Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-17-2012
(Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order preferably in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare G.O.Ms.No.132, Law (LA and J SC.F) Department dated 16 Nov 11 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law wholly unconstitutinal and quash the same as such and consequently quash the notification dated 22 Dec 11 prepared by the 2nd Respondent as illegal and contrary to law and consequently or/and in the alternative declare that the amendment issued vide G.O.Ms.No.132 Law (LA and J SC. F) department dated 16 Nov 11 is only prospective in nature and shall not be made applicable to the selection process already started pursuant to the recruitment notification dated 19.8.010 issued by the 1st Respondent for appointment to 18 District and Sessions Judges and consequently direct the respondents to prepare a fresh select list of recruit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-02-2012
Common Order:- Since the facts of all these petitions are one and the same and common arguments have been advanced by both the learned counsel in all these petitions, they are being disposed of by this common order. Criminal Petition Nos.4593 and 4594 of 2012 have been filed by M/s. Jagati Publications Limited and V. Vijaya Sai Reddy (hereinafter referred to as ‘A-2’) respectively, seeking to set aside/quash the orders of the Principal Special Judge, CBI Cases, Hyderabad,(hereinafter referred to as ‘Special Judge’) dated 27.04.2012 made in R.C. No.19(A)/2011 taking cognizance of the final report submitted on 31.03.2012 and in issuing summons to the accused by assigning C.C. No.8 of 2012 and to direct the Special Judge to consider the taking of cognizance in the matter after entire investigation is completed. Criminal Petition No.4742 of 2012 has been filed challenging the order dated 28.05.2012 passed in C.C. No.8 of 2012 in R.C. No.19(A)/2011-CBI/HYD, by the Sp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Oct-19-2012
ORAL ORDER: (Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This complaint is filed against MAYTAS (herein after called the developer) praying to direct the developer to hand over the finished flat under sale by executing registered sale deed or in the alternative refund the sale consideration with interest, besides penalty amount @ Rs. 5/- per sft of the super built up area together compensation and costs and also against State Bank of India (herein after called the bank) for refund of the amount disbursed by the bank to the developer together with penal interest and credit into their loan account etc. u/s 17 of the Consumer Protection Act. 2) The case of the complainants in brief is that the developer floated a venture and agreed to sell apartments situated in Sy192/P to 198/P, 201/P and 282/P at Bachupally of Qutubullapur Mandal, in Ranga Reddy district in an extent of Ac. 85.36 Guntas of land. The developer represented that it had obtained layout permission from HUDA on 21-3-2006 fo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-19-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITON NOs.25583 of 2010, 1708, 17915, 17922 AND 1793.OF 201.31-01-2012 V. Narasimha Rao The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Industries & Commerce Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad rep., by its Secretary and seven others. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Kambhampati Ramesh Babu Counsel for respondents : G.P. for Mines & Geology G.P. for Industries & Commerce G.P. for Revenue Sri P. Kamlakar Sri S. Sri Ram Sri Andapalli Sanjeev Kumar Addl. Advocate General Citations:1. (1982) 2 SCC 44.2) (2010) 10 SCC 32.3) (1998) 1 SC4. (2008) 3 SCC 54.5) (1996) 6 SCC 58.6) 2011(3) ALD 68.(DB) 7) 2001(4) SCC 53.8) 2003(1) SCC 69.9) AIR 199.SC 174.10) AIR 196.SC 167.11) (1984 (2) SCC 50.12) (2001)8 SCC 6.13) (2003)5 SCC 13.14) (2003)2 SCC 45.15) (2005)10 SCC 43.16) (2004)11 SCC 62.17) (1986 (4) SCC 74.18) AIR 199.SC 9.19) (2001)4SCC 13.20) (2001)3 SCC 73.21) (2001) 5 SCC 40.22) (2001)8 SCC 67.23) (2001) 8 SCC 54.24) (2004)7 SCC 59.25) (2007) 2 S...
Tag this Judgment!