Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: old Court: delhi Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.098 seconds)

Apr 17 2007 (HC)

Sh. Deep Chand Vs. Sh. Kulanand Lakhera and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2007

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT765; 2007(95)DRJ683

..... his possession was unsettled because he was challenged the moment he trespassed into the property. mcd could have resisted the trespass by use of even reasonable force. act of re-entry by mcd would have been lawful. i repeat litigious possession cannot create settled possession. 103. having lost the battle before the revenue authorities ..... by the revenue assistant. said order has attained finality. petitioner managed to retain possession under strength of interim orders. ejectment proceedings under the delhi land reforms act 1954 have attained finality, but warrant of possession could not be executed as petitioner had an interim stay in the suit. the said suit has since ..... the plaintiff constitutes the cause of action. thus, the cause of action for a trespasser, to maintain an action under section 6 of the specific relief act must consists of averments in the plaint which, if traversed, on being proved by evidence establish and prove the four requirements of settled possession as explained .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2007 (HC)

Bal Kishan @ Bal Kishan Sewak Vs. the State of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-2007

Reported in : 2007(98)DRJ288

..... cognizance of an offence on the complaint after examining upon oath the complainant and the witnesses present:(b) when the complaint is made in writing by a public servant acting or purporting to act in discharge of his official duties, the magistrate need not examine the complainant and the witnesses;(c) in such case court may issue process or dismiss the complaint .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2007 (HC)

Essar Steel Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-09-2007

Reported in : 2007(122)ECC121; 2007(148)LC121(Delhi); 2008(222)ELT161(Del)

..... calcutta and the manufacturers were fully protected by the interim orders.55. the petitioners have approached the designated authority in april 2002 under the customs tariff act, 1975 for investigation into their allegations of dumping. such complaint was disposed of by the order dated 27th august, 2003 passed by the designated ..... countervailing duties and safeguard measures. member countries of the world trade organisation were party to this agreement. the legislature effected statutory amendments to the customs tariff act, 1973 which were effectuated with effect from 1st january, 1995 to bring the statute in line with the provisions of article 6 of gatt, 1994. dumping ..... challenge to the order dated 27th august, 2003 passed by the designated authority in exercise of its powers under section 14(b) of the customs tariff act, 1995 and customs tariff (identification, assessment and collection of anti dumping duty on dumped article and for determination of injury) rules, 1995 whereby the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //