Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : May-01-2009
Reported in : 2009(4)ALT431:AIR2009NOC2482(A.P)(F.B).
V.V.S. Rao, J.Introduction*1. Whether 'ghee' is a 'product of livestock', under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce & Livestock) Markets Act, 1966 (the Act, for brevity) and whether Government Notification vide G.O.Ms. No. 286, Agriculture 8B Cooperation (Mktg-1) Department, dated 05.07.1994 notifying among others, 'ghee' as one of the products of livestock for the purpose of regulation of purchase and sale in all notified market areas is not valid? These are the two questions before this Full Bench. The consideration of these two questions involves interpretation of Sections 3 and 4 of the Act. This case, or at least, one question involved in this case, was once decided by a Division Bench of this Court in Gurram Polisetti v. Government of Andhra Pradesh 200 (4) ALD 253 (DB). The Division Bench judgment was assailed before the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 4484 of 2000 (Guntur District Produ. M.A. Co-op Un. Ltd. v. Agricultural Market Committee). The apex Court ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-06-2009
Reported in : 2009(1)ALT754
ORDERGoda Raghuram, J.Competing interpretations of recurrent-contemporaneous events:1. Since the inception of the naxalite movement in Andhra Pradesh in 1969, 551 police personnel were killed including one DIG, two S.Ps, five D.S.Ps; 16 Inspectors and 49 Sub-Inspectors. 2928 civilians were killed; public and private property worth hundred of crores of rupees was destroyed; the extremist groups indulged in mindless violence and committed brutal murders. The naxal violence increased since 1991. They deliberately ambush and attack police with sophisticated firearms and explosives. In order to create terror the Maoists are also targeting functionaries of ruling political parties and killing them brutally - (counter affidavit of the Director General of Police in W.P. No. 15419/06 including Annexures 2 and 7)2. The State Executive for the first time started extra-legal killing which is popularly known as Encounter since 1968 and as on today in the name of alleged encounter the State has snat...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-04-2009
Reported in : 2010(1)ALT453
P.S. Narayana, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the unsuccessful plaintiffs in O.S. No. 22 of 78 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Mahaboobnagar. The said suit was instituted praying for the relief of eviction after demolishing the construction made on a portion of the plaint schedule property and also for the relief of injunction restraining defendants 1 to 5 or any of them from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the plaintiffs relating to the area marked in red in the sketch and for mesne profits and also for the other appropriate reliefs.2. The learned Subordinate Judge, Mahaboobnagar, in the light of the respective pleadings of the parties, having settled the issues, recorded the evidence of P.Ws.1 to 4 and D.Ws.1 to 7, marked Ex.A.1 to Ex.A.24, Ex.B.1 to Ex.B.11 and Ex.X.1 and on appreciation of the evidence, came to the conclusion that the plaintiffs are not entitled to the reliefs prayed for and accordingly dismissed the suit. Aggrieved by the same, the plaintiffs ...
Tag this Judgment!