Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Jul-17-2007
..... given to the accused to examine the witnesses and, hence, summary of evidence is not, legally speaking, 'evidence' as conceived under section 3 of the evidence act.27. in the case of courts of ordinary criminal jurisdiction, a person may appear or may be brought before the court on accusations of his having committed ..... importantly, though rules 22, 23 and 24 use the expression 'evidence', the word 'evidence' is not really evidence as is understood under section 3 of the evidence act and the expression 'charge', which appears in rules 22, 23 and 24, is not really a formal 'charge', which a criminal court frames. the expression 'charge', ..... , masimpur military station, requesting transfer of lakhipur police station case no. 73/2005 aforementioned to the army authorities for trial of the accused-petitioner under the army act. by order, dated 5-3-2007, aforementioned, learned chief judicial magistrate, cachar, silchar, allowed the said application and directed that the case record be handed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Sep-06-2007
..... premji associated themselves in finding prospective customers for disposing of the contraband whereby they abetted commission of the crime within the meaning of section 29 of the ndps act.in the result, we find no ground to interfere with the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence. accordingly, the impugned judgment and order is hereby affirmed ..... the accused persons were recorded. the accused persons were arrested mainly on suspicion of having committed offence punishable under section 8(c), 21 and 29 of the ndps act. as per the law laid down by the apex court in veera ibrahim v. state of maharashtra reported in : 1976crilj860 certain conditions must be fulfilled ..... taken part in procuring and trying to dispose of the contraband drugs and were accordingly convicted of the offences of abetment and criminal conspiracy under section 29 ndps act, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 10 years each with a fine of rs. 1 lac in default to undergo another one year rigorous imprisonment. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Oct-16-2007
..... and relevant justifying the discharge of a probationer, mere omission to mention the same in the order would not necessarily be fatal if taken note of and acted upon by the authority concerned. the sequence of events noticed hereinabove and the relevant facts available before the administrative committee proclaim that its resolution followed a well ..... became confirmed under the said rules, the apex court reiterated its view in sukhbans singh, surpa, and concluded that even though a probationer may have continued to act in the post to which he was appointed on probation, he could not become a permanent servant merely because of efflux of time, unless the rules of ..... on 10/9/2002, the informant had submitted a complaint before the registrar general of this court stating about the same and leveling other allegations against him as well. acting on this complaint, the registrar (i & e) of this court by his letter dated 16/ 11/2002 requested the chief judicial magistrate, tinsukia, to submit .....
Tag this Judgment!