Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: central industrial security force act 1968 section 2 definitions Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 1,463 results (0.451 seconds)

Rajesh Pratap Singh Son of Shri Raghav Pratap Singh Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC3164

..... to the writ petition). the petitioner, being aggrieved by the order of dismissal from service, preferred an appeal before respondent no. 1- deputy inspector general, central industrial security force, ministry of home affairs who too rejected his appeal without application of his mind vide impugned order dated 22.4.1997 (annexure no. 8 to the writ ..... quashing the impugned orders dated 16.5.1994 (annexure no. 7 to the writ petition) passed by respondent no. 2 commandant, central industrial security force, ministry of home affairs, new delhi and dated 22.4.1997 (annexure no. 8 to the writ petition) passed by respondent no. 1 deputy inspector ..... no. 7 to the writ petition) passed by respondent no. 2- commandant, central industrial security force, ministry of home affairs and order dated 22.4.1997 (annexure no. 8 to the writ petition) passed by respondent no. 1- deputy inspector general, central industrial security force, ministry of home affairs are hereby quashed. i do not feel it proper .....

Surendra Singh Negi and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1998)3UPLBEC2347

..... whole episode, without any corresponding advantage to the petitioners.9. let us first understand as to what is central industrial security force. cisf has been constituted under the central industrial security force act. 1968 with the object of providing for the better protection and security of industrial undertakings owned by that central government as well as those in public sectors, the act came to be amended in the year 1983 (act ..... familiar as also the substitutions. for these reasons, a brief narration of facts and a common judgment in all the seven cases with suffice.2. 1862 posts of constables in central industries security force (for short 'csif') in the pay scale of rs. 825-1200 were advertised in october 1996. these posts were spread over various states of the country. out of these 1892 .....

Dhruv Singh Yadav Vs. Director General Central Industrial Security For ...

Court : Allahabad

..... the rule nor claimed disability pension in the writ petition. 10. the reliance placed on a judgment of andhra pradesh in a. seshaiah vs. commandant, central industrial security force, unit hyderabad [2005 (106) flr 1156] is not helpful inasmuch as in para 12 of the judgment, the andhra pradesh high court took notice of ..... under section 47 of the pwd act, exempting all categories of posts of 'combatant personnel' only of the central para military forces (cpmfs) namely central reserve police force (crpf), border security force (bsf), indo tibetan border police (itbt), central industrial security force (cisf) and assam rifles, from the provision of said section, the said provisions cannot be invoked or ..... counsel for the appellant. sri a.n. rai appears for the respondents. 2. in this intra court appeal, the petitioner-appellant enrolled in central industrial security force as a constable on 26.8.1988 and discharged on 26.6.1995 under rule 38 of the ccs rules, is aggrieved by the judgment .....

Smt. Neeraj Sharma Vs. Sri R.S. Yadav, Constable, and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... of the scene except constable jai murat were neither produced nor any bona fide or genuine effort was made to produce them and compel their presence. the central industrial security force is a police force and it cannot be presumed that the prosecution was helpless in producing the witnesses when it was proceeding to deal with the services of a member of ..... 1. the 3 orders under challenge in this petition relate to the removal of the petitioner from service from the post of a lady constable in the central industrial security force. 2. the petitioner was removed from service vide order dated 28.6.2006 and the appeal filed by her met the same fate on 12.9.2006. ..... on record by sri rathore with his forensic arguments. 17. the narration of facts indicate that the petitioner had been transferred from her place of posting at the industrial unit to another place which under the orders of the superior authorities had been deferred on 19.10.2005. the petitioner appears to have not been able to .....

Mahesh Chandra Dixit Vs. Director Mandi Parishad and Another

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1732

..... the present case as has been explained in managing director, ecil's case, referred to above. learned counsel for the respondents referred to and relied upon the decision in commandant central industrial security force v. bhopal singh, 1993 (4) scc 787 ; h.s. arora v. union of india, 1997 (2) scc 398 and inspecting assistant commissioner board v. shared narain parab, 1998 (1) scc .....

