Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: chandigarh delegation of powers act 1987 Page 4 of about 236 results (0.081 seconds)

Gurdial Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1990P& H317; (1990)97PLR675

..... the managing committee of the chandigarh state cooperative bank, chandigarh wasremoved on december 29, 1981 and an administrator was kept appointed from time to time till august 4, 1987 and thereafter the registrar delegated his powers to the land acquisition officer-cum-deputy registrar co-operative societies, chandigarh to be a supervisor in his place for ..... supported by the chandigarh administration on the ground that although under the act an administrator of a committee could only be appointed for a maximum period of 5 years but the registrar could act as a supervisor or delegate supervisory power. ..... the period for which an administrator could be appointed could not exceed one year and six months as postulated in proviso to sub-section (1 -d) of section 26 of the act, on july 31, 1985 a communication was addressed by registrar, co-operative societies signed on his behalf by deputy registrar, co-operative societies (establishment) to the managing director 'sugarfed' directing that the matters ..... extra-ordinary situation prevailing in the state of punjab, the act could have been suitably amended to meet the prevailing situation. ..... act that he can exercise supervisory powers with regard to all the co-operative societies registered under the act ..... another proviso has been added to subsection (2) of section 26 of the act that no person shall be appointed as a managing director unless he is a member of indian administrative service, punjab civil service (executive branch) or a deputy .....

Haryana Financial Corporation Limited and ors. Vs. Kabis Shines Privat ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR2002P& H142

..... section 43a of the act provides for delegation of powers by the board by general or special order to the managing director or to any other officer of the financial corporation so appointed under section 21 of the act. ..... it was submitted that there was thus delegation of powers to the managers to engage local lawyers and to sign vakalatnamas. ..... 178.24 adopted on 21-8-89 by the board of directors in its meeting does not speak of any delegation of powers so far as the filing of appeals is concerned. ..... 178.24 delegation of powers tomanagers to engage local lawyers and to sign vakalatnamathe board approved thedelegation of powers to sign vakalatnama and all other documents inconnection with legal proceedings and to sign sale deeds, redemption deedsand agreement to sell and any other legal document for and on behalf of thecorporation to the managers and ..... suffice it to say, the decision of the haryana financial corporation to take possession of the unit and to put it to sale under section 29 of the act cannot be said to be arbitrary as this decision was taken when the plaintiff had failed to pay the loan amount although rescheduling was done. ..... on 21-8-89, board of directors of the haryana financial corporation, chandigarh passed a resolution giving powers to the branch managers to sign wakalatnamas and all other documents in connection legal proceedings and to sign sale deeds, redemption deeds and agreements to sell and any other legal document for and on behalf of the .....

Sahni Silk Mills (P) Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corp ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : I(1993)ACC677; JT1993(1)SC439; 1993(1)SCALE441; (1993)2SCC1

..... the very power of delegation of all or any of its powers or functions under the act by the corporation conferred under section 94a thereof on any officer or authority subordinate thereto could have been delegated to such officer or authority is, therefore, the question which arises for our consideration ..... section 94a of the act permits the corporation to delegate the powers exercisable by it to any of its officers ..... the contention is that the director general could not have further delegated his powers to the regional director, as that would amount to double delegation, which is forbidden in law. ..... section 94a empowers corporation to delegate all or any of its powers and functions on any officer or authority subordinate to it ..... admittedly the corporation had delegated the powers exercisable by it to the director general or any officer authorised by him ..... an order under section 85b of the act was passed against the appellants by the regional director, chandigarh imposing damages assessed at over rs. ..... dhondu naraya chowdhary: : [1965]2scr929 , it was held that double delegation was permissible if allowed by the statute. ..... purporting to act under this resolution the regional director, who has been authorised by the director general to exercise powers under the act, has passed the order.4 ..... 15,000/-, on the ground that the appellants had defaulted in depositing in time the employers contribution under section 40 of the act. ..... appeals arise out of a proceeding under employees state insurance act. .....

