Court : DRAT Madras
..... was allowed on the basis that as on the date of the order of attachment, the law was not extended to the province of delhi so as to claim exemption from attachment and therefore, he has urged that the territorial operation of the amendment act, which extended the provision under section-60(1) (ccc) to the union territory of delhi, cannot be made applicable to any decree or claim beyond the territory for which the enactment was ..... for consideration are as follows :- 1) whether the schedule house property situated at delhi is exempt from attachment as per section-60(1) (ccc) of the code of civil procedure as amended vide notification dated 8.6.1956, published in the gazette of india on 16.6.1956, by the central government extending the provisions of the punjab relief of indebtedness amendment acts vii of 1940 and vi of 1942, to the then union territory of delhi ? ..... umasuthan, for the 1st respondent bank has pointed out with reference to the articles 245 and 246 of the constitution of india in support of his further contention that even though the amendment referred to above with reference to section-60(1) (ccc) was made by the notification issued by the union government extending the punjab relief of indebtedness amendment act, to the union territory of delhi also, such amendment cannot have the effect of a legislation extra- ..... purpose of appreciating the arguments advanced on either side, it is essential to extract articles 245 and 246 of the constitution of india hereunder :- 245. .....
Tag this Judgment!