclusion that the termination of the petitioner's service amounted to retrenchment attracting the provisions of s. 25f of the industrial disputes act, and that the bank not having complied with the mandatory provisions of that section, the order of termination could not be sustained. the tribunal concluded by ..... by the bank to that letter. 6. being aggrieved by the termination order, the petitioner raised an industrial dispute under s. 2a of the industrial disputes act before the conciliation authority. nothing came of the same, except a failure report. two references were summarily rejected by the tribunal for technical reasons on preliminary .....
Tag this Judgment!