Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : AIR2004Chh11; 2002(4)MPHT53(CG)
..... this revision by the defendant is directed against the order dated 20-2-2002 passed by the additional civil judge, class-i, raigarh in civil suit no, 83-a/2002, rejecting petitioners' application to decide the question of the admissibility of certain documents adduced by the plaintiff during the course of his examination before the suit is disposed of. 2. ..... in the above view of the matter, it cannot be said that the court has committed any error so as to warrant any interference in exercise of jurisdiction under section 115 of the civil procedure code. ..... however, if the objection is upheld, they shall be dealt with in accordance with the provisions contained in rules 6 and 7 (2) of order xiii of the code of civil procedure. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT52(CG)
..... it is also relevant here to quote order 3 rule 2 of the code of civil procedure. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2003(1)MPHT46(CG)
..... ultimately the appellant/plaintiff filed the civil suit in the court of additional district judge, dhamtari.2. ..... the appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment and decree dated 7-9-2001 passed by the additional district judge, dhamtari in civil suit no. 44-a/91. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT52(CG)
..... learned trial court referred to order v rule 17 of the code of civil procedure (henceforth, 'the code') and held that the branch manager had no right to sign the plaint. ..... order vi of the code of civil procedure deals with pleading. ..... this appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 18-7-1990 passed by the vth additional district judge, bilaspur in civil suit no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT71(CG)
..... briefly stated facts are that the plaintiff namely pramod kumar agrawal filed a civil suit for eviction in relation to a tenanted premises identified as flat no. ..... 132-a/2002 by the 3rd additional judge to the court of first civil judge, class-i, raipur (c.g.).2. ..... this appeal under section 100 of the code of civil procedure has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 20-12-2004 passed in civil appeal no. ..... there is a concurrent finding of the two courts below in relation to the above question and the same can not be disturbed in the second appeal under section 100 of the code of civil procedure.18. ..... 11-a/2003 by the district judge, raipur (cg) arising out of judgment and decree dated 1-2-2003 passed in civil suit no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : AIR2006Chh49
..... this appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 20-11-1997 passed in civil suit no. ..... l-a/97 (old civil suit no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT5(CG)
..... moreover, this court is not inclined to pass an order of remand at the stage of second appeal in this case especially because the civil suit was instituted in the year 1986 and as many as 19 years have passed thereafter. ..... 10-a/89 whereby the first appellate court has reversed the judgment and decree dated 23-1- 89 of the 5th civil judge class-ii, durg in civil suit no. ..... however, civil suit no. ..... having perused the record of the civil suit no. ..... in appeal, the first appellate court held that the cause of action in civil suit no. ..... the defendant/appellant denying the allegations of the plaintiff resistance the suit inter alia on the ground that the judgment and decree in civil suit no. ..... the plaintiff/respondent brought a civil suit no. ..... aggrieved by the dismissal of his civil suit no. ..... this civil suit no. ..... chauhan, district judge, durg in civil appeal no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2002(4)MPHT18(CG)
..... 10-a/2001, confirming the judgment and decree dated 28-9-98 passed by the civil judge, class-i in civil suit no. l-a/98. ..... no substantial question of lawarises for determination of the case, which is sine qua non for invoking jurisdiction under section 100 of the code of civil procedure.12. ..... the appellant/defendant has preferred this appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate court, dated 26-7-2001 passed in civil appeal no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2003(1)MPHT91(CG)
..... against the order of trial court the plaintiff filed civil appeal no. ..... the civil appeal no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2002(5)MPHT1(CG)
..... the applicants have filed this revision petition against the order dated 12-10-2001 passed by the civil judge, class-ii in civil suit no. .....
Tag this Judgment!