Municipal Corporation Vs. Lurindamal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(2)MPHT303

..... of the facts and law and we do not find any conflict between them.thus, after analysing the clear legal position we hold that after the amendment in section 20 of the act of 1954 the local authority or any person authorised by local authority has no power and jurisdiction to initiate the prosecution or to file any complaint and a person authorised in this behalf by general or special order by the central government or the state government can file the ..... therefore, the learned single judge has held that the complaint was filed by food inspector pathak and not by the municipal corporation and pathak had derived powers directly from the state government and, therefore, was competent to institute the prosecution in his capacity as a private purchaser as has been rightly held by the learned trial magistrate and dismissed the preliminary objection raised by ..... the food inspector as well could give his consent for launching of prosecution and in doing so he was neither delegating his power nor acting contrary to section 20. ..... the written consent of the central government or the state government or a person authorised in this behalf by general or special order, by the central government or the state government.provided that a prosecution for art offence under this act may be instituted by a purchaser or recognised consumer association referred to in section 12 if he or it produces in court a copy of the repot of the public analyst along with the complaint. ..... chandigarh v. .....

Gainda Mal Charanji Lal Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1978HP17

..... the petitioner these provisions also incorporate excessive delegation of power to tax in favour of the government. ..... bench was constituted to consider the following three questions which were referred to it.1 are sections 3 and 4 of the himachal pradesh passengers and goods taxation act, 1935 ultra vires and void either because they infringe article 19 (1) (f) and (g) or because they infringe article 301 of the constitution of india?2. ..... since it was found that the petitioner had challenged the validity of the provisions contained in sections 3 and 4 of the act, all the three judges of this court were required to determine the question about the said vires as provided in sub-article (3) of the article 228 (a) ..... do these provisions incorporate excessive delegation to tax in favour of the government and are they void on ..... petition it has challenged the vires of sections 3 and 4 of the act called himachal pradesh passengers and goods taxation act, 1955 (act 15 of 1955) (which is hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and second proviso to rule 9 of the rules framed under the act on 13th march, 1970.2. ..... is a registered partnership firm and carries on, inter alia, the business of transportation of goods as carriers in punjab, haryana, union territory of chandigarh and himachal pradesh. ..... 1952 the erstwhile state of punjab had enacted the punjab passengers and goods taxation act, 1952 after receiving the assent of the president on 30th august, 1952. ..... the union territory of chandigarh, and rs. .....

Present: Mr. Gopal Sharma Advocate Vs. State of Haryana …respondent

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the act does not empower the delegation of the powers of the investigations or trial of the violations of the orders issued under section 3 of the act. ..... the court held that there is no provision in the act, which kumar vimal 2013.09.17 10:28 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh cra no.225-sb o 13. ..... we are, therefore, unable to find any cogent or convincing reason for holding that the parliament intended by enacting the essential commodities kumar vimal 2013.09.17 10:28 i attest to the accuracy and act or the fruit order to impliedly repeal the provisions of the integrity of this document chandigarh cra no.225-sb o 10. ..... the court held that in view of the specific provisions for issuance of a search warrant under the foreign exchange regulation act, 1947, the sections 96 & 98 as well as form 8 of schedule v of the code of criminal procedure, 1898 will not operate in connection with kumar vimal 2013.09.17 10:28 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh cra no.225-sb o 7. ..... examining section 11 of the act and section 251-a of the code of criminal procedure, 1898, the supreme court held that where the information discloses a cognizable as well as a non-cognizable offence, the police officer is not debarred from investigating any non-cognizable offence kumar vimal 2013.09.17 10:28 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh cra no.225-sb o 8. .....

Present: Mr. J.K.Sibal Senior Advocate with Vs. Amritsar Improvement T ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... trust under section 13) to be members of committee under section 14; (iv) for regulating the delegation of powers or duties of the trust to committees or to the chairman; (v) for the guidance of persons employed by it under this act; (vi) for fixing the fees payable for copies of documents delivered under sub-section (3) of section 36 or under section 75; (vii) for the management, use and regulation of dwellings constructed under any scheme under this act; (viii) generally for carrying out the purposes of this ..... whether the act of defendant in putting the plots under possession of the plaintiffs to sale without first offering them for sale to the plaintiff is ultra vires and illegal beyond its powers, as vinod kumar 2014.07.02 15:10 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh rsa no.3258 of 1984 (o&m) [4]. ..... ***** in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh rsa no.3258 of 1984 (o&m) date of decision:30.06.2014 banarsi lal and others ...appellants versus amritsar improvement trust, amritsar ...respondent coram: hon'ble mr. .....

