Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-20-1984
Reported in : ILR1984KAR778
..... not amount to unfair labour practice and was not intended to victimise the employee regard being had to the position settled by the decisions of this court in bengal bhatdee coal co., -v.- ram probesh singh, (air 1964 sc 486); titaghur paper mills co., ltd., -v.- rama naresh kumar (1961) 1 lab lj 511 (sc); ..... certain industrial disputes between the work-men and management were pending before the industrial tribunal, an application under section 33(2)(b) of the industrial disputes act ('the act' for short) was filed before the industrial tribunal seeking its approval for the order of dismissal passed by the management against the said shankar. as ..... again by a reference of this dispute to the adjudicator. therefore this dispute may be rejected with a suitable endorsement under section 12(5) of industrial disputes act, 1947.proforma duly filled in is enclosed.yours faithfully, sd/- k.r. shankaranarayana rao, assistant labour commissioner, bangalore division i, bangalore.'(underlined by me)(ii .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-21-1984
Reported in : ILR1984KAR1054; 1984(2)KarLJ126
..... these may have to proceed so that parties are not put to hardship or harassment given the same set of facts or confronted with similar situations can they act differently, though exercising their discretionary powers? i feel, that it is in the ends of justice desirable that this court should impress upon the trial courts dealing ..... by the court of session. the learned magistrate, who had taken cognizance of a complaint after recording the statement of the complainant on oath, had issued process acting under section 201. after the accused appeared the case was committed to the court of session. in the court of session the accused was discharged under section ..... stated above, that there was no sufficient ground for proceeding. otherwise, as already stated, if, according to him, there is sufficient ground for proceeding he may issue process acting under section 204.7. since we are considering the scope of the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 202, let me extract that entire provision :'202. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-12-1984
Reported in : ILR1984KAR205
..... extend the time to enable the parties to file objections. in other words, according to sri subba rao, this prescription of time in the landacquisition act or the act, is of no materiality at all audit is always open to the person interested to file his objections against the proposed acquisition and irrespective of whether ..... . we find no ground to accept the contentions urged by the petitioners to the contrary.6. the karnataka state legislature enacted 'the karnataka industrial areas development act, 1966' to make special provision for securing the establishment of industrial areas in the state of karnataka and generally to promote the establishment and the orderly development ..... which being satisfied that the lands should be acquired for the purpose specified in notification ann. 'a', issued a declaration under section 28(4) of the act as per ann. 'k' published in the karnataka gazette dated 1-10-1981. the second respondent thereafter served notices on the petitioners calling upon them to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-28-1984
Reported in : ILR1985KAR420
..... not have dropped the whole proceedings in exercise of the powers under sub-section (5) of section 145, this court proceeded further to consider whether the sub-divisional magistrate had acted within his powers in issuing the preliminary order, even though such a question was not raised by either of the parties. the portion of the preliminary order passed by the .....
Tag this Judgment!