Court : Karnataka
Reported in : (2010)27VST380(Karn)
ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. The petitioner in these petitions is assailing the correctness of the reassessment order and demand notice in form VAT-180 dated December 16, 2008, passed by the respondent under Section 39(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act (the KVAT Act, 2003) for the assessment period from April 2006 to March 2007 vide annexure G.2. The only grievance of the petitioner in these petitions is that, the petitioner is a partnership firm, registered under the provisions of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, carrying on the activity of importing from outside country and also purchasing from outside the State of Karnataka and locally slack wax, residue wax, paraffin wax, refined wax, etc., and selling the same in the State of Karnataka and outside the State of Karnataka. The petitioner being a registered firm, has filed monthly returns for the period from April 2006 to March 2007 in form VAT-100 declaring the sales turnover of slack wax, residue wax and paraffin wax, refine...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
ORDER1. The petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondents to fix the fair rent and pay the arrears with effect from 1.1.1985 to 31.12.2001 as per the claim statement vide Annexure-' J1' and ' J2'.2. The records reveal that the petitioner is the landlord of the premises, for which the respondents 1 and z were the tenants. The premises were allotted to respondents 1 and 2 by the Rent Controller. However, fair rent was not fixed. By the time the petitioner tried to get the fair rent fixed, the earlier Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, was repealed and consequently the fair rent was not fixed under the provisions of Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961.However, the petitioner approached this Court by filing Writ Petition No.47619/2003 praying for a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner for fixation of the fair rent. This Court disposed of the said writ petition on 19th October 2010 and directed the 3rd respondent herein to fix the fair rent to...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
These ITAs are filed u/sec.260a of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 praying to formulate the substantial question of law stated above, allow the appeal and set aside the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji Bench-Goa dtd:04.08.2015 vide ITA Nos. 152 to 161/Pnj/2015 to the extent urged in this appeal and pass such other suitable orders as this Hon ble High Court deems fit to grant relief on the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity. This ITA is filed u/sec.260a of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 praying to formulate the substantial question of law stated above, allow the appeal and set aside the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji Bench in ITA No.152/Pnj/2015 dated:4.8.2015 and confirm the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Bijapur. This ITA is filed u/sec.260a of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 praying to formulate the substantial question of law stated above, allow the appeal and set aside the orders passed b...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1998KAR3141; 1998(3)KarLJ494
ORDER1. Can the Licensing Authority exercising powers under the Licensing and Controlling of Places of Public Amusements (Bangalore City) Order, 1989, refuse a licence on the ground that the grant would offend the provision of any other statute in force? What is 'Entertainment' within the meaning of Rule 11 of the Karnataka Excise Licences (General Conditions) Rules, 1967? Should the term be interpreted ejusdem generis having regard to the Company it keeps in the said provision, or can the wide interpretation adopted by the Licensing Authority be accepted? These are some of the questions that fall for consideration in this bunch of petitions which assail the validity of orders passed by the Licensing Authority refusing to the petitioners licences to provide live music in their Bar and Restaurants, inter alia on the ground that live music is 'Entertainment' within the meaning of that expression in Rule 11 of the General Conditions Rules hence impermissible in a place where liquor is ser...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Dr. Bhakthavatsala, J1. The petitioner, who was the former Chief Minister (BJP) of the State of Karnataka, is before this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying for the following reliefs:(i) to issue a writ of certiorari and quash the Complaint dated 22.8.2011 filed by the 3rd respondent/Superintendent of Police, Karnataka Lokayukta, Bangalore, against him for the offences under Sections 7, 8, 9 and 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, at Annexure-A;(ii) to issue a writ of certiorari and quash the FIR registered in Crime No.36/2011 against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 7, 8, 9 and 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 at Annexure-A-1;(iii) to quash the Order of Sanction dated 2.8.2011 for initiating criminal proceedings against the petitioner at Annexure-B on the file of Governor of Karnataka;(iv) to quash the relevant portion of the Report at chapter 22 of Lokayukta dated 27.7....