Ambala Bus Syndicate Private Ltd. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1960P& H142

..... the mere fact that the minister thought that interest of the travelling public would not be advanced by extending the present petitioner's route from kharar to chandigarh because there were fair number for services, of the punjab roadways and also of the petitioner, passing through kharar and chandigarh does not make his order assailable in the present proceedings.it is not open to this court to substitute its own opinion for that of the ..... this order the punjab roadways went up in revision to the state government under section 64(h) of the indian motor vehicles act, 1939, as amended by the punjab amendment act of 1948.this revision according to the writ petition, was initially heard by the secretary, transport department, punjab government, to whom the power of hearing appeals had been delegated. ..... , from the locality, the municipal committee, rupar, and the congress committee, chandigarh, also made a representation to the regional transport authority supporting the proposed extension; but the regional transport authority, this time, after coming to know of the views of the provincial transport controller, also rejected ..... directive, according to the reply, was issued under section 44 (4) of the motor vehicles act.it is finally pleaded that refusal of the extension had done no harm or injustice to the company whose permits on rupar-kharar route were not reduced; public interest has also no suffered because adequate road transport services on rupar-chandigarh route already exist. .....

Sialkot Silk Stores Vs. Chief Commissioner, Union Territory

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1969]23STC51(P& H)

..... come for consideration of the learned judges, but those cases are not of assistance because if the argument here was whether the final notification issued by the chief commissioner of the union territory of chandigarh under sub-section (2) of section 6 of punjab act 46 of 1948 was or was not law, then those cases could have been of some assistance, but not one of those cases, on facts, has anything near consideration the question that arises ..... was not law before 1st november, 1966, and has not been law after that date within the meaning and scope of the word 'law' as defined in section 2(g) of act 31 of 1966, with the result that section 88 of the last-mentioned act is not attracted to it, and thus that notification has not the force of law on the basis of which the final amendment as made by the respondent could have been made in the terms ..... 3269 of 1st november, 1966, the central government has delegated its powers to the chief commissioner of the union territory of chandigarh. ..... the question here is whether the first notification issued and published by the 'existing state of punjab' on 24th august, 1966, under sub-section (2) of section 6 of punjab act 46 of 1948 indicating its intention to amend item 30 in schedule b to that act is within the scope of the term 'law' as defined in section 2(g) of act 31 of 1966 no doubt that definition is inclusive, but the argument on the side of the parties has only been confined to what is included in that definition, and nothing beyond .....

Shashi Kant Vs. Registrar Cooperative Societies Ut Chandigarh and Othe ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... salaried or unsalaried employees of the bank provided that any employee aggrieved by an order of the board of directors dismissing, suspending or otherwise punishing him may appeal therefrom to the registrar (who may delegate this power of deciding such appeal to the additional/joint registrar) and the decision of the appellate authority shall be final and binding on parties. ..... the same, the petitioner filed revision petition under section 69 of the punjab cooperative societies act, 1961 (as applicable to u.t.chandigarh) (hereinafter referred to as, the act ).however, the same was also dismissed vide order dated 28.04.2010 civil writ petition no. ..... of the petitioner, who was working as junior clerk with the chandigarh state cooperative bank limited, chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as, the bank ).were terminated by the administrator of the bank vide order dated 26.02.2007 (annexure p-4).the petitioner filed statutory appeal before the registrar, cooperative societies-cum-appellate authority, union territory, chandigarh, which was dismissed vide order dated 16.06.2009 (annexure p-5).aggrieved from ..... 28.04.2010 (annexure p-6) is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the revisional authority under section 69 of the act as applicable to the union territory, chandigarh. .....