Rajendra Kumar Dubey Son of Sri Lakshmi Kant Dubey Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2007(114)FLR643]

..... vineet saran, j.1. the petitioner was a constable in the central industrial security force. for an incident which occurred on 21.12.2002, the petitioner was given a charge-sheet. after he submitted his reply, an enquiry was conducted in which he was held ..... and 19 minor penalties. it has not even been stated that the petitioner has ever filed any appeal against such orders imposing penalty. the petitioner belongs to a disciplined armed force where the work and conduct, as well as discipline, is of prime importance. the various penalties which had been imposed earlier have been on variety of charges which include extraction ..... he was admitted in the hospital, he left the hospital on the next day without being discharged and without taking permission from the doctor, which lowered the image of the force in the eyes of the hospital employees. the third charge against the petitioner was that he had been imposed five major punishments and 19 minor punishments but still he had .....

Jay Shree Tea Ltd. Vs. Industrial Tribunal(1) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1990(60)FLR608]; (1991)IILLJ154All

..... and one sided order.20. sub-sections (1) and (2) of the old section 25o of the central act minus the proviso to sub-section (1) read:(1) an employer who intends to close down an undertaking of an industrial establishment to which this chapter applies shall serve, for previous approval, at least ninety days before the date on ..... and without his fault thrown on the streets, to face the grim problem of unemployment. it was also observed that the workman naturally expects and looks forward to security of service spread over long period, but retrenchment destroys his expectations. the object of retrenchment compensation is, therefore, to give partial protection to the retrenched employee to ..... or where the permission for closure has been refused. in that event the workman will be entitled to all the benefits under any law for the time being in force as if no notice had been given. compensation as specified in section 25n will be payable to the employees on the grant of the permission to close.13. .....

Afsar Mian Vs. Labour Court and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1991(63)FLR721]; (1994)IIILLJ589All

..... in mohan lal v. management, bharat electronics limited 1981 (42) flr 389. in both these cases, the supreme court while interpreting section 2(oo) read with section 25f of the central industrial disputes act has laid down the principles that if the case is not covered by any of the excepted categories, then the striking off the name of a worker from ..... burn and company v. their employees air 1957 sc.p.38. in this case, the concerned workman, namely ashima nanda banerji was arrested by the government under the west bengal security act and detained in jail from 25.1.49 to 5.4.1951. the company terminated services of the said workman on 22.4.49. the tribunal made an award ..... and order by reason of their questionable activities in connection with a labour dispute, as in this case, the work of the company will be paralysed if the company is forced to give leave to all of them for a more or less indefinite period. such a principle will not be just; nor will it restore harmony between labour and .....

Manvendra Shah, Member of Parliament Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All92; (1995)2UPLBEC1060

..... forced to migrate and that area has been continuously becoming a victim of terrorism since independence till the present day. this problem has created a great challenge for the state of jammu & kashmir as well as for the central government. in national interest, looking into all the aspects of the problem the whole responsibility for security ..... the development programmes providing the basic facilities have stopped. for solution of the problems of unemployment, the legal bar for the establishment of any industry based upon the mineral wealth of the area, the absence of any provision for the maintenance of those developmental projects which have been completed, ..... clear, the second order probably seeks to do it. we may first deal with the second classification. 450. society does not remain static. the industrialization and the urbanization which necessarily followed in its wake, the advance on political, social and economic fronts made particularly after the commencement of the constitution, .....

Chakarpur Sugar Works and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1975All379

..... producer would be paid for part of his stock required to be sold to government ..................... if this be the true meaning of clause (b), it must mean securing a reasonable return to the industry and not to each unit, irrespective of whether it is economic or reasonably efficient or not, or only in respect of its stock required to be compulsorily sold ..... ) of the essential commodities act the price of sugar had to be determined by the central government and unless the price of khandsari sugar had been determined by the central government, the state government could not take effective action. further, as the emergency is still in force the defence of india rules cannot be deemed not to create a particular situation for action .....