Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-12-1990
Reported in : [1991]71CompCas669(Delhi)
..... if a case is actually initiated, only the court before which the complaint or trial is going on can grant relief. the preliminary objection has, thereforee, to be accepted.'15. i am in respectful agreement with the view expressed above.16. it may, however, be noted that in sri krishna parshad [1978] ..... said period, the day from which such period is to be computed shall be excluded.473. notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this chapter, any court may take cognizance of an offence after the expiry of the period of limitation, if it is satisfied on the facts and in the ..... directors was appointed by the court to supervise the affairs of the company and make payment to the creditors.4. in c. a. no. 516 of 1973, vide order dated february 7, 1974, the court superseded the previous board of directors, as was appointed under the scheme, and in its place, appointed ..... be relieved of the alleged liabilities and defaults for which the prosecutions have been launched against him under sections 159, 210 and 220 of the act.34. under the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is hereby relieved from the aforesaid liabilities/defaults for which the complaints have ..... .22. in the present case, the period of limitation for filing the complaints for the offences/defaults under sections 159, 210 and 220 of the act is six months because, under section 467of the criminal procedure code, these offences are punishable with fine only.23. sections 467, 468, 469 and 473 of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-16-1990
Reported in : 1991CriLJ669; 42(1990)DLT186; 1990(19)DRJ121
..... the calls made to v.k. jain were in connection with the matters relating to 'averilla' and 'ohdai' ships. he also mentioned that during preliminary discussions held with peter teh during april 1979 he indicated his willingness to arrange scuttling of the ships as desired by v.k. jain and his associates ..... have been framed on the basis of the said statements. section 161 of the code only lays down that any police officer making any investigation under this chapter, ..may examine orally any person supposed to be acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case. it is true that under section 160 of ..... at singapore could not have been taken note of by the metropolitan magistrate for framing the charge. he has argued that the code of criminal procedure, 1973, applies only in regard to the statements recorded by .the police under section 161 of the code in india. he has urged that under section ..... is not possible to even prima facie come to the conclusion that he has become member of the conspiracy and had done any illegal acts in pursuance to the conspiracy. i agree with the reasons given by the metropolitan magistrate in coming to the conclusion that no casein made out against his accused k.l. ..... criminal conspiracy as a substantive offence which offence postulates an agreement between two or more persons to do or cause to be done an illegal act or an act which is not illegal by illegal means and the same differs from other offences, in that mere agreement is made an offence even if .....
Tag this Judgment!