Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal bearing areas acquisition and development act 1957 preamble 1 coal bearing areas acquisition and development act 1957 Court: delhi Page 9 of about 131 results (0.287 seconds)

Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, Delhi vs.schneider Electric India Pvt ...

Court : Delhi

..... of some measures of interconnection may be all that is needed. an essential pre-requisite is, however, the acquisition of necessary legislative power not only to facilitate the establishment of this system in newly licensed areas but also to control the operation of existing licensees so as to secure fully coordinated development. government feels that ..... to the appropriate assessing authority upto the time of assessment by it- (a) copy of the bill(s)/ cash memo(s) on account of such sales bearing the name and signature of the officer of such undertaking receiving the goods; (b) a certificate in the following form issued by such undertaking and signed ..... pradesh v. narasimhan 1976 1 s.c.r. 61, bhajya v. gopikabai [1978].3scr561, mahindra & mahindra ltd. v. union [1979].2scr1038 and western coal fields v. special area development authority [1982].2scr1 . it is unnecessary to make a detailed reference to these decisions. it is sufficient to say that they draw a distinction between referential .....

Micolube India Limited Vs. Rakesh Kumar Trading as Saurabh Industries ...

Court : Delhi

..... (3) 30. i find that the question no. 2 and 3 under the reference are connected to each other and the answer of the one would have the bearing on the answer of another. therefore, i have taken two questions together and proceeded to answer the same.31. before beginning i would again say that the question under ..... an author-inventor must elect between the two available modes of securing exclusive rights.83. thereafter the said intention of congress was extended by the court permitting the area of overlapping and dual protection which infused the acceptance of policy change relating to dual protection in law and the court answered that the election principle is not ..... in the case of application of richard q. yardley 493 federal 2d 1389. the court in the case analyzed two questions which are reproduced hereinafter:is there an area of overlap wherein a certain type of subject matter is both statutory subject matter under the copyright statute (meaning a type of subject matter which, by definition, .....

Amway India Enterprises Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)111ITD112(Delhi)

..... license to use computer software an assesses acquires copyright and therefore the expenditure was to be treated as capital expenditure.31. on the question of expenditure on "acquisition, up gradation and maintenance of "software", shri devender shankar submitted that in the modern day technology, hardware and software are often acquired separately. any transaction ..... allowed by the cit (a) as revenue expenditure. the tribunal was basically concerned with case of software by purchaser. software being an intangible asset, its acquisition was rightly treated as a capital expenditure. he also highlighted the fact that in view of the admitted position that the software were purchased by the assessee ..... technical know-how at any particular stage in this fast changing area of medical science. the state of the art in some of these areas of high priority research is constantly updated so that the know-how could not be said to bear the element of the requisite degree of durability and non-ephemerality .....

Aseem Kapoor vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... provided by sdmc to hotel for 12- carrying out renovation/alteration in the existing building structure of hyatt regency.(by ms.gauri rishi). 13- documents bearing file no.101/cc/b/sz/1dated 29.11.2013 regarding issuance of completion/occupancy certificate in r/o hotel hyatt regency, bhikaji cama place, ..... in general, working through the respective head of department to take corrective action where necessary. conducts frequent and thorough inspections of guest rooms and rooms areas in general together with the housekeeping manager and other assistant managers - front office. ensures the strict control of room keys. assists in securing external ..... regulation 8(iv) 5. emergency lighting and self luminescent markings were not terrace, emergency provided exist/route/staircase. (violation of regulation 8(iv) in strategic areas like 6. emergency exit/route were not properly maintained. (violation of regulation15) 7. public address system was not used to give messages in multi languages about .....

Federation of Indian Mineral Industries (Fimi) Vs. Union of India and ...

Court : Delhi

..... of applications for renewal. (xiii) the amendment vide notification dated 18th july, 2014 to rule 24a(6) is prospective in nature and effect and has no bearing or operation upon applications for renewal made prior to its promulgation. the petitions accordingly seek the reliefs of: (a) declaration that the amendment vide notification dated ..... court as well as this court in numerous proceedings regarding mining activities and as it was also heard by the supreme court before cancelling the allocations of coal blocks. it is further pleaded, that the state governments are implementing the amendment to rule 24a(6) vide notification dated 18 th july, 2014 retrospectively ..... the constitution, relevant facts showing how it was discriminatory ought to have been set out.9. yet again in sanjeev coke manufacturing company vs. bharat coking coal limited (1983) 1 scc147 it was expressed that it is not open to a court to answer academic or hypothetical questions, particularly so when serious constitutional .....