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC-D:5411-DB CRL.A No.100111 of 2021 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF MARCH, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100111 OF2021(374) BETWEEN: SANJAY S/O. KISHAN MOHITE @ RAJAN, AGED ABOUT52YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE, R/O: TAPE VILLAGE, GULAB CHAWAL, D.N. ROAD, AMDERI WEST MUMBAI APPELLANT (BY SRI. S.M. HATTARKI, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY COD, POLICE, BENGALURU, IN KARWAR TOWN POLICE STATION, KARWAR, REPRESENTED BY S.P.P. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, AT DHARWAD. RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.B. GUNDAWADE, ADDITIONAL, SPP) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION374(2) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER CONVICTION DATED2004/2021 PASSED BY THE IST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE UK, KARWAR SITTING AT SIRSI IN SC No.5001/2018, SC NO.5002/2018 & SC No.5003/2018 BY ALLOWING THE PRESENT CRIMINAL APPEAL AN...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [2009]93SCL112(Kar)
ORDERH.G. Ramesh, J.1. In this petition filed under Sections 391 - 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act'), the petitioner-Paxar India Private Limited (transferor-Company) has sought for sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation which is produced as Annexure-A, so as to be binding on the petitioner-Company, R.V.L. Packaging India Private Limited (another transferor-Company), Avery Dennison (India) Private Limited (transferee-Company) and their respective shareholders and creditors and all other persons.2. The petitioner-Company was incorporated on 16-9-1988 with the Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra. The registered office of the Company was shifted from Maharashtra to Karnataka with effect from 7-1-2000. The petitioner-Company was incorporated to carry on the business of manufacturing printed labels, cotton twill tapes, nova tapes, bar-codes, paper printed tags of all kinds etc.3. The registered office of the petitioner-Company is situated at 90/91, 7th Main Road, Peenya Industrial A...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [1993]77CompCas1(Kar); ILR1993KAR620; 1993(1)KarLJ412
Kedambady Jagannatha Shetty, J. 1. This company application is filed by the official liquidator under section 543 of the Companies Act, 1956, against 9 of the former directors of Messrs. Chamundi Chemicals and Fertilisers Ltd. (in liquidation) alleging acts of misfeasance and breach of trust. Respondents Nos. 1 to 8 were the directors of the company during the period noted below : Respondent No. 1 : From the date of incorporation till thedate of winding up order.Respondent No. 2 : From August 12, 1961, to February 11, 1969.Respondent No. 3 : From August 12, 1961, to June 22, 1972.Respondent No. 4 : From March 14, 1962, to October 11,1968. (as a nominee of the IndustrialFinance Corporation, Delhi.)Respondent No. 5 : From September 1, 1968, till the date ofwinding up order.Respondent No. 6 : From March 30, 1970, till the date ofwinding up order.Respondent No. 7 : From April 21, 1975, till the date ofwinding up order.Respondent No. 8 : From July 13, 1976, to the date ofwinding up order. 2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1993KAR880
ORDERKedambady Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. This Company Petition is presented by the petitioners under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (to be hereinafter called the 'Act'). The respondent-Company is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, in the name and style of M/s. Rakhra Sports Private Ltd, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Company').2. Petitioners 1 and 2 and respondents 2 and 3 were initially carrying on the business in partnership under the name and style of Rakhra Sports Company for more than three decades, in equal proportions contributed towards the capital and likewise in equal proportions they were sharing the profits and losses. Apart from their business relationship are also close family relationship. The firm of M/s. Rakhra Sports Company was being taken over as a going concern by the Company with effect from the close of working hours on 30.11.1993. The registered office of the respondent is located at No. 6 Commercial Street Bangalore...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1. This petition is filed under Section 101 of the Companies Act. 1956 for confirming the reduction of share capital of Daily Bread Gourmet Foods (India) Private limited.2. The petitioner Company was incorporated under the Companies Act. 1956 on 25th April 2003 in the name of CCD Daily Bread Private Limited and further name was changed to Daily Bread Gourmet Foods (India) Private Limited, which is evidenced by the fvesb Certificate of incorporation issued on 29-12-2006 by the Registrar of Companies. Bangalore, Kamataka. The certificate to this effect has been produced by the petitioner at Annexure-A.3. The Registered office of the Company is situated at No. 43, 4th B Cross. 5th Block. Koramangala Industrial Area. Bangalore and the main objects of the Company is to carry on business of manufacturing. producing, buying, selling. importing, exporting, marketing and to act as dealers and agents of Bakery products including food products, ready to eat items, spices, pickles, condiments, agr...
Tag this Judgment!