Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal bearing areas acquisition and development act 1957 preamble 1 coal bearing areas acquisition and development act 1957 Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 7 results (0.139 seconds)

Apr 12 1993 (HC)

Bhagwan Dhan Vs. Rajasthan Housing Board, Jaipur and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1994Raj77; 1993(3)WLC644

..... which the commissioner of income-tax and the central board of revenue have been authorised to transfer the case of a particular assessee from the ito of the area within which he resides to any other income-tax officer, the apex court upheld the validity of the said provision and stated in para 21 that it may ..... power is exercised by several other states in our country, including the government of maharashtra. the state government has been authorised under regulation 16 of the maharashtra housing and area development (estate management, sale, transfer and exchange of tenements) regulations, 1981 to allot the houses to the extent of 2% to any person, as desired by the ..... of a house in janta group and deposited the registration amount of rs. 100/ - for the same (anx, 1). this scheme was for jawahar nagar and lal kothi areas. in the year, 1981, the board introduced revised procedure for registration of the house, the information of which was published in the newspaper (anx. 2). according to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 1986 (HC)

Mangalam Cement Ltd. and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1987Raj186; 1987(2)WLN643

..... mohanlal v. r. kondiah). it is not disputed that the petitioners are the owners of the cement industries. merely because the land was acquired under the rajasthan land acquisition act and the purpose therein was defined as public purpose it cannot be said that the petitioners are holding or using the land for public purpose. in the contest the ..... right..... in the context of sections 78 and 79 andthe scheme of those truth a 'tax on lands' within entry 49 of the state list.'in western coal fields ltd. v. special area development authority, korba, air 1982 sc 697 it was held that the property tax under the m.p. nagar to the gram nivash adhiniyam (23 of 1973 ..... enumeration of broad categories. in raja jagannath baksh singh v. state of u.p., air 1962 sc 1563 learned judge gajendragadkar j. observed that it is necessary to bear in mind that we are interpreting the words used in the constitution and it is an elementary cardinal rule of interpretation, that the words used in the constitution which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 1981 (HC)

Sanwal Ram and Etc. Vs. Additional District Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1982Raj139

..... observed that the principal act with all the amendments made therein, which essentially is meant for imposition of ceiling on agricultural holdings and acquisition and distribution of the surplus area to landless and weaker sections of the society, is in substance and reality an enactment dealing with agrarian reform and squarely falls within ..... punishment, penalty and procedure from sections 24 to 29. failure to furnish returns or furnishing false returns or making false declaration or acquisition of land in excess of the ceiling area or contravention of any lawful order, have been made penal and cognizance of the offence can be taken on a complaint in ..... in question is judicial.' at p. 84, he states :--'nevertheless, functions may become re-viewable as 'judicial' because of statutory interpretation of a procedure bearing a superficial resemblance to a lis inter partes.a minister acting as confirming authority must act judicially in accordance with the rules of natural justice from the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2002 (HC)

Bhawani Singh Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1755; 2002(5)WLN269

..... each government or authority has to devise its own criteria or principles for regularisation having regard to all the relevant circumstances, but while doing so, it should bear in mind the observations made herein.' 46. in this connection, it is relevant to notice that the court quoted with approval the importance of safeguarding the ..... the provisions of section 9 of the act of 1999 which conveys prohibition against regularisation on any ground whatever, apparently, in the aforesaid situation, the principal area of operation of the act, from the scheme appears to be, to prohibit regularisation of such employees by way of giving them regular appointment under any of ..... the realm of legislation. 170. one ancillary aspect is that while leaving it to state govt. to nominate an officer to act as competent officer for different areas, departments and institutions or for different purpose, who need not necessarily an officer of high ranking, but may be of lowest, rank, no guideline appear from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 1973 (HC)

Surajmal and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1974Raj116; 1973()WLN598

..... we cannot say this argument has no force.24. lastly, mr. rastogi argued that in appeal no. 335/71 land bearing no. 212/505 was not notified under section 4 or under section 6 of the acquisition act. this chunk of land measures 4 biswas and the appellant is entitled to the same treatment as the learned single judge ..... before us. in munshi singh's case 34,000 acres of land in 50 villages around ghaziabad were sought to be acquired 'for the planned development of the area'. there was no indication in the notification as to whether the land would be utilised for the purposes of u. p. state industrial corporation or the improvement trust ..... the appellants were treated differently in regard to the allotment of landthan came other people whose lands wereacquired. to some of the persons landwas allotted as much in area as it wastaken. to others more land was giventhan what was taken. we cannot spellout any discrimination on this ground because for the purposes of planning certainadjustments of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 1979 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. S. Zoraster and Co.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1982]133ITR559(Raj)

..... if the lump sum payment brings in a capital asset, then that puts the business on another footing altogether. thus, if labour saving machinery was acquired, the cost of such acquisition cannot be deducted out of the profits by claiming that it relieves the annual labour bill, the business has acquired a new asset, that is, machinery. the expressions ' enduring benefit ..... expenditure is so related to the carrying on or conduct of the business, that it may be regarded as an integral part of the profit-earning process and not for acquisition of an asset or a right of a permanent character, the possession of which is a condition of the carrying on of the business, the expenditure may be regarded as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 1982 (HC)

H.S. Chauhan and ors. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1982WLN321

..... corporation of india (staff) sixth amendment regulations, 1978 are declared ultra vires, invalid and the respondents are restrained from enforcing them.90. the parties are left to bear their own costs.91. mr. jindal and mr. tibrewal, the learned counsel for the corporation submitted that since the impugned order and the regulations have been struck ..... from what has been said above, an agent is free to book business throughout the length and breadth of the country. when he books business outside the area of operation of the concerned development officer under whom he would have originally been allotted or on whose recommendation he has been appointed, gets on benefits of ..... in paragraph 6--'duties and obligations' as under:6. duties and obligation;your duties are mainly to organise and develop the business of the corporation in the area allotted to you, and for that purpose to recruit active and reliable agents drawn from different communities and walks of life on such terms as may be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2006 (HC)

Dharmendra Kataria Vs. Ganganagar Sugar Mills Ltd. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(3)Raj1892

..... the state bank of india act, 1955 as also the various provisions contained in the said act. their lordships also considered the provisions of the banking companies(acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970 and thereupon observed in para 9 of the judgment as under:9. ...xxx...xxxx...xxxxxx.... the general superintendence, ..... er at p.1071 d, wlr at p.732, state of haryana v. sampuran singh air at p. 1957. if a language used is capable of bearing more than one construction, in selecting the true meaning, regard must be had to the consequences, resulting from adopting the alternative constructions. a construction that results ..... interpretation and appraisal is imbued with creativity and realism and since interpretation always implied a degree of discretion and choice, the courts would adopt, particularly in areas such as, constitutional adjudication dealing with social and defuse rights. courts are therefore, held as 'finishers, refiners and polishers of legislation which comes to them .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //