Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: central industrial security force act 1968 section 1 short title extent and commencement Court: jharkhand Page 1 of about 12 results (0.108 seconds)

Employer in Relation to the Management of Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2005(1)JCR320(Jhr)]

..... having its registered office at koyla bhawan, koyla nagar, dhanbad. the central government brought an act, to constitute and regulate the armed force of the union for the better protection and security of the industrial undertakings owned by the central government and certain other industrial undertaking and for the matters connected therewith known as the central industrial security force act. (hereinafter referred to as the cisf act.). section 14 of ..... the said act, provides for deputation of the force to industrial undertakings in public sector. under the .....

Hirdeo Prasad (No. 8017761) Ex-constable of C.i.S.F. Unit B.T.P.S. (D. ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR381(Jhr)]

..... orderm.y. eqbal, j. 1. petitioner has challenged the order passed by the inspector general, central industrial security force, eastern sector, patna, whereby he has rejected the revision petition and held that punishment of dismissal from service is the appropriate punishment imposed upon the petitioner.2. the ..... service is commensurate with the seriousness or the gravity of the charges. the charges levelled against the petitioner are prima facie of serious nature. the constable in a police force is not only supposed to be very- very diligent in duty but also supposed to be most disciplined and obeying the command of his immediate boss. recently, in the ..... duty is so serious and grave that it warrants removal from service is an issue which should have been best left to be decided by the appropriate authority of the force itself. the learned single judge, therefore, once again erred in deciding himself that the penalty of dismissal was not commensurate with the seriousness or the gravity of the .....

Parwej Khan Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... .2. the secretary, ministry of home affairs govt. of india, north block, new- delhi.3. the group commandant, central industrial security force (c.i.s.f) head quarter chandigarh- pin no. 160009.4. deputy inspector general, north zone, central industrial security force (c.i.s.f) ministry of home affairs c.i.s.f. campus, north zone, saket, new delhi- 110017 ..... by the petitioner was rejected.2. the facts, as averred in the writ application, in a nutshell, is that the petitioner was enrolled as member of central industrial security force (cisf) on 11.02.2006 and confirmed after two years. while continuing in the post two charges were levelled against the petitioner. charge no.1 ..... said writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to prefer a revision application in terms of sub- section (2a) of section 9 of the central industrial security force act, 1968. as per direction in w.p.(s) no.4453 of 2010, the petitioner submitted his representation before the inspector general (i.g.), c .....

Indra Pal Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... decision taken by the disciplinary authority is not sustainable.18. with respect to the submission the order of punishment which has been mentioned under rule-34 of central industrial security force rules, 2001 wherein under the heading of major penalty 34(v) description of the punishment imposed against the petitioner has been made which is as follows ..... per the rule laid down in the central industrial security force act, 1968 as also the rules. the witnesses have been called for their examination which were ten in numbers.13. after perusal of the inquiry ..... record because in the court of inquiry the name of other personnel have come including the petitioner who were involved in the incident.12. the respondents central industrial security force, on the basis of the finding given by the court of inquiry has framed the charge. the petitioner has been provided an opportunity to defend as .....

U.P. Singh Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary, Ministr ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(1)JCR376(Jhr)]

..... comply with the directions of the superior officers fully and that he exceeded his jurisdiction. relying on section 21 of the central industrial security force act, 1968 (the act for short), he submitted that certain protection of acts of officers and members of the force is given under the act. me further submitted that the acts done by the petitioner were under the orders of ..... team and under whose orders, the company was led by the petitioners, in which he said that charges leveled against the petitioner are not proper, rather the members of the force were entitled to reward. this witness justified the entire action. he also submitted that for the self same occurrence, on the one hand, petitioner has been rewarded and on the .....

Rohitash Choudhary Cisf No.103 Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... pin-303120. .... petitioner versus 1. union of india through the ministry of home affairs, new delhi.2. commandant, central industrial security forces (cisf), 8th res. bn., p.o. & p.s. jaipur, rajasthan.3. inspector general, central industrial security forces (cisf), (ministry of home affairs), cisf office campus, eastern zone headquarter, boring road, patna, p.o. & ..... and the petitioner has further prayed for quashing/setting aside the order dated 29.06.2011 passed by inspector general, central industrial security forces (cisf) (respondent no.3) pertaining to rejection of appeal thereby confirming the order passed by the disciplinary authority and the petitioner ..... accompanied writ application, the petitioner has inter-alia prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 25.04.2011 passed by commandant, central industrial security forces (cisf), (ministry of home affairs), cisf unit-bhakokoli, bccl dhanbad (respondent no.4) pertaining to termination from the services of cisf .....

Constable B N Sharma Alias Bishwanth Sharma Vs. The Union of India and ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... . ...appellant versus 1. the union of india representing central industrial security force department, new delhi; 2. the director general, central industrial security force, c.g.o. complex, lodhi road, new delhi; 3. the inspector general, central industrial security force, eastern sector ii qrs., 19, telegraph colony, kidwaipuri, patna; 4. the deputy inspector general, central industrial security force, heavy engineering corporation limited, dhurwa, ranchi; 5. the assistant commandant, central industrial security force, h.m.b.p. unit, heavy engineering corporation limited .....

Firoj Khan Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... of sri yusuf khan, resident of village & post usian, district ghajipur presently working as constable, central industrial security force, b.c.c.l, dhanbad... petitioner versus 1. the union of india through ministry of home affairs, new delhi 2. director general, central industrial security force (cisf) new delhi.3. inspector general, c.i.s.f., eastern command, patna 4 ..... as revealed and stated in the writ application in a nutshell, is that the petitioner was appointed on 18.03.1993 as constable at shaktinagar in central industrial 2 security force (hereinafter referred to as the c.i.s.f. ) in uttar pradesh. after undergoing training at r.t.c., arrenacullam on 17.01 ..... tantamounts to gross indiscipline, disobedience of lawful order of his superiors, gross negligence and dereliction of his duty being a member of an armed force of union and accordingly statement of imputation of charge or negligence, dereliction of duty, indiscipline and disobedience of lawful orders of his superiors, in .....

Employers in Relation Management of Rajrappa Washery Vs. Presiding of ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... the concerned workmen were employed as per the settlement arrived at between the trade union and the management of the corporation. subsequently upon entrusting the security work to the central industrial security force, their services were dispensed with. the matter went up to the hon ble supreme court of india, and taking into consideration its earlier decision ..... art. 226 of the constitution of india. i find no infirmity and / or illegality in the impugned award dated 18th september, 2000 passed by the central government industrial tribunal no. 1, dhanbad, in reference case no. 02 of 1994 and reference case no. 59 of 1992.18. there is no merit in both ..... . 02 of 1994 as also in reference case no. 59 of 1992 passed by the presiding officer, central government industrial tribunal no.1, dhanbad. 2 4. the industrial disputes referred by the central government for adjudication to the industrial tribunal, in both these cases are that whether the action of the management of rajrappa washery of .....

Ajay Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... of india through the secretary, ministry of home affairs, union of india, new delhi 2. director general, central industrial security force, cgo complex, lodhi road, new delhi.3. inspector general, central industrial security force, eastern zone headquarters, boring road, patna 4. deputy inspector general, central industrial security force, bokaro steel city, bokaro 5. senior commandant/administrator, central industrial security force unit, bokaro steel limited, p.o., p.s. and district- bokaro (jharkhand) .... . respondents --------- coram: hon ble .....