Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-09-2015
..... question was determined by the learned single judge having regard to the provisions of the code of criminal procedure code, 1973 and the provisions of the prevention of corruption act, 1988. in the circumstances, this court had held that the writ appeal was maintainable against the order of the learned single judge. we notice from the ..... writ appeals were allowed vacating the interim order of stay of issuance of summons to the accused in proceedings initiated under the provisions of the prevention of corruption act, 1988. the division bench has held:- "32. ........when such a power is exercised in the teeth of the aforesaid statutory provision and the judgment of ..... judge was justified in treating and deciding the petition under section 482 cr.p.c. therefore, this writ appeal filed under section 4 of the karnataka high court act, 1961, is not maintainable. 12. before parting with this case - it is pertinent to observe that we have come across several instances where writ petitions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-09-2015
..... was justified in treating and deciding the petition under section 482 cr.p.c. therefore, this writ appeal filed under section 4 of the karnataka high court act, 1961, is not maintainable.12. before parting with this case it is pertinent to observe that we have come across several instances where writ petitions are ..... aforestated question was determined by the learned single judge having regard to the provisions of the code of criminal procedure code, 1973 and the provisions of the prevention of corruption act, 1988. in the circumstances, this 50 court had held that the writ appeal was maintainable against the order of the learned single judge. we notice from ..... correcting their mere errors. the court said that it was, therefore, a case which called for an interference by the court of the judicial commissioner and it acted quite properly in doing so.24. in babhutmal raichand oswal v. laxmibai r. tarta, air1975sc1297 this court again reaffirmed that the power of superintendence of high court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jul-17-2015
..... . the petitioners and others like the petitioners are indulging in the illegal trade and that too indiscriminately and this court deems it to be it's duty and to act as a deterrent to such people, who entertain such similar thoughts and actions. 22. it is seen that the petitioners are indulging in destruction of invaluable natural wealth, ..... , the contraband/red sanders wood has been declared as an endangered species and it has been directed to be included in the schedule to the wild life protection act, 1972 and by its detailed order has been pleased to direct the union government to enact law to include red sandalwood as a specified plant within the meaning ..... as per the declaration of the hon'ble apex court, the respondents have jurisdiction to prosecute for the illegal transportation of the endangered species under the wild life protection act. 6. it is submitted that the hon'ble apex court in its judgment dated 13.02.2012 reported in (2012) 4 supreme court cases 362 has classified and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Jul-17-2015
..... the petitioners and others like the petitioners are indulging in the illegal trade and that too indiscriminately and this court deems it to be it s duty and to act as a deterrent to such people, who entertain such similar thoughts and actions.22. it is seen that the petitioners are indulging in destruction of invaluable natural wealth, ..... species as per the declaration of the hon ble apex court, the respondents have jurisdiction to prosecute for the illegal transportation of the endangered species under the wild life protection act.6. it is submitted that the hon ble apex court in its judgment dated 13.02.2012 reported in (2012) 4 supreme - 7 - court cases 362 has ..... petitioners on bail in crime no.07/2015, registered by nippani town p.s., for the offences punishable under sections379 411 of ipc & section86 87 of k.f. act.-. 3 - these petitions having been heard and reserved for orders and coming on for pronouncement of orders this day, the court made the following: order the petitioners in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-18-2015
..... rule prescribes a mandatory waiting period of 30 days. this may at best be characterized as a procedural irregularity, but certainly cannot be construed as an act of criminal conspiracy. this could even be attributed to the revenue officials bending over backwards to please the minister at the instance of his representatives who may ..... any crime. shri venkatesh p.dalwai, the learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1, the lokayuktha police, opposing the petitions would contend as follows: that the acts of the several accused as demonstrated, prima facie, by the material on record completely justifies the impugned order of the court below. elaborating on the same, ..... such as the khatha certificate, conversion of land user certificate, receipt for having paid betterment charges. this was in accordance with section 35 of the registration act,1908 read with rule 73 of the karnataka registration rules, 1965. the allegation is that the petitioner had registered the sale deed in violation of the .....
Tag this Judgment!