M/S Orissa Manganese and Minerals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... of applications for renewal. (xiii) the amendment vide notification dated 18th july, 2014 to rule 24a(6) is prospective in nature and effect and has no bearing or operation upon applications for renewal made prior to its promulgation. the petitions accordingly seek the reliefs of: (a) declaration that the amendment vide notification dated ..... court as well as this court in numerous proceedings regarding mining activities and as it was also heard by the supreme court before cancelling the allocations of coal blocks. it is further pleaded, that the state governments are implementing the amendment to rule 24a(6) vide notification dated 18 th july, 2014 retrospectively ..... the constitution, relevant facts showing how it was discriminatory ought to have been set out.9. yet again in sanjeev coke manufacturing company vs. bharat coking coal limited (1983) 1 scc147 it was expressed that it is not open to a court to answer academic or hypothetical questions, particularly so when serious constitutional .....

Federation of Indian Mineral Industries (Fimi) Vs. Union of India & Or ...

Court : Delhi

..... of applications for renewal. (xiii) the amendment vide notification dated 18th july, 2014 to rule 24a(6) is prospective in nature and effect and has no bearing or operation upon applications for renewal made prior to its promulgation. the petitions accordingly seek the reliefs of: (a) declaration that the amendment vide notification dated ..... court as well as this court in numerous proceedings regarding mining activities and as it was also heard by the supreme court before cancelling the allocations of coal blocks. it is further pleaded, that the state governments are implementing the amendment to rule 24a(6) vide notification dated 18 th july, 2014 retrospectively ..... the constitution, relevant facts showing how it was discriminatory ought to have been set out.9. yet again in sanjeev coke manufacturing company vs. bharat coking coal limited (1983) 1 scc147 it was expressed that it is not open to a court to answer academic or hypothetical questions, particularly so when serious constitutional .....

M/S Orissa Manganese & Minerals Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... of applications for renewal. (xiii) the amendment vide notification dated 18th july, 2014 to rule 24a(6) is prospective in nature and effect and has no bearing or operation upon applications for renewal made prior to its promulgation. the petitions accordingly seek the reliefs of: (a) declaration that the amendment vide notification dated ..... court as well as this court in numerous proceedings regarding mining activities and as it was also heard by the supreme court before cancelling the allocations of coal blocks. it is further pleaded, that the state governments are implementing the amendment to rule 24a(6) vide notification dated 18 th july, 2014 retrospectively ..... the constitution, relevant facts showing how it was discriminatory ought to have been set out.9. yet again in sanjeev coke manufacturing company vs. bharat coking coal limited (1983) 1 scc147 it was expressed that it is not open to a court to answer academic or hypothetical questions, particularly so when serious constitutional .....

M/S Orissa Manganese and Minerals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... of applications for renewal. (xiii) the amendment vide notification dated 18th july, 2014 to rule 24a(6) is prospective in nature and effect and has no bearing or operation upon applications for renewal made prior to its promulgation. the petitions accordingly seek the reliefs of: (a) declaration that the amendment vide notification dated ..... court as well as this court in numerous proceedings regarding mining activities and as it was also heard by the supreme court before cancelling the allocations of coal blocks. it is further pleaded, that the state governments are implementing the amendment to rule 24a(6) vide notification dated 18 th july, 2014 retrospectively ..... the constitution, relevant facts showing how it was discriminatory ought to have been set out.9. yet again in sanjeev coke manufacturing company vs. bharat coking coal limited (1983) 1 scc147 it was expressed that it is not open to a court to answer academic or hypothetical questions, particularly so when serious constitutional .....

Federation of Indian Mineral Industries (Fimi) Vs. Union of India and ...

Court : Delhi

..... of applications for renewal. (xiii) the amendment vide notification dated 18th july, 2014 to rule 24a(6) is prospective in nature and effect and has no bearing or operation upon applications for renewal made prior to its promulgation. the petitions accordingly seek the reliefs of: (a) declaration that the amendment vide notification dated ..... court as well as this court in numerous proceedings regarding mining activities and as it was also heard by the supreme court before cancelling the allocations of coal blocks. it is further pleaded, that the state governments are implementing the amendment to rule 24a(6) vide notification dated 18 th july, 2014 retrospectively ..... the constitution, relevant facts showing how it was discriminatory ought to have been set out.9. yet again in sanjeev coke manufacturing company vs. bharat coking coal limited (1983) 1 scc147 it was expressed that it is not open to a court to answer academic or hypothetical questions, particularly so when serious constitutional .....