Court : Allahabad
Decided on : May-07-1984
Reported in : AIR1984All234
..... clause (b) or clause (c) of article 39 was given by the constitution (twenty-fifth amendment) act, 1971 itself and secondly, because the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act had been enacted before the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976.'the supreme court also expressed its doubts about the correctness of the decision in minerva mills case wherein ..... the language of article 31c to show an intention of retrospectivity.'39. as already pointed out, in the case of sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. bharat coking coal ltd. : [1983]1scr1000 , the supreme court, while commenting that in minerva mills' case the question with regard to the validity of extension of the protection given ..... 37. learned counsel for the respondents cited before us the decision of the supreme court in the case of sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. bharat coking coal ltd. : [1983]1scr1000 . in this case, the supreme court had on occasion to refer to the changes introduced under article 31c of the constitution by constitution .....
Tag this Judgment!