Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Aug-09-1979
Reported in : AIR1980Raj27
..... of bank nationalisation act was challenged.14. so far as the present case is concerned, the two terms compensation and interest are separately used in the rajasthan land acquisition act. whereas compensation and the mode of compensation and consideration for adjudication of compensation is provided in chapters 2 ..... as held in bank nationalisation case (air 1970 sc 564, r. c. cooper v. union of india).10. mr. meherishi, learned counsel for the respondents on the contrary raised a serious preliminary objection, it was argued that under s. 18 of the act a reference can be ..... officer never becomes functus officio as alleged by mr. rastogi because the question of grant of interest under section 34 of the act is statutory duty to be performed by the land acquisition officer, as and when situation arises. the submission is that question of ..... made only in relation to four matters enumerated therein. these four matters are (1) measurement of land, (2) the amount of compensation, (3 ..... 1. the state of rajasthan us well as the superintending engineer, r. p. s. jawahar sagar dams, chambal project, rawatbhata have filed this revision application under section 115 c. p. c. and section 18(3) of the land aquisition act, against the order dated 22-7-76 passed by the land acquisition officer, chambal project kota in case no. 20493/1973 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Apr-20-1979
Reported in : 1979WLN247
..... for the appellant is that the sub-divisional magistrate should have normally given one day's time to he appellant for reflection after making the preliminary examination. in our opinion, no invariable rule as to the time to be given for reflection ran hi laid down. the length of ..... recorded the confessional statement of the appellant, has been examined by, the prosecution at the trial. he clearly stated in his deposition that after preliminary examination he gave time to the appellant for reflection and proceeded to record his confessional statement at 11.30 a.m. his evidence is not ..... the occurrence. the public prosecutors further submitted that the confessional statement made by the appellant was free, voluntary and true and could safely be acted upon and provided surer basis for conviction of the appellant under section 302, ipc, especially when it found support from other independent evidence on ..... . pardoned or would be benefited in any other manner?a. i was not told so. no allurement was offered to me.the above answers given by the appellant to the sub-divisional magistrate in the course of the preliminary examination negatived the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant ..... is a criminal appeal filed by kishan singh against the judgment of the additional sessions judge, udaipur, date february 22, 1973, by which the appellant was convicted under section 302, i.p.c. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.2. the incident that led to the arrest and prosecution of .....
Tag this Judgment!